Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G

The Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety filed a lawsuit to stop 5G in U.S. District Court in New Mexico on December 21, 2018. We are asking the court to declare that city, state, and federal laws which deprive citizens of the right to protect themselves from harm, and deprive injured persons of any remedy for their injuries, are unconstitutional and void.

These laws violate the First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances. These laws violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments because they deprive people of life, liberty and property without due process of law, and because they are a taking of property without just compensation. Our First Amended Complaint can be seen here: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...laint.pdf.

We need more of these.

And a new suit challenging FCC directly on their bogus "if it doesn't COOK you, it must be safe" "safety" standard.

---

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity

They are not going to let silly little things like mental and physical health stop them from rolling this out

it's already done in a lot of places.

What most people do not understand is this has a scale to it...they can "crank it up" so to speak and it has a lot more damaging effects

I always tell people that they used 5G bandwidth to drive wild boars away at the Korean winter Olympics and people seem to get foggy eyed and don't listen...they did...they admitted it and touted it as a strength of the system and signal

This CAN be used as a crowd dispersal tool...these units are going to be on every street corner very soon

If you get a crowd demanding something...I don't know...like food and clean water...

They can crank the power up on that area and make you very uncomfortable...hang around and they crank it up higher to where you are forced to flee the area.

They proved this with the wild boars

but no one is paying attention or they don't want to believe what they are hearing

"but muh facefuck pagez will load faster"

The Case Number is 1:18-cv-01209. Anyone interested can use LAW360 or any other search engine to keep up to speed on this suit.

Damnrod  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:28 PM)

They are not going to let silly little things like mental and physical health stop them from rolling this out

it's already done in a lot of places.

What most people do not understand is this has a scale to it...they can "crank it up" so to speak and it has a lot more damaging effects

I always tell people that they used 5G bandwidth to drive wild boars away at the Korean winter Olympics and people seem to get foggy eyed and don't listen...they did...they admitted it and touted it as a strength of the system and signal

This CAN be used as a crowd dispersal tool...these units are going to be on every street corner very soon

If you get a crowd demanding something...I don't know...like food and clean water...

They can crank the power up on that area and make you very uncomfortable...hang around and they crank it up higher to where you are forced to flee the area.

They proved this with the wild boars

but no one is paying attention or they don't want to believe what they are hearing

"but muh facefuck pagez will load faster"

Perfect depopulation weapon.

You don't have to turn it all the way up, just enough to make people sick over a few years.

Then they go to the doctor, get pills for the symptoms, and the pills make them sicker and then they get pills for that....

And they PAY for the 5G service and the toxic pills.

Self-funding depopulation.

Old Whatshisname  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:34 PM)

The Case Number is 1:18-cv-01209. Anyone interested can use LAW360 or any other search engine to keep up to speed on this suit.

I expect a creepy crawl on the pace of this thing.



But maybe not.

Firtstenberg has done his homework, so I'd be surprised if it gets summary dismissed.

He sent me a newsletter today via email:

Quote:News

Alarming Decline in Millennials’ Health

Millennials -- the first generation to grow up using cell phones -- are experiencing an unprecedented decline in their health when they reach their late 20s.

On April 24, 2019, the American health insurance association Blue Cross Blue Shield released a report titled “The Health of Millennials.” It showed not only that the health of this generation takes a sharp decline beginning at age 27, but also that the prevalence of many medical conditions rose precipitously among millennials in just three years.

The prevalence of eight of the top ten conditions among all millennials showed a double-digit increase in 2017 as compared with 2014. Major depression increased 31%. Hyperactivity increased 29%. Type II diabetes increased 22%. Hypertension increased 16%. Psychoses increased 15%. High cholesterol increased 12%. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis increased 10%. Substance use disorder increased 10%.

The decline in millennials’ health from 2014 to 2017 was not due to their being three years older. The report also compared the health of millennials who were 34-36 years old in 2017 to the health of Gen Xers who were 34-36 years old in 2014. At the same age, 34- to 36-year-olds in 2017 had 37% more hyperactivity, 19% more diabetes, 18% more major depression, 15% more Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, 12% more substance use disorder, 10% more hypertension, and 7% more high cholesterol than 34- to 36-year-olds had in 2014.

When the researchers looked at all health conditions, they found that 34- to 36-year-olds in 2017 had a 21% increase in cardiovascular conditions, a 15% increase in endocrine conditions, and an 8% increase in other physical conditions compared to 34- to 36-year-olds in 2014.

The Blue Cross Blue Shield report is here: https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-ameri...illennials

The only reasonable explanation for the alarming decline in health of the millennial generation is the life-long irradiation of their brains and bodies from their cell phones....

(from my inbox)

It's not just millineals. Gen x-ers are in poor shape as well. All but one of my friends has EHS symptoms.

Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:38 PM)

Old Whatshisname  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:34 PM)

The Case Number is 1:18-cv-01209. Anyone interested can use LAW360 or any other search engine to keep up to speed on this suit.

I expect a creepy crawl on the pace of this thing.



But maybe not.

Firtstenberg has done his homework, so I'd be surprised if it gets summary dismissed.

He sent me a newsletter today via email:

Quote:News

Alarming Decline in Millennials’ Health

Millennials -- the first generation to grow up using cell phones -- are experiencing an unprecedented decline in their health when they reach their late 20s.

On April 24, 2019, the American health insurance association Blue Cross Blue Shield released a report titled “The Health of Millennials.” It showed not only that the health of this generation takes a sharp decline beginning at age 27, but also that the prevalence of many medical conditions rose precipitously among millennials in just three years.

The prevalence of eight of the top ten conditions among all millennials showed a double-digit increase in 2017 as compared with 2014. Major depression increased 31%. Hyperactivity increased 29%. Type II diabetes increased 22%. Hypertension increased 16%. Psychoses increased 15%. High cholesterol increased 12%. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis increased 10%. Substance use disorder increased 10%.

The decline in millennials’ health from 2014 to 2017 was not due to their being three years older. The report also compared the health of millennials who were 34-36 years old in 2017 to the health of Gen Xers who were 34-36 years old in 2014. At the same age, 34- to 36-year-olds in 2017 had 37% more hyperactivity, 19% more diabetes, 18% more major depression, 15% more Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, 12% more substance use disorder, 10% more hypertension, and 7% more high cholesterol than 34- to 36-year-olds had in 2014.

When the researchers looked at all health conditions, they found that 34- to 36-year-olds in 2017 had a 21% increase in cardiovascular conditions, a 15% increase in endocrine conditions, and an 8% increase in other physical conditions compared to 34- to 36-year-olds in 2014.

The Blue Cross Blue Shield report is here: https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-ameri...illennials

The only reasonable explanation for the alarming decline in health of the millennial generation is the life-long irradiation of their brains and bodies from their cell phones....

(from my inbox)

It's not just millineals. Gen x-ers are in poor shape as well. All but one of my friends has EHS symptoms.

What is EHS?

I am relatively sure that this is not going to be good for anyone

I just wonder why the "elites" think they can avoid the side effects

what do they know that we sheep are not privileged to?

do they have special clothes and hats?

How can anyone with a brain not realize this is not going to be good for anyone?

It's being installed near where I live. They have cut down dozens and dozens of trees that have been there for who knows how long. Super old trees on peoples property even I couldn't figure out why they were cutting them down at first but eventually a lady at a store I live near told me.
Every house in the area has piles of cut up logs in their yards I wonder if they got paid by AT&T or if the city found a way to do it so they could just roll up in someones yard and start cutting down their trees.

engineering  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:59 PM)

It's being installed near where I live. They have cut down dozens and dozens of trees that have been there for who knows how long. Super old trees on peoples property even I couldn't figure out why they were cutting them down at first but eventually a lady at a store I live near told me.
Every house in the area has piles of cut up logs in their yards I wonder if they got paid by AT&T or if the city found a way to do it so they could just roll up in someones yard and start cutting down their trees.

I'm going to plant bamboo.



Then paint it with metal paint.

engineering  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:59 PM)

It's being installed near where I live. They have cut down dozens and dozens of trees that have been there for who knows how long. Super old trees on peoples property even I couldn't figure out why they were cutting them down at first but eventually a lady at a store I live near told me.
Every house in the area has piles of cut up logs in their yards I wonder if they got paid by AT&T or if the city found a way to do it so they could just roll up in someones yard and start cutting down their trees.

Probably some stretch of "eminent domain" clause

They can do whatever they want if they deem it "for the better of society"....

Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-12-2019 08:00 PM)

engineering  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:59 PM)

It's being installed near where I live. They have cut down dozens and dozens of trees that have been there for who knows how long. Super old trees on peoples property even I couldn't figure out why they were cutting them down at first but eventually a lady at a store I live near told me.
Every house in the area has piles of cut up logs in their yards I wonder if they got paid by AT&T or if the city found a way to do it so they could just roll up in someones yard and start cutting down their trees.

I'm going to plant bamboo.



Then paint it with metal paint.

My house is a block house....cinderblock. 1500 SF, one level ranch style. My garage is separate and I have a carport that separates the house from garage

Hell I have a hard time getting cell signal in several rooms in the house as it is now

I have thought about doing the stucco thing.

That puts a metal "cage" around your house as cladding for the stucco to stick to....

it's pricey and my wife doesn't like the idea...she wants to go with a brick and wood veneer....I keep telling her that I have my reasons for wanting stucco

stucco in all practical terms...builds a faraday cage if the metal cladding it binds to is grounded

Damnrod  Wrote: (06-12-2019 08:01 PM)

engineering  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:59 PM)

It's being installed near where I live. They have cut down dozens and dozens of trees that have been there for who knows how long. Super old trees on peoples property even I couldn't figure out why they were cutting them down at first but eventually a lady at a store I live near told me.
Every house in the area has piles of cut up logs in their yards I wonder if they got paid by AT&T or if the city found a way to do it so they could just roll up in someones yard and start cutting down their trees.

Probably some stretch of "eminent domain" clause

They can do whatever they want if they deem it "for the better of society"....

What are you going to tell the 7 year olds with a pad that they can't have 5g. Lol.

Or tv.

Better Call Saul.

Damnrod  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:58 PM)

What is EHS?

I am relatively sure that this is not going to be good for anyone

I just wonder why the "elites" think they can avoid the side effects

what do they know that we sheep are not privileged to?

do they have special clothes and hats?

How can anyone with a brain not realize this is not going to be good for anyone?

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.

Background:
We are currently witnessing the largest change to the Earth's electromagnetic environment that has ever taken place in human history. This change has taken place in the very short period of a handful of decades and continues to escalate at an exponential rate (Appendix 1). Given that household electricity, which was the first anthropogenic (man-made) electromagnetic field (EMF), only became prolific after the turn of the century, artificial EMF has barely seen one generation from cradle to grave.

The use of higher frequency microwave devices such as mobile telephony, Wi-fi and smart meters, have suddenly become commonplace despite almost no safety testing and decades of evidence of potentially lethal effects. This has sparked a political and scientific debate that is gathering momentum on a daily basis, raising concern about the continued use of such devices. One may assume when witnessing the vast implementation of, for example
Wi-fi in the home, school, workplace or public domain, that experts have provided sufficient evidence of safety to overwhelm scientific concern. This is not the case.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Classified RF as a Group 2 B 'Possible Human Carcinogen" (2011). Despite this, there has been no attempt in the UK at disseminating this important information to the public. Conversely, it was not even mentioned in the AGNIR government commissioned report a year later in 2012. The only safety guidelines currently used in the UK are those constructed in 1998 regarding 'thermal (heating) effects' of non-ionising radiation. These are not protective of health given the vastly documented non-thermal effect taking place orders of magnitude below these levels. They are obsolete.

Other countries have responded to this information and have safety
limits more biologically sensible, thousands of times lower than here in the UK (see Appendix 2). Mechanistic data is available to explain these effects and every bodily system is affected (as one would expect from a radiation induced illness).

The very broad range of RF emitting devices on the market were never pre-market safety tested and many now contain fine print warnings from the manufacturers which warn that one must keep the devices a minimum distance from the body which in some cases is incompatible with use.

The public are generally not aware of these warnings or the increased vulnerability of certain groups such as children, foetuses, elderly,
pregnant women, infirm and those with EHS. The full paper gives an overview of facts that should be considered during the policy change that is clearly
necessary, and this subsection concerns Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) only.

http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/wp...ussels.pdf

Summary of the science from 2014 before 5G entered the picture....

^^^^

EHS continued:

1. Definition:
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is characterised by an awareness and/or adverse symptomatology in response to even extremely weak (orders of magnitude below current safety levels1,2) electromagnetic fields of multiple types (in terms of frequency/intensity and waveforms). Relevant diagnostic coding that may be used by UK medical doctors include “idiopathic/environmental intolerance (IEI)”, 3,4
code Z58.4 (Exposure to radiation) under the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10),5T66 (microwave syndrome)=”other unspecified effects of external causes: radiation sickness.”6
[Note: All life is electrosensitive to some degree and thresholds for conscious perception will vary depending on age, gender and individual physiology.7,8,9,10 ]


2. Common symptoms include:
Headaches, dizziness, sleep disturbance, sensory up-regulation, palpitations, unusual pain in multiple sites, visual disturbance, auditory disturbance (esp tinnitus), membrane sensitivity, muscle twitching, dermatological complaints, hyperactivity /fatigue (depends on adrenal status/ state of EHS), restless leg
syndrome, memory/concentration disturbance and anxiety11,12,13,14,15 (psychiatric symptoms such as anxiety and depression are likely to be secondary to the physiological effects rather than a primary cause16). Interestingly, with good avoidance, symptoms tend to disappear in the reverse order that they accumulated.


3. Characterised by multiple sensory up-regulation: Up-regulation of all senses is commonly noted in persons with EHS, i.e. Photophobia and/or Scotopic
sensitivity syndrome (visual sensitivity), Hyperacusis (hearing sensitivity), Hyperosmia (heightened sense of smell), Hypergeusia (heightened taste sensitivity), Hyperesthesia/Photosensitivity (heightened skin sensitivity) and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is associated.17,18,99,109

4. Exposure induced:
EHS is a cumulative, exposure-triggered condition, and exposures are rising rapidly (see Appendix 1). Devices which emit RF and known to cause symptoms in those with EHS include: mobile phones, DECT cordless landlines, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth enabled laptop, desktop computers and laptops, Wi-Fi routers, Smart meters, fluorescent lighting, baby monitors, security systems, RFID systems and wireless gaming consoles. ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) fields ((household electrical) will also cause symptoms in some individuals.

5. Characterised by increasing trigger susceptibility and irreversibility:
If EHS is unmanaged and there is general deterioration, there will be reaction to an increasingly broad range of frequencies at increasingly low intensities, i.e. the number of devices complained of triggering symptoms will increase and symptomatic distances will decrease.
19
Tendency towawards MCS will also
increase and irreversibility will become more likely.
20


6. Highly prevalent:
Estimates for the number of people with EHS vary widely, but several countries report around 4-10%.21,22,23 In the UK this corresponds to approximately 2.5 to 6.3 million24 (which is more than the number of UK wheelchair users). This is likely to be a gross underestimation (see point 7 below) given that figures are based on the number of people who have made the connection between their symptoms and EMF exposure. The number of people who have mild EHS symptoms, but have not linked them yet to exposure would be far higher. Given the ubiquity of exposure now in all environments, it can be very difficult for people to notice the association.

7. Rapidly rising:
Extrapolated figures suggest that 50% of the population may be affected by 2017 (Appendix 3).

8. May affect everyone:
Interestingly, the signs and symptoms associated with RF exposures from e.g. mobile phone base
stations,25,26,27,28 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 (also see Appendix 4) Wi-Fi,41,42 mobile phones,
43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,140,143 radio/TV broadcasting transmitters,
70,71,72,73,74 smart meters, 75 MRI scanners,
76
,
77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86 and other RF sources87,88
reveal that the general population (not known to be EHS) experience the same constellation ofsymptoms as are noted in EHS. This is a dose-response relationship. Thus, it is possible that EHS could manifest in all members of the population with enough exposure. (Please note some of the above studies are demonstrating EHS symptoms in children.)

9. Proven physiological condition:
EHS has been demonstrated in a published, peer-reviewed, double blind research study, 89 as an
‘environmentally inducible bona-fide neurological syndrome’, 90 and other provocation testscorroborate this evidence.
73,76,91,92,93,94,95,101
In addition, multiple papers have demonstrated physiological variations in those with EHS25,26,28,31,33,37,92,94,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113
and genetic variations. 99
Furthermore, mechanisms are evolving that may explain the symptomatology
of EHS.
42,44,52,55,56,62,65,69,78,81,87,88,96,100, 114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126 Therefore, increasingly, professional bodies are recognising this as a physiological condition.
127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135

10. Recognised by World Health Organisation (WHO):
The WHO states that 'symptoms are certainly real' and 'in some cases can be disabling'. 136‘Some studies suggest that certain physiological responses of IEI individuals tend to be outside the normal range. In particular, the findings of hyper reactivity in the central nervous system and misbalance
in the autonomic nervous system need to be followed up in clinical investigations and the results for the
individuals taken as input for possible treatment.’ 113

11. Nocebo effect invalid: .....

http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/wp...ussels.pdf

Sorry about the formatting, doesn't transfer well on this browser.

Got any of the symptoms?