News
news The Mystery of the Belmez Faces
news NASA to test ‘space lasers’ with latest launch
news Satellite Images Of Strange Lost City in the South Pacific
news Do Aliens Come From Under the Oceans?
news Bizarre Paranormal Mysteries of World War I
news Human brains and bodies could be hacked to create life in hostile environments
news Nuke fallout alert as Russian radioactive leak sweeps across Europe
news Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
news Government Files and the Abominable Snowman
news Mind-Controlled Drone Swarms Could Soon Put More Eyes in the Sky
news How America’s National Parks Became Hotbeds of Paranormal Activity



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 24 Vote(s) - 2.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
Escalated
Homiletical Praepūtium
User ID: 250859
01-16-2015 01:55 PM

Posts: 12,349



Post: #16
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
Advertisement
I'll try to read some of this later. :-)
(This post was last modified: 01-16-2015 02:14 PM by Escalated.)

FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-16-2015 02:08 PM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #17
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
What isn't a robot!? robot (n.) Look up robot at Dictionary.com
1923, from English translation of 1920 play "R.U.R." ("Rossum's Universal Robots"), by Karel Capek (1890-1938), from Czech robotnik "slave," from robota "forced labor, compulsory service, drudgery," from robotiti "to work, drudge," from an Old Czech source akin to Old Church Slavonic rabota "servitude," from rabu "slave," from Old Slavic *orbu-, from PIE *orbh- "pass from one status to another" (see orphan). The Slavic word thus is a cousin to German Arbeit "work" (Old High German arabeit). According to Rawson the word was popularized by Karel Capek's play, "but was coined by his brother Josef (the two often collaborated), who used it initially in a short story."
All I see are androids:
android (n.) Look up android at Dictionary.com
"automaton resembling a human being," 1842, from Modern Latin androides (itself attested as a Latin word in English from 1727), from Greek andro- "human" (see andro-) + -eides "form, shape" (see -oid). Greek androdes meant "like a man, manly;" compare also Greek andrias "image of a man, statue." Listed as "rare" in OED 1st edition (1879), popularized from c.1951 by science fiction writers.
-oid Look up -oid at Dictionary.com
word-forming element meaning "like, like that of, thing like a ______," from Latinized form of Greek -oeides, from eidos "form," related to idein "to see," eidenai "to know;" literally "to see," from PIE *weid-es-, from root *weid- "to see, to know" (see vision). The -o- is connective or a stem vowel from the previous element.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_T81uUeZcM

Auspicious Master, you have taught me so much! All praise belongs to you! Thank you for granting me this boon and booty!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si-p6gRN3p0
Siva (n.) Look up Siva at Dictionary.com
also Shiva, one of the three supreme gods of Hinduism, lord of destruction and reproduction, 1788, from Hindi Shiva, from Sanskrit Sivah, literally "propitious, gracious,"
auspicious (adj.) Look up auspicious at Dictionary.com
1590s, "of good omen" (implied in auspiciously), from Latin auspicium "divination by observing the flight of birds," from auspex (genitive auspicis) + -ous. Related: Auspiciously; auspiciousness.
This is what we are doing here. Divination.
"from past participle stem of divinare, literally "to be inspired by a god" (see divine (adj.))."

Here is what is happening right now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ihx1BO7_Jvc

When the Base (Qaeda) kicks in, no one is too cool (or frozen) to dance!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAuY9TWichM

Because I like to get on top of the matter and get to the bottom of things!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PCkvCPvDXk

We are all performing our functions! We are our function!
function (n.) Look up function at Dictionary.com
1530s, "one's proper work or purpose; power of acting in a specific proper way," from Middle French fonction (16c.) and directly from Latin functionem (nominative functio) "a performance, an execution," noun of action from funct-, past participle stem of fungi "perform, execute, discharge," from PIE root *bheug- (2) "to use, enjoy" (see brook (v.)). Meaning "official ceremony" is from 1630s, originally in church use. Use in mathematics probably was begun by Leibnitz (1692). In reference to computer operations, 1947.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss_BmTGv43M
perform (v.) Look up perform at Dictionary.com
c.1300, "carry into effect, fulfill, discharge," via Anglo-French performer, altered (by influence of Old French forme "form") from Old French parfornir "to do, carry out, finish, accomplish," from par- "completely" (see per-) + fornir "to provide" (see furnish).
Theatrical/musical sense is from c.1600. The verb was used with wider senses in Middle English than now, including "to make, construct; produce, bring about;" also "come true" (of dreams), and to performen muche time was "to live long." Related: Performed; performing.

Tell them stories in an accent where they know where you are from, soldier!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2HWuCPxmic

We are all stuck on believing!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yCg5Fvnvw4

We want you to like us!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSmz_BnoiK0

There is Nothing here. Here in this thread! The fabric of life. fate (n.) Look up fate at Dictionary.com
late 14c., "one's lot or destiny; predetermined course of life;" also "one's guiding spirit," from Old French fatefata (source also of Spanish hado, Portuguese fado, Italian fato), neuter plural of fatum "prophetic declaration of what must be, oracle, prediction," thus the Latin word's usual sense, "that which is ordained, destiny, fate," literally "thing spoken (by the gods)," from neuter past participle of fari "to speak," from PIE *bha- (2) "speak" (see fame (n.)).
From early 15c. as "power that rules destinies, agency which predetermines events; supernatural predetermination;" also "destiny personified." Meaning "that which must be" is from 1660s; sense of "final event" is from 1768. The Latin sense evolution is from "sentence of the Gods" (Greek theosphaton) to "lot, portion" (Greek moira, personified as a goddess in Homer). The sense "one of the three goddesses (Clotho, Lachesis, and Atropos) who determined the course of a human life" is in English by 1580s. Often in a bad sense in Latin: "bad luck, ill fortune; mishap, ruin; a pest or plague." The native word in English was wyrd (see weird).
weird (adj.) Look up weird at Dictionary.com
c.1400, "having power to control fate, from wierd (n.), from Old English wyrd "fate, chance, fortune; destiny; the Fates," literally "that which comes," from Proto-Germanic *wurthiz (cognates: Old Saxon wurd, Old High German wurt "fate," Old Norse urðr "fate, one of the three Norns"), from PIE *wert- "to turn, to wind," (cognates: German werden, Old English weorðan "to become"), from root *wer- (3) "to turn, bend" (see versus). For sense development from "turning" to "becoming," compare phrase turn into "become."
The sense "uncanny, supernatural" developed from Middle English use of weird sisters for the three fates or Norns (in Germanic mythology), the goddesses who controlled human destiny. They were portrayed as odd or frightening in appearance, as in "Macbeth" (and especially in 18th and 19th century productions of it), which led to the adjectival meaning "odd-looking, uncanny" (1815); "odd, strange, disturbingly different" (1820). Related: Weirdly; weirdness.
"He is the only one who can command them (the Zeus Moiragetes)" Weird!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPmELalsXOg

science (n.) Look up science at Dictionary.com
mid-14c., "what is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;" also "assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty," from Old French science "knowledge, learning, application; corpus of human knowledge" (12c.), from Latin scientia "knowledge, a knowing; expertness," from sciens (genitive scientis) "intelligent, skilled," present participle of scire "to know," probably originally "to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide," from PIE root *skei- "to cut, to split" (cognates: Greek skhizein "to split, rend, cleave," Gothic skaidan, Old English sceadan "to divide, separate;" see shed (v.)).
From late 14c. in English as "book-learning," also "a particular branch of knowledge or of learning;" also "skillfulness, cleverness; craftiness." From c.1400 as "experiential knowledge;" also "a skill, handicraft; a trade." From late 14c. as "collective human knowledge" (especially "that gained by systematic observation, experiment, and reasoning). Modern (restricted) sense of "body of regular or methodical observations or propositions concerning a particular subject or speculation" is attested from 1725; in 17c.-18c. this concept commonly was called philosophy. Sense of "non-arts studies" is attested from 1670s.
In science you must not talk before you know. In art you must not talk before you do. In literature you must not talk before you think. [John Ruskin, "The Eagle's Nest," 1872]

Science, another name of the Master, the Divider, the Distinguisher:

demon (n.) Look up demon at Dictionary.com
c.1200, from Latin daemon "spirit," from Greek daimon "deity, divine power; lesser god; guiding spirit, tutelary deity" (sometimes including souls of the dead); "one's genius, lot, or fortune;" from PIE *dai-mon- "divider, provider" (of fortunes or destinies), from root *da- "to divide" (see tide (n.)).
Used (with daimonion) in Christian Greek translations and Vulgate for "god of the heathen"

I really can't, and "never am I really", except you might see me doing it (taking you by the hand)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mF5_Z4ctXpk

We are the Kings of Oblivion, and Oblivion is the King over all us! Complete Album by God!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISU6YYBWHGM

You are always home, there is no other place, than nowhere! Not vain words, but words about the vain (vain meaning Void, but the Void should not mean "empty space" because that is still "information", God is not empty space, blackness, or whiteness, nor dimensions, nor depth, nor distance, not any information at all! You live in No)! Haha I just stopped typing there to look at something else and came back and saw that!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FH-q0I1fJY
no Look up no at Dictionary.com
"negative reply," early 13c., from Old English na (adv.) "no, never, not at all," from ne "not, no" + a "ever." First element from Proto-Germanic *ne (cognates: Old Norse, Old Frisian, Old High German ne, Gothic ni "not"), from PIE root *ne "no, not" (see un-). Second element from PIE *aiw- "vital force, life, long life, eternity" (see aye (adv.)).
As an adjective meaning "not any" (c.1200) it is reduced from Old English nan (see none), the final -n omitted first before consonants and then altogether.
(This post was last modified: 01-31-2015 05:30 AM by FreedomStands.)
Escalated
Homiletical Praepūtium
User ID: 250859
01-16-2015 02:13 PM

Posts: 12,349



Post: #18
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
FreedomStands  Wrote: (01-16-2015 02:08 PM)
Sheeple People Eater  Wrote: (01-16-2015 01:55 PM)
By the looks of it you are possessed and speaking in tongues?

Haha, did it really make no sense to you? Also, I did not give you any stars, not even one star!

Nah, I was too tired to read all of your post tonight. chuckle Sorry for over-reacting, by the timing I was pretty sure you had an agenda.

I guess I should expect some enemies by now. Cheers
FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-16-2015 02:22 PM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #19
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
Embrace your plasticity!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRqRkRTFlng
plastic (adj.) Look up plastic at Dictionary.com
1630s, "capable of shaping or molding," from Latin plasticus, from Greek plastikos "able to be molded, pertaining to molding, fit for molding," also in reference to the arts, from plastos "molded, formed," verbal adjective from plassein "to mold" (see plasma). Surgical sense of "remedying a deficiency of structure" is first recorded 1839 (in plastic surgery). Meaning "made of plastic" is from 1909. Picked up in counterculture slang with meaning "false, superficial" (1963). Plastic explosive (n.) attested from 1894.
plastic (n.) Look up plastic at Dictionary.com
1905, "solid substance that can be molded," originally of dental molds, from plastic (adj.). Main current meaning, "synthetic product made from oil derivatives," first recorded 1909, coined by Leo Baekeland (see bakelite).

Everything is a sign, you are a symbol!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twRyTso0N2U

Oh Mankind! Your Lord Speaks to you! Will you listen?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXvzzTICvJs

Haha, ironically I haven't really been moving my lips this whole time I've been talking to you all! Neither has God!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDc_5zpBj7s

Shapeless soul:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RHFFeQ2tu4
soul (n.1) Look up soul at Dictionary.com
"A substantial entity believed to be that in each person which lives, feels, thinks and wills" [Century Dictionary], Old English sawol "spiritual and emotional part of a person, animate existence; life, living being," from Proto-Germanic *saiwalo (cognates: Old Saxon seola, Old Norse sala, Old Frisian sele, Middle Dutch siele, Dutch ziel, Old High German seula, German Seele, Gothic saiwala), of uncertain origin.
soul (n.2)
"instinctive quality felt by black persons as an attribute," 1946, jazz slang, from soul (n.1). Also from this sense are soul brother (1957), soul sister (1967), soul food (1957), etc. Soul music, essentially gospel music with "girl," etc., in place of "Jesus," first attested 1961; William James used the term in 1900, in a spiritual/romantic sense, but in reference to inner music.
shape (v.)
Old English scapan, past participle of scieppan "to create, form, destine" (past tense scop), from Proto-Germanic *skapjanan "create, ordain" (cognates: Old Norse skapa, Danish skabe, Old Saxon scapan, Old Frisian skeppa, Middle Dutch schappen "do, treat," Old High German scaffan, German schaffen "shape, create, produce"), from PIE root *(s)kep- a base forming words meaning "to cut, scrape, hack" (see scabies), which acquired broad technical senses and in Germanic a specific sense of "to create."
Middle English shepster (late 14c.) "dressmaker, female cutter-out," is literally "shape-ster," from Old English scieppan.
Meaning "to form in the mind" is from late 14c. Phrase Shape up (v.) is literally "to give form to by stiff or solid material;" attested from 1865 as "progress;" from 1938 as "reform;" shape up or ship out is attested from 1956, originally U.S. military slang, with the sense being "do right or get shipped up to active duty."
shape (n.) Look up shape at Dictionary.com
Old English sceap, gesceap "form; created being, creature; creation; condition; sex, genitalia," from root of shape (v.)). Meaning "contours of the body" is attested from late 14c. Meaning "condition, state" is first recorded 1865, American English. Shape-shifter attested from 1820. Out of shape "not in proper shape" is from 1690s. Shapesmith "one who undertakes to improve the form of the body" was used in 1715.

Forget everything, and you'll remember God:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtH68PJIQLE
oblivion (n.) Look up oblivion at Dictionary.com
late 14c., "state or fact of forgetting," from Old French oblivion (13c.) and directly from Latin oblivionem (nominative oblivio) "forgetfulness; a being forgotten," from oblivisci (past participle oblitus) "forget," originally "even out, smooth over, efface," from ob "over" (see ob-) + root of levis "smooth," from PIE *lei-w-, from root *(s)lei- "slime, slimy, sticky" (see slime (n.)). Meaning "state of being forgotten" is early 15c.
obliterate (v.) Look up obliterate at Dictionary.com
c.1600, from Latin obliteratus, past participle of obliterare "cause to disappear, blot out, erase, efface," figuratively "cause to be forgotten," from ob "against" (see ob-) + littera (also litera) "letter, script" (see letter (n.)); abstracted from phrase literas scribere "write across letters, strike out letters." Related: Obliterated; obliterating.
remember (v.) Look up remember at Dictionary.com
early 14c., "keep in mind, retain in the memory," from Old French remembrer "remember, recall, bring to mind" (11c.), from Latin rememorari "recall to mind, remember," from re- "again" (see re-) + memorari "be mindful of," from memor "mindful" (see memory). Meaning "recall to mind" is late 14c.; sense of "to mention" is from 1550s. Also in Middle English "to remind" (someone). An Anglo-Saxon verb for it was gemunan.

One of my favorites! Posted below as well, as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1AaKBbNGkk

and now this post will be a table of contents and a re-vamping! and I hope you can suck some blood (as in insight, or what is in sight, literally in your sight, as it only can be), out of this thread!





Some epithets:
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9725210
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb13ynu3Iac

EXPLAINING GOD THROUGH REASON
UPDATED! ONLY LOGICAL NECESSITY

http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9676287
THE EASY RELIGION
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=59014
(This post was last modified: 01-31-2015 05:32 AM by FreedomStands.)
FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-17-2015 11:06 AM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #20
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
This time the word used instead of (__) is "God" but it is defined in a certain way so don't let it distract you or cause you to think an old man in a tunic in the sky is being referred to here or any form at all:

"
Who are we?
Why were we created?
Why are we here on Earth?
What is our destination?
What really happens after death?
How can we make spiritual progress?
What is consciousness?
What is God?
"

I will answer all these questions, as they can all be answered. I am not "inventing" or "making up a system" and it isn't that "we don't know", because I will only be speaking about what is "real" by definition based on clear logic, so it can be "known" and isn't just my "opinion" and there aren't "other various truths" because what I am suggesting is not a system at all really, like how people offer up "theories" about "how it works" or any of that which are all conjecture, I am only speaking about what is actually literally observable and known to everyone and obvious, nothing more than that. So people jump the gun on me way too much without trying to understand what I'm saying or how I'm not claiming there is some system I know, but this is all we can know basically. So please pay attention to see I am not actually making anything up but only giving clear definitions for things based on how they are, I am not making any claims about things which can't be known. I am only clearly saying how things actually are.

"Who are we?"

We are "experiencers".

What we "experience" is what I call "information".

That is not a matter of doubt of conjecture, we "know" we are "experiencing information".

I do not know if you are or are not, but I know for certain that I am experiencing information.

Information is "that which informs/is made known in some way/form)".

Absolute anything and everything that can be experienced in some way or form is called "information" in this definition I am giving it.

What can not be experienced in any form is called "non-information".

All you have access to is "now", and all you have access to "now" is "information".

If you perceive anything in any way, that is "information", from your thoughts, to your desires, to your emotions, to concepts, time perception or any perception, to objects, to whatever at all "exists in your experience", what you are "experiencing" is always "information" and "non-information" can not be experienced by definition, by definition it is "that which can not be experienced" in this linguistic framework I am building and describing here.

You are whatever information you are "experiencing" or "perceiving" right "now", and that is all you can ever "experience" any moment.

This is because the information you experience "as you", in the specific way and "moment" that you do, is what "informs you of what you are" that moment, and all you are is one that "experiences information" or "perceives information" or "receives input". If "anything else" were to experience exactly and only the information you are experiencing exactly in the way you are and no more and no less information than you are experiencing right now, it would be "you" "as you are now", and not "anything else" at all.

Another note that may be useful is that you only have access to information, so even what you consider "objects" are particular to your "experience of the object" rather than "the object itself", thus the "object" you "experience" are the only aspects of it you have access to and that "object" you are "experiencing" in a sense, only exists in that particular form for certain in your experience. That is to say, all information you experience as you experience it exactly, is unique to "you" as the "experiencer of that certain information".

There is no such thing as "you" for certain outside of or besides what I have described, which is all one can be certain of. Meaning "you" are just your "experience" and your "experience" is "all you are" at any moment and "all you can know" or "all you are informed of".

Synonyms for "Information" can be "Experience" "Perception" "Knowledge" in my usage. So you can also be called "Perceiver" and "Knower" or "Informed". Anything that is "informed" of anything, that is, anything that receives information in any form, thus "exists" in the moment that it is receiving information. When it is not receiving information, it does not "exist" in the moment that it is not receiving any information (or "any new information" also). All moments of "non-information" or "static-information" are skipped.

So even if "you" are "seeing only black" or "seeing only white" you can not process a "sustained moment" but can only perceive "change". That is, some aspect of your experience would have to be changing in order for you to comprehend anything, so what would be changing at least are your "thoughts" which is still the perception of changing information. Static-information is very similar to non-information, and without a sense of "animation" meaning a sense of "change/motion" there is no "existence/life/perception".

So the experience must be "animated" in order for it to be "experienced" and anything that is "experiencing" thus can be said to "exist" the moment it is experiencing information which gives a sense of being "animated" or "moving", some sort of "moving animation" or a sense of "new information" must be coming to the "receiver" because all "non-information" or "static-information" is entirely skipped, so even if such moments occurred, there is no information in them that can be experienced and for those periods there is only "Nothing" for that person, no existence. Nothing is a synonym for "non-information".

So all you have access to is your experience, and all you ever "know" for certain or "are" is what information you perceive in a moment and are accessing.

"What is God?"

It becomes necessary to place this question before the "Why were we created?" question, due to explaining the origin. The question "Why were we created?" assumes in it the creator, so "What is God?" might be more appropriate to answer second before moving on to the idea of being "created".

We know for certain that all we ever experience is "information" because of how the term has been defined to mean "everything, all things experienced, be they concepts, or whatever else, is categorized as information, as long as it has some form and can be experienced in some way, and whatever ways it is experienced are each experiences or information as well".

God can be defined as "that which ultimately makes all this occur" or if one prefers "whatever at all actually is ultimately responsible for all this or is its causation". The reason I phrase it like that, is so that people do not think some accusation is being made towards any particular "being", but rather a definition is being made first, and then we will see what can only fit that definition and what those qualities would be.

All we know is what we are experiencing, and what we are experiencing is information. So we know for certain, "information" exists, it is the "something" that we can be sure of existing, even if we don't define it much more clearly than that or distinguish its parts, or make any "system" out of it.

Information appears "animated" or "moving".

So another definition for the term "God" can be "whatever at all is ultimately responsible for all information and its appearance of "animation".

Please keep in mind, that the "information" does not "exist or exist for us" or "can not be processed in any way" unless it "appears animated" or "moving", non-information and static-information have no "life" or "existence" or "being" as in they are not "be-ing" as in "exist-ing".

The "movement" of animation can also be thought of as "creation" and "destruction", since "former information no longer exists when new information replaces it, thus the former is destroyed as the newer is created (and takes the place in our experience or "attention")" in appearance, and this gives a sense of "transformation" or "change".

So "whatever at all which is ultimately responsible for that" is what I am making the definition for the term "God". Now keep in mind also that I am saying "ultimately" in my definition, I am not talking about any "sciences" or "forces" in between, but only referring to the Ultimate cause of any information that "exists" thus is "animated information" or "information which is exist-ing or be-ing".

Something which is "destroyed" or "ceases to Be" can not "do" anything, so "information" can not be "responsible" for "information" or "animated information", because when something ceases to "be" it has no existence at all in order for it to continue to act or take any action. So something that ceases to "be" and thus is "destroyed" and "no longer existing" can not not "do" anything or "make" anything happen, because it does not exist in any sense in order to make it happen.

So what we are calling "God" is not information, but "before" information always as its "cause". That is to say "that which is destroyed can not create anew, and information is constantly destroyed and created as in animated and changing, and the destroyed information can not create the new information, so that which is ultimately responsible for the creation of new information or the appearance of animation is what is being referred to here as "God".".

Information is destroyed and created and destroyed and created again in order to "exist" or "be", and whatever is "behind" it doing that, can not be "information" itself, since as soon as information is destroyed and ceases to exist there would be no way for any new information to come into existence (and information could not be destroyed or changed in the first place if there were not a force acting on it to do so or it somehow destroyed itself, and its ability to destroy itself if it were able to destroy itself would be dependent on some "system" and a "system" is information as well and can not exist on its own for the same reasons, thus all points towards an Ultimate power that is not information itself so not effected by these things).

What is being referred to as "God" can not be "information", but is being defined here as "whatever at all is ultimately responsible for the creation and destruction and creation again of information".

Because God can not be information directly or essentially, as explained above, God is in the appearance of "non-information" or "Nothing" and can not be perceived in any way directly, since only information can be perceived, and all information is created by God. Yet God is not "absolute nothing", if "absolute nothing" is going to be defined as "that which has no qualities or abilities and does not exist", because God needs to "exist" in some sense in order for "information" to be "created and destroyed and created again". Now if God "existed" but was in the appearance of "non-information" and so "like nothing" then there would either be "only absolute nothing" and thus no "information" or "God existing and appearing as nothing" and still no information anywhere (essentially, that is to say almost the same thing), so God does not only "exist" but God has the intrinsic "power" or "is the power" that can manifest or generate information and destroy it and create anew, if it were not for God having and being that power, there would be nothing at all anywhere and no information. That is to say, "information" is the "evidence" and the "proof", and this can be deduced logically as I have displayed here clearly. It is not a "system" it is only what is "necessary" based on "what already exists for us in our experience".

Thus, information by its very nature must be "powered" by what I am calling her as "God" ultimately, but the word can be exchanged for "The Power" or whatever else a person might prefer, because God must "Exist" and "Be the Power" and "the Power is the ability to create and destroy and create again" which is the only possible way for there to be "life" or "existence" or "be-ing" of "information".

Now to "do" anything, there must be a "drive" and if there is no "drive" or "will", nothing will happen, and nothing will be done and there will only be nothing. So this "power" to "create and destroy and create again" is "driven" and it is "driven" by the "Will" of God, which "is God" or "God is Will" among the epithets, or if you want some comedy "God is the Will Smith" the "Who forms the Will" and the "Will is whatever then is created by the creative power of God" and all these are basically the same and part of God's intrinsic nature which is ever-existing. God's "will" is not like what we know as our "will" which is "conditioned by information we are dealing with in the moment", but God is "unconditioned" because in order to "manifest information when there was no information since information can not exist before God or exist at all without God, God would require the "will" to do so, or the "thought" if you prefer that term, to do so, but this "thought" or "desire" to do so, can not be based on any "conditions" when there were "no conditions" so it must be "intrinsic" that God is able to will things "FREELY", "FREE WILL" a will not confined by anything above it or below it metaphorically, or around it, but entirely unbounded and un-caused and baseless, without conditions driving it actions." If God did not have the ability to "Will" "Freely" and wasn't the "Will Smith" then there would be no "drive" or "power" to bring anything into existence. A "system" which would be "made of information" can not do it or generate information or even exist or be in place without what is being defined here specifically to explain all this as the only way.

So God has the intrinsic ability to "Will" and the "Will of God" is the ability or "Power" to create information and destroy information and create information anew, which is what gives information its "life" or "animation" or "existence" or "be-ing".

So God and God's qualities are known logically if anyone takes the time to actually think and see what is absolutely necessary, nothing more than what is necessary, nothing less than what is necessary, but only what is absolutely necessary for what exists in our experience this moment to exist.

Information can not exist or "continue" as in "be animated/transform/be created and destroyed and created anew" without God doing it, and this can be called "Sustaining" but the word "Sustaining" and "Foundation" can be misleading, and make people think that it is operating on its own somehow when it can not, as I've explained, information can not exist or exist again and it isn't just being "upheld" but is actually being "created" constantly by the "Will of God" or "Power of God creating and destroyed based on the Will or Drive of God to do so Freely".

EXPLAINING GOD THROUGH REASON
UPDATED! ONLY LOGICAL NECESSITY

http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9676287
THE EASY RELIGION
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=59014
(This post was last modified: 01-17-2015 11:07 AM by FreedomStands.)
FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-17-2015 11:08 AM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #21
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
God could not make use of the "Will" if God could not "Decide". You will see all the "attributes of God" are those which are often absolutely necessary.

God "encompasses all information" but this gives people another wrong idea, that they are in some kind of "orb" or have a "place" "somewhere". God is not made of information, so is like nothing, and so God is not "encompassed by a location" nor "has boundaries" nor is "infinite in space" since "infinite space" and "boundaries" are both forms of information, but God is like nothing at all and is creating and destroying and creating information "within itself" only in a sense of our limited language ability, because there is "no place" but "God", there is no "space" or "location" all of it is just information and information has no "place" or "location" except "within God" who is "like nothing" so is not "empty space" either. In other words, "space" and "dimensions" and whatever else are just information we are receiving, they are "illusory" in a sense, yet "real" in that they are "real information which exists and is perceived by us" but there is no "location" for any of this besides "God" who is not "space" but the information is just being created by God "within God" but God should not be imagined as an "orb" or a "container" or a "box" or even "infinite space" since all those things are information and God is not at all information.

God is actively creating and destroying, which can be called "sustaining" but should not be thought of as "upholding what has an existence of its own that continues to operate fluidly without being destroyed and created anew in order to appear "animated".

The information which is created by God exists nowhere "else" but God, and there is no "place" in any sense, there is only "God" who is the "place" of everything, but God is not like a "park" or a "planet" but is "like nothing, nothing but God" and we can not by any means logically as I have laid forth here "wander" or "exist" or "continue" without "God doing it (because I explained how information ceases to exist in order to continue and only God is what is being referred to as that which is what is doing all of that)" that is "where", for lack of a better term, all this is being done by God, so in a sense "within God alone", there is no other "place" or any "space" but God, but God is not "space" which is just information created by God.

Again, these are not things I am just making up out of nowhere, they are logically necessary, they are not inventions of my own, and they are also additionally confirmed by the scriptures from around the world as well, but even if they never said these things (and they almost all do), they can be logically deduced as I am showing you, and there is no "other way", the logic is "air tight" so to speak, and none of this is a "proposed system of how it works" but these things "must be logically in place always" and these are only "Eternal Truths", and "Eternal Truths" are all "what must be" while "truth" in its little form can be any information that exists or exists "as truth" but logical necessities if they are carefully observed are only those which "must exist" in order to explain whatever, and the real and only "Eternal Truth" is literally God alone because unlike the "truth" or "falsehood" which are both just "information" the "Eternal Truth" is what "must exist" in order to "create the experience" of either "truth or falsehood" at any "moment".

Therefor, "truth" with a little t in this case, can be defined as "any information which exists" and "falsehood" can be defined as "any information which has no current existence or "reality".".

God is not "separate" but "encompasses all information within Himself" (and God is not a Him or a Her which are just "information" related to genitals in this moment of our reality), but is "separate" in the sense of not being dependent on information, but information being dependent on God in order to exist or be "animated" as explained above. God is "encompassing the information" and thus can be said to "know it", the "information" "is what it is". That means "what you are experiencing in particular IS the information you are experiencing in particular, it is not SOMETHING ELSE, you have no access to SOMETHING ELSE, the information IS exactly what you are receiving, you don't have access to anything but exactly the information you are receiving. This may be hard to understand, so I will continue to explain.

You have no access to the chair for example other than the "information of the chair" and that "information of the chair" is all that "exists in your experience" that is to say "the information of the chair is a thing, but you have no access to anything but the information of the chair, not the chair itself if it exists at all in any other way".

Do you understand? It appears that the information is "referring" to "something else", but you have no access to that, nor do you know if it has any "independent existence" in any form (and it doesn't have any "independent existence" unless it is a receiver of information like you who receive particular information which "IS" you and "All you are", because there is no such thing as an "independent existence" really anyway, there is only "information which is received" and "how the information is perceived" "is the thing you have access to only".

This is not me making things up, this is logical deduction and truth. You do not have access to the "wall itself" but all that is being created in your experience or added to your creation is "information of the wall" and that is the "wall's only existence" in your world.

EXPLAINING GOD THROUGH REASON
UPDATED! ONLY LOGICAL NECESSITY

http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9676287
THE EASY RELIGION
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=59014
FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-17-2015 11:08 AM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #22
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
God could not make use of the "Will" if God could not "Decide". You will see all the "attributes of God" are those which are often absolutely necessary.

God "encompasses all information" but this gives people another wrong idea, that they are in some kind of "orb" or have a "place" "somewhere". God is not made of information, so is like nothing, and so God is not "encompassed by a location" nor "has boundaries" nor is "infinite in space" since "infinite space" and "boundaries" are both forms of information, but God is like nothing at all and is creating and destroying and creating information "within itself" only in a sense of our limited language ability, because there is "no place" but "God", there is no "space" or "location" all of it is just information and information has no "place" or "location" except "within God" who is "like nothing" so is not "empty space" either. In other words, "space" and "dimensions" and whatever else are just information we are receiving, they are "illusory" in a sense, yet "real" in that they are "real information which exists and is perceived by us" but there is no "location" for any of this besides "God" who is not "space" but the information is just being created by God "within God" but God should not be imagined as an "orb" or a "container" or a "box" or even "infinite space" since all those things are information and God is not at all information.

God is actively creating and destroying, which can be called "sustaining" but should not be thought of as "upholding what has an existence of its own that continues to operate fluidly without being destroyed and created anew in order to appear "animated".

The information which is created by God exists nowhere "else" but God, and there is no "place" in any sense, there is only "God" who is the "place" of everything, but God is not like a "park" or a "planet" but is "like nothing, nothing but God" and we can not by any means logically as I have laid forth here "wander" or "exist" or "continue" without "God doing it (because I explained how information ceases to exist in order to continue and only God is what is being referred to as that which is what is doing all of that)" that is "where", for lack of a better term, all this is being done by God, so in a sense "within God alone", there is no other "place" or any "space" but God, but God is not "space" which is just information created by God.

Again, these are not things I am just making up out of nowhere, they are logically necessary, they are not inventions of my own, and they are also additionally confirmed by the scriptures from around the world as well, but even if they never said these things (and they almost all do), they can be logically deduced as I am showing you, and there is no "other way", the logic is "air tight" so to speak, and none of this is a "proposed system of how it works" but these things "must be logically in place always" and these are only "Eternal Truths", and "Eternal Truths" are all "what must be" while "truth" in its little form can be any information that exists or exists "as truth" but logical necessities if they are carefully observed are only those which "must exist" in order to explain whatever, and the real and only "Eternal Truth" is literally God alone because unlike the "truth" or "falsehood" which are both just "information" the "Eternal Truth" is what "must exist" in order to "create the experience" of either "truth or falsehood" at any "moment".

Therefor, "truth" with a little t in this case, can be defined as "any information which exists" and "falsehood" can be defined as "any information which has no current existence or "reality".".

God is not "separate" but "encompasses all information within Himself" (and God is not a Him or a Her which are just "information" related to genitals in this moment of our reality), but is "separate" in the sense of not being dependent on information, but information being dependent on God in order to exist or be "animated" as explained above. God is "encompassing the information" and thus can be said to "know it", the "information" "is what it is". That means "what you are experiencing in particular IS the information you are experiencing in particular, it is not SOMETHING ELSE, you have no access to SOMETHING ELSE, the information IS exactly what you are receiving, you don't have access to anything but exactly the information you are receiving. This may be hard to understand, so I will continue to explain.

You have no access to the chair for example other than the "information of the chair" and that "information of the chair" is all that "exists in your experience" that is to say "the information of the chair is a thing, but you have no access to anything but the information of the chair, not the chair itself if it exists at all in any other way".

Do you understand? It appears that the information is "referring" to "something else", but you have no access to that, nor do you know if it has any "independent existence" in any form (and it doesn't have any "independent existence" unless it is a receiver of information like you who receive particular information which "IS" you and "All you are", because there is no such thing as an "independent existence" really anyway, there is only "information which is received" and "how the information is perceived" "is the thing you have access to only".

This is not me making things up, this is logical deduction and truth. You do not have access to the "wall itself" but all that is being created in your experience or added to your creation is "information of the wall" and that is the "wall's only existence" in your world.

EXPLAINING GOD THROUGH REASON
UPDATED! ONLY LOGICAL NECESSITY

http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9676287
THE EASY RELIGION
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=59014
FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-17-2015 11:10 AM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #23
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
(As a side note here, one should think about how "what we experience is what we are" and how then we might be consider being compassionate, since doing harm to what is in your experience, is doing harm to what only exists for you and what you are and are made of, so basically like hurting an extension of what you "are" and thus making your own experience full of suffering, making your own self suffer by having suffering in "what you are" which is the information you receive).

So God "knows it all" not the way people imagine, the way we think of objects as having an existence apart from the information we receive of them, but the information we receive of them "are" their own thing, they "are" the thing, there is no "other", and so God knows whatever information exists (which is that which is experienced, that which is known, that which is perceived, those ARE the tings, those things don't have independent existences unless they are receiving information, and God is the one creating all the information that exists "within" itself), thus is in a sense "experiencing all the experiences" which "are" the information, and experiencing whatever else that God might create as experiences that only God experiences and not others of those who experience within God (limited sets of information reception any moment).

So if you imagine a board with moving pictures on it, God encompasses all those moving pictures and is viewing them all, while the moving pictures are "limited" in the information they are perceiving any "moment", they can only see what information they are receiving or is being created in that box, while God is "informed of" all "information" it is creating for all the boxes and those exclusively experienced by God, but there is no information that exists or can exist "apart" from God as in "unviewed" or "unknown", because "information only exists as it is what informs, what is made known, what is experienced in some form" "it is the experience itself, and you are the experience when it is happening, it is a part of what you are at that moment" and if God doesn't create it, it can't exist, and if God doesn't experience it, it isn't information at all, and only God alone is non-information. So it is that anything that ceases to exist is thus called "returned to God", in that it is no longer experiencing information and no longer having an existence or experiencing a limited set of information so is not "individuated" by "being information" or a "set of information" and so "has no existence of its own". Behind everything is this Nothing that Is and Does All. The "individual" can not "experience being God" really, because you would have no "you" to experience in that case, and so no "you" would be experiencing anything. Thus no one can ever truly "be" God for this reason, because "they" that limited set of information, would not exist, and God is Annihilation of all that because God is not information at all.

Why I went into this, is because what suffering you experience, is information specifically created by God, and God is encompassing that information (the suffering, the events, every aspect of the experience IS the information, it is not referring to something else, but IS the thing that is being created), and thus is "experiencing" it too, because if it is not "experienced" it is not "information" and "does not exist", and so God is, however blasphemous it may seem, the one who is Compassionate by definition, because Compassion means to "suffer with", and it is a quality that nothing truly has, because no matter what, we are never experiencing the information another is experiencing exactly as they are experiencing it, or else we would be them and not "us", while God is encompassing all their information entirely, and the information that "is" all others and creates it and destroys it and creates anew. God does not "suffer" the way we "suffer" in the sense that we "suffer" due to our lack of ability to stop it or experience anything else, but God does exactly "experience" the information exactly as "we know it" or "we experience it" because "the way it is experienced" "IS the information itself" there is no "other information" that we have access too, the information "IS" the experience itself the way it is.

Please read that all carefully if it is hard to understand. Not any of it is invention, it is completely based on logical deduction and necessity. It is not "necessary" for "God to create information" or "create specifically this information we experience whenever we experience it and how we experience it" but it is necessary that in order for it to "be information" it must "inform" in order to "exist" and it "informing the way it informs" "is its existence" and "God is the one experiencing it all" or "informed of all of it" and God "being informed of it" IS "its existence" because if it is not "informing" it is not "information" and "does not exist".

Lets move on to the next question:

"Why are we created?"

In our experience of information, we appear to be "dependent" ultimately on "causation" or "conditions" and even our actions are "defined and refined by conditions" which appear to push us, and constrain our power or ability to act and shape it. In other words, we have the impression of being driven by circumstances and once pushed, constrained by circumstances, like being pushed through a funnel. Yet all that drives us and constrains us in our impression is "information" in its appearance. God exists when there is no information before or after God, thus no "conditions" or "circumstances", but God creates all those experiences of "driving" and "constraining" factors in our experience, and ultimately the experience itself that moment as it is, but never had such factors around (and it is impossible as I explained for those factors to have existed or constrain God or drive God since they are information and God is the one that creates information and is not constrained by information but encompasses it and is "beyond" it in that sense as it is dependent on God to exist in whatever forms it may be experienced or "exist"(which is only it being experienced)).

Since God had no factors like that, the answer to the question of "Why" is thus, that since God had nothing to drive it, nor anything to confine it, God Freely Decided and Freely Willed and Freely brought about the generation of whatever particular information in a moment and in the way that God did (God is not confined or driven by "time" either which is just a perception created in some experiences and a concept created by God within God not outside of God or having any existence except within some experiences God creates). So even in this, God is unlike us, as we have the impression of circumstances driving us, while God has no circumstances driving God, it is complete and true Free Will and being the Smith of His own Will, the Will Smith, and the only truly Free Will, that is entirely unconditioned by circumstances and un-driven by any other power or plight.

So in that sense, there is no "why" or "reason" other than "God creates what God wills". Which is what I was trying to say to people, and they thought I wasn't answering their question! I was answering their question in the ONLY PROPER WAY THAT IT CAN BE ANSWERED. It is not a matter of "we don't know, it could have had some reason" because if it "had a reason" that would mean what is being proposed is that "God is conditioned by information such as "circumstances" or anything else" and that is what I was saying is a tremendous blasphemy and untruth, which they might not even realize they are making, because it is putting information such as "reasons" or "circumstances" above God as driving factors, or below God as confining factors, or around God as partners that shape the decisions of God, while GOD ALONE IS THE WILL SMITH. This is not me just saying that, I have explained with pure and strict logic why that is ABSOLUTELY THE CASE, it is not that I am "proposing a system" or "it is just a theory" no, I am only saying what MUST be, there is NO OTHER WAY IT CAN BE, and if you don't see that, then you have not followed the logic properly, and have misunderstood my statements and do not have any understanding of why what I am saying is how it is ultimately and why it can not be another way at all and is not just some "system" like how people make up "systems" and "this is how it works" but "this is how it MUST work" it is logical necessity, that in order to get these results, these are the components required as they needed.

So God CAN NOT "have a reason driving the actions of God" besides "God's FREE WILL" which is God's unique ability, because no one other than God alone is truly THE FREE ONE. "FreedomStands" can be taken as a reference to that, that God alone who is Free, is the one who "remains" (as in "stands").

I am talking about that, but I am information, experiencing a drive and confinement by circumstances of information experienced by me. I am not God, and no one is God but God alone, and God is like Nothing, both in the sense of being Unlike anything and in the sense of literally being like Nothing as in not being made of any information at all. Our "drive" is information, God's "drive" is intrinsic, self-driven Power to Will and Will to Power and the ability to DECIDE. To Decide to will some experience into existence, and to DECIDE or DECISIVE ability (Judgment/Distinguishing) is necessary for God to be able to DO anything, because if God could DO or NOT DO but could not DECIDE, then NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN. But God produced the CHOICES and God MADE THE DECISION, and that is why anything exists as it exists in any "moment" or "now". This can not be done without DECISION, thus those who say "God/Nature has no mind, is blind and does not know" are wrong, because Knowing is the Existence of Anything, Knowing is Seeing, and Decisive Ability is absolutely NECESSARY for anything to exist as I have logically shown here, there can be NO OTHER WAY. The idea of a "thoughtless creator" is absolutely unfounded and illogical, but people do not think very far or very logically so they think it "makes sense" or "must be" but they don't even use their minds to see how that is IMPOSSIBLE, it isn't an OPTION even, it isn't even a POSSIBILITY, and that is not just ME being a Fanatic about it, it is because without DECISIVE ABILITY no ACTION can be TAKEN.

My God, thank you for blessing me with so much logic, and making me the one to say these things and understand these things, and please guide others into my experience who might also come to know! Thank you also for inspiring in me all this, and such prayers, as I could never know if you did not tell me! Please do not take away this knowledge from me or my experience, but keep me as the foremost and best who know you and speak of you! Bless me with the most and the best blessings and gifts and experiences forever and always! Thank you for everything master! You have been most wonderful to me! You decided for me to specifically exist as I do, to be beautiful in conduct and speech, and whatever good you have given me, it is all from you, and all credit belongs to you! You are and have always been THE DECIDER! All praise be to you! All praise belongs to you! There is NO OTHER. Please always keep me grateful and the most excellent and wonderful and highest and foremost of your honored elect of servants!

All of you can pray for that and potentially accomplish that! God can make all of you the best in an instant or in phases or not at all or sometimes or never or always! All is easy for God who has nothing confining or restricting His DECREE or DECISION or POWER or FREE WILL, and so God can make something true easily, and can make something false easily, and can make something as if it never existed, and can make something as if it always existed, the ideas of "never" and "always" or "sequential time" or "chronology of events" only "exist" as "parts of experiences" they are just "information" that "is part of some experience" at any moment, and thus "illusory" in the sense that they can easily be rendered non existent, and are just information which can freely be destroyed and exchanged, and there is only "now" and "this moment" with God who has "always been" as "time" is only a concept that God created in some experienced, God is not confined by it, and we are within God, and our experiences are only existing "now", "we" do not "exist" anywhere "else" simultaneously, because something that is not experiencing the information we are experiencing "now" is "not really us" "as we are this moment" and "all we ever are is the information we are experiencing this moment".

EXPLAINING GOD THROUGH REASON
UPDATED! ONLY LOGICAL NECESSITY

http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9676287
THE EASY RELIGION
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=59014
(This post was last modified: 01-17-2015 11:11 AM by FreedomStands.)
FreedomStands
Registered User
User ID: 273192
01-17-2015 11:13 AM

Posts: 34,661



Post: #24
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
"Why are we here on Earth?"

Once you understand what I have said above, and understand God's Free Will that is unconfined by conditions, the Qur'an's words make a great deal of sense as answers to all these questions. God freely created the experience of Earth and the way it is experienced as a "habitation" or "condition" for "mankind to experience". Earth was created as the "reason" for "mankind" (that means that Earth was created in the experience of some humans as the atmosphere or habitation which drives them and confines them and is often their reason or explanation for doing what they do and how they do it), and the "reason" ultimately for "all of it and anything ever ultimately" is that "God freely willed so".

"What is our destination?"

Every moment that is lost, every moment that was "before" and therefor "destroyed" is "returned to God", thus the "Journeying is to God" every moment even, and "God" is ALWAYS the destination, no matter what we are experiencing, the "place" is God, the only STABLE or REMAINING or NON-TRANSITORY, or ETERNAL FACTOR that is in a sense "STILL" and "ALWAYS",

Every time you experience skipped moments, which could be constantly, but particularly when you experience a "dreamless sleep" which is like "death" you are "returned to God" and even now, your location is God and your Journey through experiences and your Beginning and End and Beginning Again are All to God Alone and with God Alone.

"What really happens after our death?"

If you are dead by the definition I am giving the word, "you" are not existing, as in "you" are not "experiencing information" and "experiencing information" or "being informed" is "all you are ever any moment". To say "any moment" means "no matter what the moment may appear as" as you only ever experience "this moment".

The entire "period" in which you do not experience information and thus do not exist in any real sense unless you are experiencing information (and thus alive in some way by my definition), is "skipped" as "non-information can not be experienced in any way" and so the only thing you can experience "next" is "new information" and according to the Qur'an that will be the information given to you regarding your Resurrection and return to life, but no matter what, know that death if it is to be a real death means you will not receive any information or have any existence, just like before you were born, and no matter "how long it takes" ("time" and "time perception" merely being created information in some peoples experiences) you will be skipped right to the moment you experience any information of any kind in any way as "as you" or "the experiencer who you know is you or who you feel now is you". Thus also, are the "guilty" those who "know themselves as those people who did those things" meaning that their "information about themselves" and "their existence" and "what they know themselves as" is by those "memories" which "exist in the moment" and "how they know themselves" and thus are they "obviously guilty, even to themselves, and speak out against themselves" because "their evil conduct from their past which make up their memories is how they are defined or what they deem themselves to be in the present", but it is God alone "informing them of what they did" that is "creating in whatever moment the memories of their conduct which they define themselves by and consider themselves to be" and "we are whatever God informs us we are" and are all thus "the creations and slaves of God only".

"How can we make spiritual progress?"

By doing what you can do when you can do it towards what you strategically and logically deem the least inducing of harm in the short and the long term, the worst harm being the most lasting kind, and seeking pleasure in the short and the long term, the best pleasure being the most lasting kind of pleasure! People often mistakenly take the word "pleasure" to mean "sin" while "sin" literally means "harm" and in my definition the "highest goal" is to attain the most lasting pleasure or "positive experience, peace, satisfaction" which is Paradise or an Eternal Paradise existence and experience, while the worst and most lasting kind of harm is the Punishment in Hell, or an Eternally Hellish existence of suffering, pain, anxiety, and torture.

We basically have to, as far as we seem to be able at any moment, strategically operate in order to do what is most pleasure inducing and try to save ourselves from harm in this life and potential harm in the afterlife, so charity, meditative exercises related to God for our own health and sake and future (worship), and things like that generally. Being kind and compassionate, and "doing unto everything where possible as you would have God do unto you". So if you want to seek the mercy of God, be merciful and compassionate and kind, and if you want the gifts of God, be generous, and pray for whatever you want as well earnestly knowing that God can without a doubt grant you any sort of information in your experience and that it is easy for God, but that God alone is The Decider. One can also look back about what I said regarding compassion here and how everything that comes into our experience only exists "as that", meaning in that specific way, in our experience, and so in a sense their existence in that form exactly is only in our experience and part of us, so extending kindness to all those that seem to experience information and even those that do not seem to should be a priority to keep. Be kind to all the animals, and meditate also about how they are not really different from you, how you too go about and seek food in your life and struggle with circumstances, and make life gentle and give them ease as you would want ease, and feed them as you would want to be fed, and do not frighten them or harm them or cause anxiety in them just how you would not want anxiety or distress caused in you, so do unto others as you would have God do unto you, and be the most wonderful person you can imagine, and eschew all evil conduct from your behavior, and do not be the cause of suffering or cruelty but be merciful, for the cruel are said to be thrown in the fire, as they made life "hell" for people in many cases, even by fighting and harassing them, and so "hell" will be made for them, and God has decided all these things and God has not made an error but creates all of them and the manifestly cruel are said to have their home in hell.

"What is consciousness?

It is the experience of any information.

Thank you for asking these questions, and if anyone reads my answers, please let me know! I hope you like them and do not misunderstand them as so many seem to!

EXPLAINING GOD THROUGH REASON
UPDATED! ONLY LOGICAL NECESSITY

http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php...pid9676287
THE EASY RELIGION
http://lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=59014
Ghenghis
Registered User
User ID: 267064
01-17-2015 11:14 AM

Posts: 12,496



Post: #25
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
LOL who the f*#k is going to read all that bullshit?
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 231468
01-17-2015 11:36 AM

 



Post: #26
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)


Counting Sheep staff
Moderator
User ID: 231468
01-17-2015 11:54 AM

Posts: 44,575



Post: #27
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-17-2015 11:36 AM)


^- sorry FS and welcome back

That was me.
Popcorn
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 91621
01-17-2015 12:00 PM

 



Post: #28
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
Ghenghis  Wrote: (01-17-2015 11:14 AM)
LOL who the f*#k is going to read all that bullshit?

I find you most disagreeable but you've called this one right. Why put all that time and energy into it when it matters not a twit.
Counting Sheep staff
Moderator
User ID: 231468
01-17-2015 12:10 PM

Posts: 44,575



Post: #29
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-17-2015 12:00 PM)
Ghenghis  Wrote: (01-17-2015 11:14 AM)
LOL who the f*#k is going to read all that bullshit?

I find you most disagreeable but you've called this one right. Why put all that time and energy into it when it matters not a twit.

If it matters to those who would kill for it it matters to those of us it matters not to.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 274814
01-17-2015 12:17 PM

 



Post: #30
RE: THIS MAY ANSWER MANY QUESTIONS! (__)
Walls of text are ignored.

When God communicates, it is with Its very Presence, not serial/parallel progressive chains of timed expressions (the way the human brain functions).
Advertisement










Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication