News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 58637 05-19-2012 03:59 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Outlander Wrote:
Wow.
Do some research.
That was by far the most moronic statement I have ever heard.
Watch the Apollo 0 movie for a start.

Says one who thinks that people are more intelligent now than they were years ago, when they didn't have graphing calculators to rely upon. Hmm, don't you have something to Occupy? Baaa, baaa...science is lies. Baaa, baaa.....

There. Now that makes for a better start to this battle of wits. Go 'head.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 96631 05-19-2012 04:04 PM

It will probably look better than their feeble attempt at fooling us into believing they landed on the moon.

One FACT that no one picks up on about the fakeness of the landings is the distance to the horizon, the moon is large enough to give quite a vista if you were standing on it filming, especially in the spot they supposedly landed, the sea of tranquility.

As quite an accomplished 3d modeller, i attempted to recreate the landing, i managed to get hold of the topology data for the moon from an official gov website, took me ages to convert the data into a useable format for displacement of the moon i created to the exact diameter of the actual moon, finally after all my work i was rewarded with a 50meter/pixel resolution which was useless, go ahead and try yourself, i'm no expert in DEMs afterall, but it is very suspiscious how you can get hold of Mars topology data of a much greater resolution.

Verdict: they don't want us to accurately model the moon, cos people will quickly realise that the landscape on the Apollo videos does not match in the slightest.

**Azrael**

I'm still in two minds about both stories.

Looking at it this way - bullshit or not someone will be making a beeeiatch load of cash moneyzzz!

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 97375 05-19-2012 04:10 PM

The moon mission was obviously cover. But for what?

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη**

Outlander Wrote:

The LYING ACTORS from the Apollo 11 MOVIE gave the Dutch Prime Minister a FAKE MOON ROCK.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8226075.stm

Why are they lying about who gave him that rock? It was one of our US
ambassadors and it was only months after the first Moon landing
so highly improbable that it was real to begin with.
"Drees received it as a private gift on October 9, 1969 from then-US ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their ‘Giant Leap’ goodwill tour after the first moon landing." The museum acknowledged that though they did vet the moon rock they failed to double check it.[65] The museum was under the incorrect belief that this moon rock was one of the 135 Apollo 11 moon rocks that were presented to the nations of the world by the Nixon Administration.[66] "It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," said Frank Beunk, a geologist involved in the investigation.[67]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_...roven_fake

Geologists can tell the difference between a Moon rock and an Earth Rock.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 58637 05-19-2012 04:15 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

The moon mission was obviously cover. But for what?

If Buzzy hadn't walked on something that looked like a moon, then them Ruskies would have never known the US space program was dominant. What power! Some might say the Capitalist machine and its components could not tolerate this for they had big, big plans for that power.

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη** · (This post was last modified: 05-19-2012 04:23 PM by Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη.)

"The museum acquired the rock after the death of former prime minister Willem Dreesman in 1988. Dreesman received it as a private gift on October 9, 1969 from then-US ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their "Giant Leap" goodwill tour after the first moon landing.

Middendorf, who lives in Rhode Island, told Dutch NOS news that he had gotten it from the US State Department, but couldn't recall the exact details.

The museum had vetted the moon rock early on by checking with NASA, Van Gelder said.

She said the space agency told the museum then that it was possible the country had received a rock: NASA gave moon rocks to more than a 100 countries in the early 1970s, but those were from later missions".
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/du...-f1gd.html

[Image: 5A72_4FB7ACBB.jpg]

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 58637 05-19-2012 04:44 PM

Maybe they can take out the Moon with a couple of hijacked airplanes. Might just get rid of any evidence of any fake landings. Nah...maybe I'm just not being realistic here.

~~Outlander~~ · **~~Outlander~~** Banned User ID: 97480 05-20-2012 04:01 AM **Posts: 191**

LoP Guest Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Outlander Wrote:
OH, my bad...
They are "REALLY" going to land on an asteroid.

How hard can it be? Just figure out some vectors and shit...voila, we're on that asteroid, pumping the minerals out of it. Now that's a life cycle, eh? Isn't it? I think it is...

Says one who thinks that people are more intelligent now than they were years ago, when they didn't have graphing calculators to rely upon. Hmm, don't you have something to Occupy? Baaa, baaa...science is lies. Baaa, baaa.....

Newer generations DO have a higher IQ.
http://www.indiana.edu/~intell/flynneffect.shtml

~~Outlander~~ · **~~Outlander~~** Banned User ID: 97480 05-20-2012 04:03 AM **Posts: 191**

DrPostman Wrote:

Outlander Wrote:
The LYING ACTORS from the Apollo 11 MOVIE gave the Dutch Prime Minister a FAKE MOON ROCK.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8226075.stm
Why are they lying about who gave him that rock? It was one of our US
ambassadors and it was only months after the first Moon landing
so highly improbable that it was real to begin with.
"Drees received it as a private gift on October 9, 1969 from then-US ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their ‘Giant Leap’ goodwill tour after the first moon landing." The museum acknowledged that though they did vet the moon rock they failed to double check it.[65] The museum was under the incorrect belief that this moon rock was one of the 135 Apollo 11 moon rocks that were presented to the nations of the world by the Nixon Administration.[66] "It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," said Frank Beunk, a geologist involved in the investigation.[67]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_...roven_fake

Geologists can tell the difference between a Moon rock and an Earth Rock.

A+ Effort, shill.

NASA faked the landing, and gave fake rocks to the world leaders.

~~Outlander~~ · **~~Outlander~~** Banned User ID: 97480 05-20-2012 04:05 AM **Posts: 191**

LoP Guest Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
The moon mission was obviously cover. But for what?

If Buzzy hadn't walked on something that looked like a moon, then them Ruskies would have never known the US space program was dominant. What power! Some might say the Capitalist machine and its components could not tolerate this for they had big, big plans for that power.

Yep, now that the US is a bunch of fat old unproductive losers, they need a new fake landing to rah rah rah about.
ASTEROIDS!
MARS!
A DUR HUR A DUR HUR HUR.

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη**

Outlander Wrote:

A+ Effort, shill.

NASA faked the landing, and gave fake rocks to the world leaders.

So the many thousands of geologists all over the world who have
examined them are ALL participating in a perfect coverup?

Really?

[Image: B296_4FB858F2.jpg]

**pauldamo**

typical bait thread. S977

~~Outlander~~ · (This post was last modified: 05-20-2012 12:35 PM by Outlander.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...o9geIwWTGQ

~~Outlander~~ · **~~Outlander~~** Banned User ID: 97534 05-20-2012 12:37 PM **Posts: 191**

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo9geIwWTGQ