News

**Mojosodope**

Aqua Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
This whole tread is a logical fallacy.

q.v. The No True Scotsman Fallacy.

Aqua understands almost nothing about logic or science. Don't take her word for anything.

Don't forget the Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy. Or the Fallacy of Repeated Assertion.

She has nothing BUT logical fallacies to support her positions. She hopes to entrap those who are as ignorant as she is.

fallacies?

so tell me, you two 'brilliant' minds...

which of the elements on my list, are a 'logical fallacy' and are unnecessary, and could have been removed and absent from the ingredients in the recipe that began and continues to sustain life on earth....

and life as we know it....would continue.

I'll even number them for you....and rephrase for easier reading...

1. Could there be life on earth as we know it, without the element of CARBON?

2. Could there be life on earth as we know it, if there were no moon?

2. Could there be life on earth, as we know it if the sun were much closer or further away from earth?

3. Could there be life on earth, without a specific portion of water to land ratio?

4. Could there be life on earth as we know it without the Nitrogen Cycle?

5. Could there be life on earth, without the curved atmosphere protecting earth, that also splits and diffuses the sun’s spectral light...?

6. Could there be life on earth if any of the elements of carbon dioxide and oxygen, etc., were not present in the atmosphere...?

7. Could there be life on earth as we know it, without the electrical outbursts of lightning?

8. Could there be life on earth AT ALL....if the element of SALT had never been present....?.

Start with a more logical way.

Ask yourself what am I?

Then let me know how it all works.

**Mojosodope**

Aqua Wrote:

to appear.........and evolve.

Science Channel just made claims that our solar system has just the right amount of planets, that are in just the right place to not only protect earth, but they also influence the perfectly spaced dance around the sun....with our earth being in just the right place in distance from the sun, to keep from completely freezing, or burning up.

To understand all the integral and important STEPS that are in just the right place in the orchestrated dance that were REQUIRED to create and promote life on our planet...AS WE KNOW IT.

consider this....

*If there were no carbon,.....there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*If there were no moon.....there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*Without the sun set in it's specific place...........there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*Without a specific portion of water on the earth.......there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*Without the Nitrogen Cycle......there would be no life on earth.

*Without the curved atmosphere protecting earth, that splits the sun’s spectral light.......there would be no life on earth.

*Without the specific blend of elements in the atmosphere.......there would be no life on earth.

*Without lightning......there would be no life on earth, as we know it....

*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN...

*Without the element of SALT.........there would be no life on earth.

So if you were to remove JUST ONE of those above ^^^ that are significant necessary ELEMENTS of LIFE... from the machinations of earth's biosphere.......

there would be no life on earth....as we know it.

If you didnt know you existed right now, would any of those matter?

You dont need those things, they need YOU!

**Ahriman**

Here's my silly theory:

Right now earth is the perfect place for life. Once the core cools not so much. It matters not the distance from the sun but the heat between the sun and the heat of our molten core. Once the two heats reach equilibrium, then molds and such start to grow from the bubbling brew.

Back in the past, Mars core was in equilibrium with the sun ergo it sustained life. Nowadays Mars' core has cooled and the planet is just a shell of what it was. In the future, Venus' core will cool to that sweet spot and life will spring up there. Life is life is life. With a human, animal or a planet. Indeed with stars and galaxies as well. Everything is born, lives and dies. Everything.

Farther back in the past, there was a tug and pull 'war' going on between the Sun and Saturn. Little bits of Sun were 'pulled' out by Saturn's effect. Some of these bits stuck around and started revolving/evolving round the sun. We now call these little bits the cored planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars and while not technically a planet, the Moon. The moon is the oldest of these cored planets and it's 'oven' has long been shut down but it still has a magnetic charge leftover. Sooner or later that charge will wear off.

It's not that the earth needs the moon for life to form, it just makes it hella more interesting what with the magnetic effect. Rofl

Well that's my load of smarmy crap. Cheers

**~shootz~** lop guest User ID: 124769 10-02-2012 06:10 PM

Earth is an island and if you not careful it will be f*cked up like easter island.

There's no doubt that some people will have to be leaving.

Just the way it is

Sorry Heartflowers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlRQjzltaMQ

Tissue

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 124758 10-03-2012 08:25 PM

Aqua Wrote:

Quote: Don't take her word for anything.

same could be said for scientists, where something they claim one year, is completely proven to be WRONG and an utterly embarrassing FAIL.

[...]

That's the built-in safety checks of the discipline of science. All scientific theories are provisional - subject to overthrow in the face of better evidence. I don't expect you to accept that because it blows your argument clear out of the water again, but it's the truth.

In fact, the highest accolades in science go to those who have overturned previous paradigms with models having more and better explanatory and predictive capacity.

You've been told this a dozen times, and have been regulary laughed out of your seat in the peanut gallery. You always try the same threadbare arguments in a new venue, and get away with it until someone better informed than you comes along.

And they always do.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 124758 10-03-2012 08:32 PM

Aqua Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
This whole tread is a logical fallacy.

q.v. The No True Scotsman Fallacy.

Aqua understands almost nothing about logic or science. Don't take her word for anything.

Don't forget the Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy. Or the Fallacy of Repeated Assertion.

She has nothing BUT logical fallacies to support her positions. She hopes to entrap those who are as ignorant as she is.

fallacies?

so tell me, you two 'brilliant' minds...

which of the elements on my list, are a 'logical fallacy' and are unnecessary, and could have been removed and absent from the ingredients in the recipe that began and continues to sustain life on earth....

and life as we know it....would continue.

I'll even number them for you....and rephrase for easier reading...

1. Could there be life on earth as we know it, without the element of CARBON?

2. Could there be life on earth as we know it, if there were no moon?

2. Could there be life on earth, as we know it if the sun were much closer or further away from earth?

3. Could there be life on earth, without a specific portion of water to land ratio?

4. Could there be life on earth as we know it without the Nitrogen Cycle?

5. Could there be life on earth, without the curved atmosphere protecting earth, that also splits and diffuses the sun’s spectral light...?

6. Could there be life on earth if any of the elements of carbon dioxide and oxygen, etc., were not present in the atmosphere...?

7. Could there be life on earth as we know it, without the electrical outbursts of lightning?

8. Could there be life on earth AT ALL....if the element of SALT had never been present....?.

How convenient that you finally dropped that color green codswallop.

Salt is not an element, by the way, and neither is CO2.

BTW, what are your sources for claiming that life on earth depends on a specific land to water ratio?

**Aqua**

LoP Guest Wrote:

How convenient that you finally dropped that color green codswallop.

How convenient that you're avoiding agreeing with anything in my list, when in fact, THEY are FACTUAL.

Quote:Salt is not an element, by the way, and neither is CO2.

damn, you're a pinhead.

"el·e·ment (l-mnt)
n.
1. A fundamental, essential, or irreducible constituent of a composite entity.
2. elements The basic assumptions or principles of a subject.
"

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/element