news A Strange Case of the CIA and UFO Researchers
news MKULTRA Victims File Lawsuit
news Teddy Roosevelt's Account of a Bigfoot Encounter
news Europe’s Oldest Tree Is At Least 1,230 Years Old And Still Growing
news Davy Crockett's Bigfoot Sighting
news What Are the Implications of Quantum Mechanics?
news Supernatural Cars on the Highways
news Mormons, Aliens, and Hangar 18
news The startup that wants you to 'live to 130 in the body of a 22-year-old'
news Is your cell phone being tracked?
news Octopuses are space aliens, scientists claim

Password: or Register
Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Arctic Sea Ice Extent at Record Lows as Temps Soar and Sea Level Rise Accelerates
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 1337
05-16-2018 12:48 PM

Posts: 7,761

Post: #61
RE: Arctic Sea Ice Extent at Record Lows as Temps Soar and Sea Level Rise Accelerates
In recently revealed internal document, Shell Oil acknowledged in 1988 the need to “defend against a sea level rise” and other impacts of climate change. That document could now play a major role in a climate change-related lawsuit currently pending against the company.

The acknowledgment came in an internal company report entitled “The Greenhouse Effect,” which was marked confidential but is among 38 documents recently unearthed by Jelmer Mommers, a climate and energy journalist for the Dutch news organization De Correspondent. It contains information directly relevant to a suit filed against the company last year in federal court in Rhode Island by the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF), which alleged Shell has failed to protect the Providence Terminal from the impacts of sea level rise.

“It’s essentially an admission on Shell’s part that the risks we’ve identified in our case are real and imminent,” said Bradley Campbell, president of the CLF, which filed the lawsuit against the oil giant last August.

In the suit, CLF alleges that Shell has failed to account for climate-related impacts that will threaten the Providence Terminal, including rising seas, increases in the intensity of heavy rainfall and more extreme weather events.

Specifically, CLF argues that Shell is violating the conditions of its Clean Water Act permits by failing to prevent and adequately monitor unlawful discharges of pollution into the river and by failing to adequately plan for increasing amounts of stormwater runoff caused by climate change.

“Preparation for spills and other releases of hazardous substances is especially important at the Providence Terminal given its vulnerability to coastal flooding caused by sea level rise, increased and/or more intense precipitation, increased magnitude and frequency of storm events, and increased magnitude and frequency of storm surges – all of which will become, and are becoming, worse as a result of climate change,” said CLF in the suit, adding that public records indicate the facility’s stormwater drainage and treatment system cannot effectively handle large precipitation events.

Shell filed a motion to dismiss in January, saying CLF’s claims about the risks are “highly speculative, remote or hypothetical” and “wholly unrelated” to the company.

The newly revealed “The Greenhouse Effect” report, however, appears to support CLF’s contention that Shell has known these risks for decades and they are far from speculative or hypothetical. The report was based on a study completed in 1986 and lists several climate change-related implications for the energy industry. At the top of the list are consequences to coastal facilities that can be expected from rising seas.

Sea levels have already risen about 8 inches compared to pre-industrial times, dramatically increasing storm surge and flooding from storms like Superstorm Sandy and Typhoon Haiyan. It has dramatically increased the frequency of everyday high-tide flooding in cities all along the U.S. coastline.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects that if emissions continue on their current pace, sea levels could rise another 39 inches by 2100. By 2050, as many as 26 major U.S. cities will face an “emerging flooding crisis.”

Shell’s report acknowledged these risks to its business and facilities. “Direct operational consequences can be expected from a rising sea level, impacting offshore installations, coastal facilities and operations (e.g. platforms, harbors, refineries, depots) with an uncertain magnitude,” Shell’s report said.

The report also shows that Shell estimated it was responsible for at least 4 percent of total global carbon emissions in 1984. That figure could be used to counter Shell’s contention that Rhode Island’s climate impacts are unrelated to the company.

Shell, which is based in the Netherlands, is also being sued by a group in that country, Friends of the Earth Netherlands / Milieudefensie, based largely on the content of the documents unearthed by Mommers. That group seeks to compel the company to adhere to the Netherlands’ goals as promised in the Paris Climate Agreement.

Quote this message in a reply

Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication