News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 74671 03-16-2012 03:22 AM

Ozymandias Wrote:

czygyny Wrote:
Read it in context you twit. This is Job speaking ill of YHWH and he is chastised by it later by Him when He comes to address Job and his friends for their false accusations and assessments of His nature.

In what context do you read the Levitical rules which command women leave civilization during their period of menstruation not to return until they have performed a cleansing ritual which includes the sacrifice of doves?

Or how about the decree that a woman is in a state of filth for twice as long after giving birth to a girl instead of a boy.

**Ray-Ray Debarge** lop guest User ID: 82249 03-16-2012 03:24 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Ozymandias Wrote:
czygyny Wrote:
Read it in context you twit. This is Job speaking ill of YHWH and he is chastised by it later by Him when He comes to address Job and his friends for their false accusations and assessments of His nature.

In what context do you read the Levitical rules which command women leave civilization during their period of menstruation not to return until they have performed a cleansing ritual which includes the sacrifice of doves?

Or how about the decree that a woman is in a state of filth for twice as long after giving birth to a girl instead of a boy.

Yeah, that shit ain't cool.

**The Evil AC** I am not a number!!! User ID: 666 03-16-2012 03:24 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Ozymandias Wrote:
czygyny Wrote:
Read it in context you twit. This is Job speaking ill of YHWH and he is chastised by it later by Him when He comes to address Job and his friends for their false accusations and assessments of His nature.

In what context do you read the Levitical rules which command women leave civilization during their period of menstruation not to return until they have performed a cleansing ritual which includes the sacrifice of doves?

Or how about the decree that a woman is in a state of filth for twice as long after giving birth to a girl instead of a boy.

Context dude! Don't you see this being nessisary with the lineage of Jesus and stuff? I mean you are not a theologan. STFO

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 71142 03-16-2012 03:27 AM

I love, follow and worship YHVH.

He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 80336 03-16-2012 03:28 AM

Job.1
[1] There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

Question....was this a book about the past or was it a PROPHETIC book?

Why is not Job listed in the geneology of Jesus Christ like everyone else in the NT? Read the opening of the New Testament.

"There was a man in the land of Uz..." (US... get it?)

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 74671 03-16-2012 03:30 AM

barbsat Wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDgCnoCMf9k

Splendid!

**51:50**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Job.1
[1] There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

Question....was this a book about the past or was it a PROPHETIC book?

Why is not Job listed in the geneology of Jesus Christ like everyone else in the NT? Read the opening of the New Testament.

"There was a man in the land of Uz..." (US... get it?)

The Book of Job is the oldest book in the Bible. It predates any of the writings of the Torah.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 80336 03-16-2012 03:36 AM

&amp;quot;The
Beast&amp;quot; Wrote:

<< Job 9:23 >> (King James Version) If the scourge slay suddenly, he [Yahweh] will laugh at the trial [suffering] of the innocent.

Laughing at the suffering of the innocent is an asshole thing to do. Period.

So you obviously KNOW that Job is the righteous man of God. Otherwise you would have said that Job just doesn't know the real, loving God. Or that Job doesn't know what he is talking about. But no, you AGREED with what you THOUGHT he said.

You should have read the first passage of the book of Job and you would have realized he is a HUNTER OF EVIL...

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 80336 03-16-2012 03:40 AM

51:50 Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Job.1
[1] There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

Question....was this a book about the past or was it a PROPHETIC book?

Why is not Job listed in the geneology of Jesus Christ like everyone else in the NT? Read the opening of the New Testament.

"There was a man in the land of Uz..." (US... get it?)

The Book of Job is the oldest book in the Bible. It predates any of the writings of the Torah.

That is irrelevant. The question is weather it is PROPHETIC or did he live in the past. Could he be here NOW in other words? Or can you find any evidence of his existance in the PAST? Where is the land of Uz then?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 83890 03-16-2012 03:40 AM

&amp;quot;The
Beast&amp;quot; Wrote:

<< Job 9:23 >> (King James Version) If the scourge slay suddenly, he [Yahweh] will laugh at the trial [suffering] of the innocent.

Laughing at the suffering of the innocent is an asshole thing to do. Period.

Your preaching sucks.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 77819 03-16-2012 03:41 AM

Yaweh = Bipolar Archon

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 80336 03-16-2012 03:43 AM

51:50 Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Job.1
[1] There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

Question....was this a book about the past or was it a PROPHETIC book?

Why is not Job listed in the geneology of Jesus Christ like everyone else in the NT? Read the opening of the New Testament.

"There was a man in the land of Uz..." (US... get it?)

The Book of Job is the oldest book in the Bible. It predates any of the writings of the Torah.

There is no conclusive evidence for that either. Fact is that no one really knows when it was written actually. It is a very mysterious book.

**Pope Barbie Imaculata**

51:50 Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Job.1
[1] There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

Question....was this a book about the past or was it a PROPHETIC book?

Why is not Job listed in the geneology of Jesus Christ like everyone else in the NT? Read the opening of the New Testament.

"There was a man in the land of Uz..." (US... get it?)

The Book of Job is the oldest book in the Bible. It predates any of the writings of the Torah.

Did the little sky pixies tell you that with their enchanted dust?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 65790 03-16-2012 03:47 AM

Cosmah Wrote:

Uh, that Yahweh thing killed all life on earth. ("Great Flood", anyone?) That about says it all. Where's your "context" now? 'Oh, but, but, everything' on Earth was evil'. Yah, right.

Some people will justify murder in just about any way they can.

It's deeper than that.

We are all still primitives no matter how civilized we think
we are. If we are facing a tornado, fleeing an axe-murderer,
or being the victim in a war,,, or fill in the blank drama unfolding
that is about to grab you by the balls, or swallow you up whole,
it's still a God vs. human situation. Whatever envelopes us in
this way is perceived by our unconscious to be "destiny".

The nature of the "Divine" is complex. Most, or all, religions try
to get us to reconcile ourselves to our fate and to face it with
dignity and find meaning in it. It would be a comic book version
of God to say that he is all love, or all harmony and everybody lives
happily ever after. Each life is unique and each person faces unique
challenges. The early descriptions of Jahweh are pretty close to
how people probably felt when suffering under the extreme conditions
of that time. "God is great,,, but he sure does suck some times..."

I don't think that people "invented" this God. It sounds much more
like a psychological and phenomenological observation.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 44595 03-16-2012 03:52 AM

I don’t think the internet is very good for religions.

If children keep learning from the internet, religions might suffer.

The internet must be the work of the devil!

Ehkrsgfi