News
news Massive Worldwide Bee Decline Continues as Pesticide Companies Ramp Up the PR
news Is Your Taste In Music Influenced By The Shape Of Your Skull?
news Obama and His Allies Say the Govt Doesn't Listen to Your Phone Calls — But the FBI Begs to Differ
news Nestle: Water’s Corporate Takeover
news Eyeball Licking Sex Craze Sweeps Japan
news The Supreme Court Decided Your Silence Can Be Used Against You
news Putin: Syrian Rebels Eat Human Flesh
news Accident Rates Rise At Intersections With Speed Cameras
news The "Ocean Moon" --Future Missions to Explore Jupiter's Europa
news Plastic Bags Fool Sea Turtles Into Hunting Them
news Magnetic Pole Shift May Happen Sooner than Expected
news Venezuelans download new app which helps locate TOILET PAPER as stock runs low
news How Do Death Valley’s “Sailing Stones” Move Themselves Across the Desert?
news School Holds Toy Gun Buyback Program
news Meet the Contractors Analyzing Your Private Data
news HILARIOUS: Rand Paul Explains Obamacare
news The Shocking Amount of Wealth and Power Held by 0.001% of the World Population
news 22 Nauseating Quotes From Hypocritical Establishment Politicians About The NSA Spying Scandal
news Recomended: Ship Graveyards from Around the World in Pictures
news Cradle Turns Smartphone Into Handheld Biosensor; ‘Performs as Accurately as a Large $50,000 Spectrophotometer in the Laboratory’

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
katsung47
Registered User
User ID: 80598
10-23-2012 10:38 PM

Posts: 228



Post: #1
With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
Quote:With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate

Much of Latin America was dismayed that they got only a glancing mention in Romney and Obama's final presidential debate.

By Sara Miller Llana | Christian Science Monitor – 10/23/2012
That means no candidate talked about the drug trade, despite historic violence playing out in Mexico, much of it along the 2,000-mile border that the US shares.

http://news.yahoo.com/60-000-dead-mexica...57504.html

DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.
Quote this message in a reply
Disquiet
Valar Dohaeris
User ID: 123125
10-23-2012 10:41 PM

Posts: 1,864



Post: #2
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
The "War on Drugs" is more or less the war for drugs. It's big business, which is why nobody likes to talk about it unless necessary.

Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 124067
10-24-2012 02:56 AM

 



Post: #3
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
"The War for the Monopoly on Drugs"
Quote this message in a reply
CountFapula
wet farts = broken hearts
User ID: 51210
10-24-2012 03:06 AM

Posts: 6,160



Post: #4
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
imagine a world where one corporation can kill and behead the others for creating better software of offering a better deal

no replace software with drugs

and corporation with government entity Popcorn

It's all an act What's your part? Fap1
Quote this message in a reply
EndTheFed
Registered User
User ID: 129211
10-24-2012 06:58 AM

Posts: 481



Post: #5
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
Why should our government debate a Mexican government problem. They want things fixed get rid of their government.

Song all Americans should be behind "I'm a Good Ole' American" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRtlUi3OJ...r_embedded
Quote this message in a reply
MrRash
Torus and The Rabbit Hole
User ID: 126128
10-24-2012 07:35 AM

Posts: 6,248



Post: #6
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
EndTheFed  Wrote:
Why should our government debate a Mexican government problem. They want things fixed get rid of their government.

THIS...

but, me thinks they want us for that as well...
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 120155
10-24-2012 07:40 AM

 



Post: #7
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
katsung47  Wrote:
Quote:With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate

Much of Latin America was dismayed that they got only a glancing mention in Romney and Obama's final presidential debate.

By Sara Miller Llana | Christian Science Monitor – 10/23/2012
That means no candidate talked about the drug trade, despite historic violence playing out in Mexico, much of it along the 2,000-mile border that the US shares.

http://news.yahoo.com/60-000-dead-mexica...57504.html

DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.

And when there aren't any more terrorists to kill, they'll turn their attention to the American terrorists.....er....... people. In fact, it's already happening
Quote this message in a reply
Dire_effects
lop guest
User ID: 129106
10-24-2012 07:42 AM

 



Post: #8
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
katsung47  Wrote:
Quote:With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate

Much of Latin America was dismayed that they got only a glancing mention in Romney and Obama's final presidential debate.

By Sara Miller Llana | Christian Science Monitor – 10/23/2012
That means no candidate talked about the drug trade, despite historic violence playing out in Mexico, much of it along the 2,000-mile border that the US shares.

http://news.yahoo.com/60-000-dead-mexica...57504.html

DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.

Because they're mexican.

Not U.S citizens.


What do we care about them?

Maybe their millions should stop trying to make the U.S more like Meh-he-co and go back and take their country back.

On the bright side.

If they all get wiped out we would have some nice room for expansion.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 99336
10-24-2012 07:52 AM

 



Post: #9
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
I don't have a racist bone in me, but for f*ck's sake "Latin America"... is this Presidential debate for the Presidency of Latin America??? If you move to another country to escape your problems then leave your f*cking problems behind, don't drag your f*cking baggage with you.

Intelligence quotient at an all time low. More news at 11.
Quote this message in a reply
Dreaminglady
Registered User
User ID: 127513
10-24-2012 07:52 AM

Posts: 187



Post: #10
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
Dire_effects  Wrote:
katsung47  Wrote:
Quote:With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate

Much of Latin America was dismayed that they got only a glancing mention in Romney and Obama's final presidential debate.

By Sara Miller Llana | Christian Science Monitor – 10/23/2012
That means no candidate talked about the drug trade, despite historic violence playing out in Mexico, much of it along the 2,000-mile border that the US shares.

http://news.yahoo.com/60-000-dead-mexica...57504.html

DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.

Because they're mexican.

Not U.S citizens.


What do we care about them?

Maybe their millions should stop trying to make the U.S more like Meh-he-co and go back and take their country back.

On the bright side.

If they all get wiped out we would have some nice room for expansion.

One problem, They are not going back if so even more are coming to America.
The house next door to us got paid off completely in cold hard cash to the owner.
Bought by a Hispanic family getting the hell out of Mexico so they can raise their kids in a safe area.
They are very clean and quiet and much easier to live next door to than anyone that has lived there since 1969 so I am certainly not going to complain.
The brother bought the house and he is now a legal citizen and he is doing a super job investing money and renovating it while he waits for the rest of his siblings to obtain their legal citizenship.
He does home remodeling for a living and he took that 30+ yr old crappy house and it looks killer now inside and out.

I'm not against Hispanics if they play by the rules and come here legally and get their citizenship.
My neighborhood is aging and I would rather see it going brown than slum black or trailer park grade white.
Quote this message in a reply
Dire_effects
lop guest
User ID: 129106
10-24-2012 07:54 AM

 



Post: #11
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
Dreaminglady  Wrote:
Dire_effects  Wrote:
katsung47  Wrote:
DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.

Because they're mexican.

Not U.S citizens.


What do we care about them?

Maybe their millions should stop trying to make the U.S more like Meh-he-co and go back and take their country back.

On the bright side.

If they all get wiped out we would have some nice room for expansion.

One problem, They are not going back if so even more are coming to America.
The house next door to us got paid off completely in cold hard cash to the owner.
Bought by a Hispanic family getting the hell out of Mexico so they can raise their kids in a safe area.
They are very clean and quiet and much easier to live next door to than anyone that has lived there since 1969 so I am certainly not going to complain.
The brother bought the house and he is now a legal citizen and he is doing a super job investing money and renovating it while he waits for the rest of his siblings to obtain their legal citizenship.
He does home remodeling for a living and he took that 30+ yr old crappy house and it looks killer now inside and out.

I'm not against Hispanics if they play by the rules and come here legally and get their citizenship.
My neighborhood is aging and I would rather see it going brown than slum black or trailer park grade white.

Illegals should be handled as all invading nations have been handled throughout history.

A nice criminal is still a criminal.
Quote this message in a reply
Nottingham 12
Unopened 5 AKA ©®™
User ID: 128479
10-24-2012 08:04 AM

Posts: 1,867



Post: #12
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
I stopped driving down to my winter place on the Yucatan in 2006 because I felt it was getting too dangerous around the boarder crossing towns.

I really miss my winter home.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4ylzYg4VmM

Natural disasters, major attack on the U.S., martial law, civil war, WWIII, foreign invasion/occupation, and then basic survival.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 129226
10-24-2012 08:31 AM

 



Post: #13
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
katsung47  Wrote:
Quote:With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate

Much of Latin America was dismayed that they got only a glancing mention in Romney and Obama's final presidential debate.

By Sara Miller Llana | Christian Science Monitor – 10/23/2012
That means no candidate talked about the drug trade, despite historic violence playing out in Mexico, much of it along the 2,000-mile border that the US shares.

http://news.yahoo.com/60-000-dead-mexica...57504.html

DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.

top comment by op
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 129226
10-24-2012 08:38 AM

 



Post: #14
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
Dire_effects  Wrote:
Dreaminglady  Wrote:
Dire_effects  Wrote:
Because they're mexican.

Not U.S citizens.


What do we care about them?

Maybe their millions should stop trying to make the U.S more like Meh-he-co and go back and take their country back.

On the bright side.

If they all get wiped out we would have some nice room for expansion.

One problem, They are not going back if so even more are coming to America.
The house next door to us got paid off completely in cold hard cash to the owner.
Bought by a Hispanic family getting the hell out of Mexico so they can raise their kids in a safe area.
They are very clean and quiet and much easier to live next door to than anyone that has lived there since 1969 so I am certainly not going to complain.
The brother bought the house and he is now a legal citizen and he is doing a super job investing money and renovating it while he waits for the rest of his siblings to obtain their legal citizenship.
He does home remodeling for a living and he took that 30+ yr old crappy house and it looks killer now inside and out.

I'm not against Hispanics if they play by the rules and come here legally and get their citizenship.
My neighborhood is aging and I would rather see it going brown than slum black or trailer park grade white.

Illegals should be handled as all invading nations have been handled throughout history.

A nice criminal is still a criminal.
you mean to say those nice civilized white europeans who invaded most of the world and made colored people slaves and killed millions of them,stolen their lands or muslims who also did the same or russians who also did the same...
hypocrites
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 129236
10-24-2012 09:32 AM

 



Post: #15
RE: With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate
katsung47  Wrote:
Quote:With 60,000 dead, Mexicans wonder why drug war doesn't rate in presidential debate

Much of Latin America was dismayed that they got only a glancing mention in Romney and Obama's final presidential debate.

By Sara Miller Llana | Christian Science Monitor – 10/23/2012
That means no candidate talked about the drug trade, despite historic violence playing out in Mexico, much of it along the 2,000-mile border that the US shares.

http://news.yahoo.com/60-000-dead-mexica...57504.html

DEA makes living on drug case. FBI makes living on terror case. Without these cases, they lose value to exist. So if there is none, they create one.

To expand their power, DEA invented "War on drugs"; FBI and Pentagon invented "War on Terror". Under those two wars, drug business and terror activities become prosperous. So are the DEA, FBI and Pentagon. They got fat budget and expanded power - Patriot Act and NDAA.

The race is rigged. Both, the Black and the White horse are owned by the same elite bankster and they will push for AGENDA 21 and World Governance...

Nobody represents me.Heartflowers
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1