News
news George Soros Switches From Physical Gold to Gold Stocks and That is Very Bullish for Gold Prices
news Four fireballs fall over U.S. in 24 hour period
news Russians drive over North Pole to Canada
news Concentrated Fukushima radioactive plume staying on narrow path toward U.S.
news How to Use Chinese Condiments
news Google’s Plan To Take Over The World
news 'Dead' man comes back to life at his funeral
news Visualizing The Silver Squeeze
news Geothermal Energy
news N.A Poe, Adam Kokesh and Others Arrested at Smokedown Prohibition Cannabis Protest in Philadelphia
news FEMA Plans Clear-Cutting 85,000 Berkeley and Oakland Trees
news Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
news Woman who survived flesh-eating infection, receives bionic hands
news Billionaires Now Own American Politics
news Air Force Chemtrail Whistleblower Exposes Geoengineering
news Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million user IDs leaked: Kyodo
news Ruins of Lost City May Lurk Deep in Honduras Rain Forest
news Dark, massive asteroid to fly by Earth on May 31
news Greek addicts turn to deadly new drug 'sisa'
news How to Share Difficult Information with Friends

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 14 Votes - 3.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 51510
04-30-2012 10:22 PM

 



Post: #16
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
mile high mud flow predicted in first blast to smother

montana to tennesee, utah to n. new mexico, ohio to missouri


GET TO HIGHER GROUND NOWWWW!!!!

then 9 years of -40F winters

BRING SOME HOT COCOA NOWWWW!!!!

then the super lava monsters will appear

GET VACCINATED NOWWW !!!!!
Quote this message in a reply
Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη
Disgruntled but unarmed
User ID: 39573
05-01-2012 12:08 AM

Posts: 11,848



Post: #17
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
LoP Guest  Wrote:
I've always argued this.....just because it's a massive volcano does not mean it will massively super erupt.... i think it wil be more of an ooze
Or a series of large belches. No matter what kind of an eruption there would
be trouble for the farms of the Great Plains, the US "breadbasket". There
will probably be a lot of ash thrown up.




LoP Guest  Wrote:
yes at some point the species will have to deal with an impact, large eruption, record earthquake, super tsunami, and probably sun doom.

in our lifetime, nah.
I couldn't feel comfortable claiming that, and I'll probably live at least
another 30 to 50 years. I didn't expect to see a tsunami like the Boxing
Day quake but we've seen it. The Japan quake tsunami was expected
but not in such a devastating height. Record sized quakes happen about
once every 50 years and the Japan quake last year ranks as a top 3.

As more the planet's population increases we're going to see higher death
rates than ever before. That's just a factor of having more people than
ever before.

So never say never. chuckle

"Why did you build houses where tornadoes were apt to happen?"
— Pat Robertson, on recent storm deaths, explaining how he thinks
we should have never populated the entire Midwest
S977

DrPostman BsD
[Image: black_cat.gif]
(This post was last modified: 05-01-2012 12:08 AM by Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη.) Quote this message in a reply
CooterBrown
Registered User
User ID: 49022
05-01-2012 12:13 AM

Posts: 9,600



Post: #18
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
DrPostman  Wrote:
I couldn't feel comfortable claiming that, and I'll probably live at least
another 30 to 50 years. I didn't expect to see a tsunami like the Boxing
Day quake but we've seen it. The Japan quake tsunami was expected
but not in such a devastating height. Record sized quakes happen about
once every 50 years and the Japan quake last year ranks as a top 3.

As more the planet's population increases we're going to see higher death
rates than ever before. That's just a factor of having more people than
ever before.

So never say never. chuckle



Yep, and all roads lead to Anthro Climate Change ... so things are
gonna continue to become more and more ... "interesting".


"May you live in interesting times." ~ Ancient Chinese Curse



CooterBrown  Wrote:
-- If there IS a marked increase in EQs, Volcanoes, Tornadoes,
Hurricanes and other natural disasters, it is most likely the
scientifically-predicted result of Climate Change ... which most
Doomers and New Agers reject because they subjectively prefer
some magical religious/spiritual ascension-doom woo-woo instead
(Link)(Link).

The End Ain't Nigh ... You Just Want It To Be
Quote this message in a reply
Nitwit
Registered User
User ID: 92155
05-01-2012 01:40 AM

Posts: 3,104



Post: #19
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
Jnofdrkn

A Nitwit Disclaimer:

Drink3 Headspin1
Quote this message in a reply
Kanaima
Registered User
User ID: 87861
05-01-2012 02:58 AM

Posts: 2,720



Post: #20
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
Is the sum of all the above

its trickle down doom one incident after another for a prolonged time
take Fukusintheshimer that one is killing folks and will continue for a while

meanwhile back at the ranch doomers are throwing an issy fit
because of it
they want Hollywood style doom non stop

shit started happening a while back

ø Jhikpghf
Quote this message in a reply
Betty F. Crocker
Life ain't nothin but dishes and laundry
User ID: 67579
05-01-2012 09:22 PM

Posts: 1,450



Post: #21
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
These were showing on USGS but have apparently been disappeared. Obviously some duplicates, but worth looking into. Take a look while they're still up:

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/

Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:11:18 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.9 10.0
Quote this message in a reply
Peace Out
Don't mind me, Im lost
User ID: 93876
05-01-2012 10:49 PM

Posts: 2,967



Post: #22
.
.
(This post was last modified: 08-07-2012 01:37 AM by Peace Out.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 93970
05-01-2012 11:29 PM

 



Post: #23
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
Betty F. Crocker  Wrote:
These were showing on USGS but have apparently been disappeared. Obviously some duplicates, but worth looking into. Take a look while they're still up:

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/

Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:11:18 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.9 10.0

They have been talking about this on Volcano Cafe. Here is a quote posted on there to the possible cause........

Talla says:
May 1, 2012 at 20:28

"Hi Judith – I think I’ve solved the problem. A search of Google Maps – putting in 44.13N 105.32W, which are the coordinates given by EMSC, puts you slap-bang on top of a huge open-cast mine. As Carl has told us – these mines cause enormous explosions which are usually filtered out by the various monitoring sites – this is why the US site is not showing it. I think EMSC will soon remove it as it is obviously not a ‘real’ seismic event."

http://volcanocafe.wordpress.com/2012/04.../#comments
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 93987
05-02-2012 12:32 AM

 



Post: #24
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
Betty F. Crocker  Wrote:
These were showing on USGS but have apparently been disappeared. Obviously some duplicates, but worth looking into. Take a look while they're still up:

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/

Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:12:10 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.0 0.8 USGS Feed Detail
Tuesday May 1 2012, 17:11:18 UTC 2 hours ago Wyoming 4.9 10.0

Ok, it has been confirmed at a 4.5 mag........

Magnitude: 4.5
Date-Time

Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 17:11:17 UTC
Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:11:17 AM at epicenter

Location: 44.097°N, 105.285°W
Depth: 0 km (~0 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region: WYOMING
Distances:

19 km (12 miles) SE (143°) from Sleepy Hollow, WY
20 km (13 miles) SE (135°) from Antelope Valley-Crestview, WY
27 km (17 miles) SE (139°) from Gillette, WY
394 km (245 miles) N (358°) from Fort Collins, CO
487 km (302 miles) N (357°) from Denver, CO

Location Uncertainty: horizontal +/- 14.2 km (8.8 miles); depth +/- 2.9 km (1.8 miles)

Parameters: NST=185, Nph=186, Dmin=100.2 km, Rmss=0.98 sec, Gp= 11°, M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=8
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/r...009gcq.php

Interesting to note that the location is an uncertainty and they put it at +/- 14.2km..............
Quote this message in a reply
Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη
Disgruntled but unarmed
User ID: 39573
05-02-2012 08:59 AM

Posts: 11,848



Post: #25
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
It's fine to keep track of the quakes at Yellowstone, but keep in mind
that about 4 or 5 years ago on TOP people were regularly freaking out
about the quakes claiming that a big eruption was just about to happen.
Look at how that panned out.

"Why did you build houses where tornadoes were apt to happen?"
— Pat Robertson, on recent storm deaths, explaining how he thinks
we should have never populated the entire Midwest
S977

DrPostman BsD
[Image: black_cat.gif]
Quote this message in a reply
tethys
Registered User
User ID: 59284
06-18-2012 11:22 AM

Posts: 6,371



Post: #26
RE: Yellowstone 'super-eruption' less super, more frequent than thought
Shallow earthquake - look at the map -

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=44.6733+-1...d&t=h&hl=e

MAP 2.7 2012/06/18 03:27:42 44.673 -110.401 1.0 YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/r...es_all.php

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/r...10_eqs.php
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1