|
Thread Rating:
- 11 Votes - 4.27 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
|
JF Priest Subscriber User ID: 47416 02-20-2012 04:33 PM
Posts: 23,878
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
LoP Guest Wrote:Ron Paul's view on Sexual Harrassment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDk1_JApggk
What if was your mother, daughter or wife?
How many women will vote for Ron Paul once they see this video?
If you do and have a job then you are setting yourself for Ron Paul's Freemason "Good Ole Boys" to sexually harass you. If you don't like it the just quit.
are you saying RP is A Mason ??
Ron Paul 2012...The R3volution Continues:
|
|
|
|
JF Priest Subscriber User ID: 47416 02-20-2012 04:35 PM
Posts: 23,878
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
OmarEastwind Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:OmarEastwind Wrote:No way! The Judge??? That would be awesome...is it true though?
link to image: http://i657.photobucket.com/albums/uu299...f24c17.jpg
That's what RP said in the video.
It sounded like he was joking around...not really an official announcement yet. 
This is all over the Net.. It has been posted here before... It sounds like an edit at the end.. But it is worthy of continued discussion...
Ron Paul 2012...The R3volution Continues:
|
|
|
|
JF Priest Subscriber User ID: 47416 02-20-2012 04:36 PM
Posts: 23,878
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
51:50 Wrote:I'm probably going to vote for Santorum.
AOK.. Why Rick ??
Ron Paul 2012...The R3volution Continues:
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 76806 02-20-2012 04:37 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
DanfromtheHills Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:DanfromtheHills Wrote:We need federal laws governing speech in the workplace?
You might want to view it again. He never said that.
Right he didn't. Nor would he, as that is a violation of free speech. Freedom of speech also allows people to say things you don't agree with, and/or don't like. It's also your right to not work for, buy from, or associate with such individuals. Let them reap what they sow.
I was specifically asking what course the AC would recommend, it seems like a federal law is what was being asked for. Sorry, I'll be more clear for you next time.
Women, Men who are close to retirement age, People with Disabilities Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political funding from racial minorities. Sure you can find a black Ron Paul supporter but will they open their wallet for him? No. Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political treasure chest from women. Why do you even need to ask why this is the case. No Paul says he would have voted against the Civil Rights Laws now in place. And yes it is because some states will discriminate against women and minorities given the chance. They already do but the check and balance of a federal government to prohibit States from doing so at least limits the abuse of power of States wanting to discriminate. Ron Paul's White Supremacists have failed to even get a significant voting block from even mostly White 85% Republicans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118937/republ...gious.aspx
Why are you White Supremacist Ron Paul Supporters even talking about a running mate when you can't even get White voters to vote for Ron Paul? The answer of course is that you are Civil War Revisionist, racist bigots like Ron Paul and he is only hope for an America that allows sexist bigots to have slaves. Ron Paul is against a minimum wage so if he were to win, how many of Eon Paul's White Supremacist loyalist will be working for a 1.24 and hour because that is the global free-market wage for Guatemala, in a Libertarian Free Market World?
|
|
|
|
DanfromtheHills Registered Moran User ID: 50292 02-20-2012 04:37 PM
Posts: 25,729
|
|
|
|
DanfromtheHills Registered Moran User ID: 50292 02-20-2012 04:40 PM
Posts: 25,729
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
LoP Guest Wrote:DanfromtheHills Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:You might want to view it again. He never said that.
Right he didn't. Nor would he, as that is a violation of free speech. Freedom of speech also allows people to say things you don't agree with, and/or don't like. It's also your right to not work for, buy from, or associate with such individuals. Let them reap what they sow.
I was specifically asking what course the AC would recommend, it seems like a federal law is what was being asked for. Sorry, I'll be more clear for you next time.
Women, Men who are close to retirement age, People with Disabilities Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political funding from racial minorities. Sure you can find a black Ron Paul supporter but will they open their wallet for him? No. Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political treasure chest from women. Why do you even need to ask why this is the case. No Paul says he would have voted against the Civil Rights Laws now in place. And yes it is because some states will discriminate against women and minorities given the chance. They already do but the check and balance of a federal government to prohibit States from doing so at least limits the abuse of power of States wanting to discriminate. Ron Paul's White Supremacists have failed to even get a significant voting block from even mostly White 85% Republicans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118937/republ...gious.aspx
Why are you White Supremacist Ron Paul Supporters even talking about a running mate when you can't even get White voters to vote for Ron Paul? The answer of course is that you are Civil War Revisionist, racist bigots like Ron Paul and he is only hope for an America that allows sexist bigots to have slaves. Ron Paul is against a minimum wage so if he were to win, how many of Eon Paul's White Supremacist loyalist will be working for a 1.24 and hour because that is the global free-market wage for Guatemala, in a Libertarian Free Market World?
Wow, that hurt my eyes to read.
Did you have a point with that?
EDIT, Actually nevermind. The above post has nothing to do with the topic of the thread, or what your talking about concerning the video you posted. It also assumes I said things which I didn't, and calls me a racist.
You are beneath conversing with.
The Sun and Sandy Hook
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 76806 02-20-2012 04:41 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 78965 02-20-2012 04:43 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
|
|
|
|
JF Priest Subscriber User ID: 47416 02-20-2012 04:46 PM
Posts: 23,878
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
LoP Guest Wrote:DanfromtheHills Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:You might want to view it again. He never said that.
Right he didn't. Nor would he, as that is a violation of free speech. Freedom of speech also allows people to say things you don't agree with, and/or don't like. It's also your right to not work for, buy from, or associate with such individuals. Let them reap what they sow.
I was specifically asking what course the AC would recommend, it seems like a federal law is what was being asked for. Sorry, I'll be more clear for you next time.
Women, Men who are close to retirement age, People with Disabilities Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political funding from racial minorities. Sure you can find a black Ron Paul supporter but will they open their wallet for him? No. Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political treasure chest from women. Why do you even need to ask why this is the case. No Paul says he would have voted against the Civil Rights Laws now in place. And yes it is because some states will discriminate against women and minorities given the chance. They already do but the check and balance of a federal government to prohibit States from doing so at least limits the abuse of power of States wanting to discriminate. Ron Paul's White Supremacists have failed to even get a significant voting block from even mostly White 85% Republicans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118937/republ...gious.aspx
Why are you White Supremacist Ron Paul Supporters even talking about a running mate when you can't even get White voters to vote for Ron Paul? The answer of course is that you are Civil War Revisionist, racist bigots like Ron Paul and he is only hope for an America that allows sexist bigots to have slaves. Ron Paul is against a minimum wage so if he were to win, how many of Eon Paul's White Supremacist loyalist will be working for a 1.24 and hour because that is the global free-market wage for Guatemala, in a Libertarian Free Market World?
Let this man educate you on RP and Why he voted the way he did for the Civil Rights Act...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCob0zKxu...ure=colike
Ron Paul 2012...The R3volution Continues:
|
|
|
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2012 04:54 PM by JF Priest.)
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 76806 02-20-2012 04:47 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
DanfromtheHills Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:DanfromtheHills Wrote:Right he didn't. Nor would he, as that is a violation of free speech. Freedom of speech also allows people to say things you don't agree with, and/or don't like. It's also your right to not work for, buy from, or associate with such individuals. Let them reap what they sow.
I was specifically asking what course the AC would recommend, it seems like a federal law is what was being asked for. Sorry, I'll be more clear for you next time.
Women, Men who are close to retirement age, People with Disabilities Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political funding from racial minorities. Sure you can find a black Ron Paul supporter but will they open their wallet for him? No. Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political treasure chest from women. Why do you even need to ask why this is the case. No Paul says he would have voted against the Civil Rights Laws now in place. And yes it is because some states will discriminate against women and minorities given the chance. They already do but the check and balance of a federal government to prohibit States from doing so at least limits the abuse of power of States wanting to discriminate. Ron Paul's White Supremacists have failed to even get a significant voting block from even mostly White 85% Republicans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118937/republ...gious.aspx
Why are you White Supremacist Ron Paul Supporters even talking about a running mate when you can't even get White voters to vote for Ron Paul? The answer of course is that you are Civil War Revisionist, racist bigots like Ron Paul and he is only hope for an America that allows sexist bigots to have slaves. Ron Paul is against a minimum wage so if he were to win, how many of Eon Paul's White Supremacist loyalist will be working for a 1.24 and hour because that is the global free-market wage for Guatemala, in a Libertarian Free Market World?
Wow, that hurt my eyes to read.
Did you have a point with that?
Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul. Ron Paul can not even win an almost excessively White Republican Nomination. Ron Paul will certainly never win a general election that includes Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
It is clear now that the Ron Paul drones who scoured the internet to shove Ron Paul down their throats and skewed straw polls are not going to win the Republican Nomination. If he ran as a White Supremacist in a National 3rd Party run, he might get 13% of the vote. There are always 10% of the population that are sociopaths and another 3% that have had too much of Ron Paul's koolaid to know he is a racist, sexist White Supremacist.
|
|
|
|
JF Priest Subscriber User ID: 47416 02-20-2012 04:55 PM
Posts: 23,878
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
LoP Guest Wrote:DanfromtheHills Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:Women, Men who are close to retirement age, People with Disabilities Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political funding from racial minorities. Sure you can find a black Ron Paul supporter but will they open their wallet for him? No. Ron Paul gets less than 1% of his political treasure chest from women. Why do you even need to ask why this is the case. No Paul says he would have voted against the Civil Rights Laws now in place. And yes it is because some states will discriminate against women and minorities given the chance. They already do but the check and balance of a federal government to prohibit States from doing so at least limits the abuse of power of States wanting to discriminate. Ron Paul's White Supremacists have failed to even get a significant voting block from even mostly White 85% Republicans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118937/republ...gious.aspx
Why are you White Supremacist Ron Paul Supporters even talking about a running mate when you can't even get White voters to vote for Ron Paul? The answer of course is that you are Civil War Revisionist, racist bigots like Ron Paul and he is only hope for an America that allows sexist bigots to have slaves. Ron Paul is against a minimum wage so if he were to win, how many of Eon Paul's White Supremacist loyalist will be working for a 1.24 and hour because that is the global free-market wage for Guatemala, in a Libertarian Free Market World?
Wow, that hurt my eyes to read.
Did you have a point with that?
Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul. Ron Paul can not even win an almost excessively White Republican Nomination. Ron Paul will certainly never win a general election that includes Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
It is clear now that the Ron Paul drones who scoured the internet to shove Ron Paul down their throats and skewed straw polls are not going to win the Republican Nomination. If he ran as a White Supremacist in a National 3rd Party run, he might get 13% of the vote. There are always 10% of the population that are sociopaths and another 3% that have had too much of Ron Paul's koolaid to know he is a racist, sexist White Supremacist.
Who Do You Support ???
Ron Paul 2012...The R3volution Continues:
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 76806 02-20-2012 04:57 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
JF Priest Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:DanfromtheHills Wrote:Wow, that hurt my eyes to read.
Did you have a point with that?
Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul. Ron Paul can not even win an almost excessively White Republican Nomination. Ron Paul will certainly never win a general election that includes Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
It is clear now that the Ron Paul drones who scoured the internet to shove Ron Paul down their throats and skewed straw polls are not going to win the Republican Nomination. If he ran as a White Supremacist in a National 3rd Party run, he might get 13% of the vote. There are always 10% of the population that are sociopaths and another 3% that have had too much of Ron Paul's koolaid to know he is a racist, sexist White Supremacist.
Who Do You Support ???
Cynthia McKinney is my pick.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 78965 02-20-2012 04:58 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
LoP Guest Wrote:JF Priest Wrote:Who Do You Support ???
Cynthia McKinney is my pick.
Who? 
|
|
|
|
JF Priest Subscriber User ID: 47416 02-20-2012 05:00 PM
Posts: 23,878
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
LoP Guest Wrote:JF Priest Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul. Ron Paul can not even win an almost excessively White Republican Nomination. Ron Paul will certainly never win a general election that includes Women, Men who are retired or close to retirement age, People with Disabilities, and Racial Minorities are the voting blocks that will vote against Ron Paul.
It is clear now that the Ron Paul drones who scoured the internet to shove Ron Paul down their throats and skewed straw polls are not going to win the Republican Nomination. If he ran as a White Supremacist in a National 3rd Party run, he might get 13% of the vote. There are always 10% of the population that are sociopaths and another 3% that have had too much of Ron Paul's koolaid to know he is a racist, sexist White Supremacist.
Who Do You Support ???
Cynthia McKinney is my pick.
You like who you like.. Go and vote for her... But She is not even on the Ballot.. You will have to write her in...
Ron Paul 2012...The R3volution Continues:
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 62010 02-20-2012 05:21 PM
|
RE: ron paul announces running mate 19 feb
Paul supporters are the same as Obama supporters 4 years ago. if elected, it would be the same disappointment. Except Paul doesn't have a chance of being elected
And why do you Paul supporters think he's any different? Because politicians never lie? Oh, that's right they ALL lie EXCEPT Ron Paul, right?
|
|
|
|
|