News

**Axx** lop guest User ID: 104143 06-24-2012 12:41 AM

smerve Wrote:

Are the dating methods used by Archbishop James Usher superior to Radiometric dating?" [/b]

Science has confirmed his correct reading of the Bible, yes.

And your maps & charts only show more ice in the past proving earth returns to preflood conditions as the ice melts away. The ice was a flood/post flood result as the water jetted out of the mid-oceanic ridge high into the air falling back to earth on the poles as ice flash-freezing the woolly mammoths.

• The Global Flood Explained
with Dr. Walt Brown
http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/HydroPlate...index.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tihMbc4McVA

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 103687 06-24-2012 12:43 AM

68 page thread on this topic is profoundly douchbagic

**Aqua** · (This post was last modified: 06-24-2012 01:05 AM by Aqua.)

Devil's flower mantis...

[Image: A63D_4FE649C1.jpg]

vs. a Carmen Miranda Impersonator...

http://www.communitywebs.org/CedunaOyste...20girl.jpg

random coincidence...?

I think not.

:P

**smerve**

The followers of Archbishop Usher claim that there was no Ice Age.

[Image: 2794_4FE65049.gif]

_______________________

[Image: 273B_4FE65049.jpg]

_______________________

[Image: 26EF_4FE65049.jpg]

_______________________

[Image: 6AE6_4FE65049.jpg]

_______________________

**Gibbie** · **Gibbie** ^D ^D ^D whoa User ID: 49076 06-24-2012 01:35 AM **Posts: 7,187**

**smerve**

Aqua Wrote:

Take into consideration that those insects who wear such unique outer dressing.... are not randomly emerging in an environment where there is no such other plant life that looks like them....no.....they emerge wearing mirrored mimicked camouflage within the very environment that contains the plants, etc., that they're mimicking!

that in and of itself, cannot be defined as a random coincidence.

For instance, these beautiful Orchid Mantis don't randomly emerge in the Sahara desert or somewhere else far from where orchids flourish....they emerge right in the midst of the environment where the orchids grow.

So there's obviously something else entirely going on outside of the realm of 'random non-conformity', and it's happening on the biological level where a certain conscious awareness seems to be influencing the manifestation of camouflage.

"ran·dom
adj.
1. Having no specific pattern, purpose, or objective: random movements.
Idiom:
at random
Without a governing design, method, or purpose; unsystematically: chose a card at random from the deck."

I think we need a seperate thread on the topic of evolution.

This is the 6000 year thread.

**smerve**

The followers of Archbishop Usher claim that the flood was in 2304 BC

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1059430/Stonehenge-built-2300-BC-prehistoric-Lourdes-dig-44-years-reveals.html

**Spread** · **Spread** More Washboard User ID: 102138 06-24-2012 02:09 AM **Posts: 11,723**

LoP Guest Wrote:

68 page thread on this topic is profoundly douchbagic

I hope it goes 100. Popcorn

**smerve**

The followers of Archbishop Usher claim that the flood was in 2304 BC

http://www.answers.com/topic/year-2300-bce#Events

**Gibbie** · **Gibbie** ^D ^D ^D whoa User ID: 49076 06-24-2012 02:36 AM **Posts: 7,187**

Spread Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
68 page thread on this topic is profoundly douchbagic
I hope it goes 100.

Calling all Morons! Longest thread in the history of the internet.. in progress

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη** · (This post was last modified: 06-24-2012 02:38 AM by Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη.)

Axx Wrote:

• The Global Flood Explained
with Dr. Walt Brown
http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/HydroPlate...index.html

Not with Hydroplate Theory, It's not a scientific theory for one thing.
http://www.cosmicsnark.com/2008/08/debun...s-and.html
http://mypage.direct.ca/w/writer/hydro.html
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Hydroplate_theory

Here's something more specific:
Ya that “theory” (lol) was so dumb it was debunk by another creationist (an old world Creationist by the name of Glenn Morton) who wrote in part (thats all it takes though, just part, because Walt’s “theory” was really that retarded)-
Brown has a 10 km thick granite crust with a 1 km thick layer of water. The pressure is enough to raise a tube of water to 17 km (see Brown, pg. 37, Fountains of the Deep). Water squirting up out of the hole will rise to that level. What is the velocity of the water coming out of the crack? Ignoring friction, this can be found by equating the potential energy of the drops at 17 km to the kinetic energy at the surface needed to propel the water that high. Thus:

gh = .5v^2
where:
h is the height of the water, 17 km
v is the velocity
g is the acceleration due to gravity, 9.8

Solving for v, we have v = 577 meters /sec. According to the steam table cited below, there is a 814 times increase of volume in the phase change. The vapor occupies 814 times more volume.

Now, According to Steam Tables (Combustion Engineering Inc., 1940), the pressure needed to keep water a liquid at 250º F, which is the temperature of Brown’s water, is 2.02 atmospheres.

Consider a 1 square meter tube with 577 cubic m/s emanating from it. Due to the fact that 2.02 atmosphere is the weight of 20 meters of water, water coming up the crack will not change to steam until the final 20 meters. With the velocity of 577 meters per second coming out of the crack, this means that 577 cubic meters each second will occupy 814 times the volume that it used to. As a water surface passes the point at which it turns into vapor, it will, within one second, be pushed 577 x 814 = 469,779 m. This is a velocity of 469 kilometers per second. There would be no flood since none of the vapor would remain on the earth. The earth’s escape velocity is about 11 kilometers per second. Any object that exceeds 11 km per second leaves the earth and never returns. How could this theory cause a flood?

In reality these numbers would be somewhat smaller due to frictional effects, but even if they are off by 99%, the steam escaping is still above escape velocity for the earth. The steam would be sent to Alpha Centauri!!”

If you can’t tell right off the bat why this “theory” (doubt subby even knows what a theory is) fails outright in every other area it makes claim to, you need to pick up a physics, chemistry, and geology book.
source: http://soulpants.wordpress.com/2008/03/1...te-theory/

We have corals older than 5,000 years, so that alone disproves
a worldwide flood. Coral reefs cannot survive in deep water.

**Jackie Chiles**

I hope it gets to 6,000 pages.

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη**

This video does an excellent job debunking Noah's flood:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sD_7rxYoZY#!

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη**

More about "The Flood"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IPGwAf0Ivw

**smerve**

Will you accept this as evidence of 6000 years plus ?

[Image: E3AB_4FE67726.jpg]