News
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons
news How plants reclaimed Chernobyl's poisoned land
news First Robot Arm Controlled by Thought Alone
news By 2050, many U.S. cities will have weather like they’ve never seen
news The Unexplained Mystery Boom Phenomenon Continues Worldwide
news Scientists fear end to Mankind not 'decades away' but 'much sooner'


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 11 Vote(s) - 2.82 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 495829
04-15-2019 12:06 PM

 



Post: #61
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
Advertisement
Disturbed  Wrote: (04-15-2019 12:01 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 11:47 AM)
It didn’t even seem like much of a personal attack. Are we getting that sensitive around here now?

"You are unhinged" is not an argument. (Unless you consider ad-hominem a valid argument)

And yes, when very specific posting guidelines have been issued we are getting that sensitive now. Our leniency got us in this mess in the first place.

Both friendliness and quality of threads need to go up.

This place was founded on “Its almost impossible to get banned here” due to the ban happy other place am I right? The fact that LOP wasn’t overly sensitive about things back then made this place great. It’s like we’ve lost sight of things around here and given into the PC culture.
Quote this message in a reply
Disturbed staff
Finger lickin' good
User ID: 1
04-15-2019 12:21 PM

Posts: 4,815



Post: #62
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 11:55 AM)
Is it ok to post smilies now? I’ll be honest, some of the smilies can be construed as be antagonizing like the “ok f-cktard” one for example. I think you have ones with the middle finger too.

Good point. I removed the "ok-f-cktard, smilie. It even looks mean lol. The middle finger smilies are at least somewhat funny and the Hifuck is at least somewhat friendly. chuckle

[Image: mybbsig.php]
Quote this message in a reply
#1 Doomologist
Registered User
User ID: 436526
04-15-2019 12:22 PM

Posts: 4,827



Post: #63
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
He Man  Wrote: (04-14-2019 11:12 PM)
Eldog Wilbury  Wrote: (04-14-2019 09:32 PM)
Is this raw story article one of those original thoughts you claim to post?

It is a Rawstory article based on an ABC TV interview. I do often add my thoughta to threads I post and in other people's threads I post into.

What is your point?

his point is you are off your rocker old man...
now get back to work greeting the incoming customers there at walmart...
chuckle

#ForumLivesMatter See Something Say Something...
Heartflowers
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 437028
04-15-2019 12:27 PM

 



Post: #64
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
Disturbed  Wrote: (04-15-2019 12:21 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 11:55 AM)
Is it ok to post smilies now? I’ll be honest, some of the smilies can be construed as be antagonizing like the “ok f-cktard” one for example. I think you have ones with the middle finger too.

Good point. I removed the "ok-f-cktard, smilie. It even looks mean lol. The middle finger smilies are at least somewhat funny and the Hifuck is at least somewhat friendly. chuckle

That train has ran. You will never get this place back to it's former glory with the 3 stooges and their free hand do do as they please.

Enjoy your journey into obscurity.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483092
04-15-2019 12:47 PM

 



Post: #65
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
Fork  Wrote: (04-15-2019 05:08 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 05:06 AM)

You’re an idiot and have zero understanding of the law.

THOUSANDS of people have been convicted of lesser obstruction crimes attempting to dodge more serious crimes.

Here’s an example. Let’s say a defendant murders someone, and somehow manages to break into the evidence room and destroy the DNA evidence or is caught red handed bribing the scientists doing the testing to skew the results or contaminant the sample.

That person might no longer have a body of evidence against them sufficient enough to get a murder one conviction, but their obstruction crimes will still clearly land them in prison.

In Trumps case, felony obstruction is preferable to treason.

He is a traitor and obviously guilty.

The level of denial from Trump supporters is beyond comprehension.

What if you aren't a Trump supporter and don't think any of this will amount to anything and that he may be reelected because the opposition party is shooting itself in the foot?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 497571
04-15-2019 01:32 PM

 



Post: #66
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
Disturbed  Wrote: (04-15-2019 12:21 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 11:55 AM)
Is it ok to post smilies now? I’ll be honest, some of the smilies can be construed as be antagonizing like the “ok f-cktard” one for example. I think you have ones with the middle finger too.

Good point. I removed the "ok-f-cktard, smilie. It even looks mean lol. The middle finger smilies are at least somewhat funny and the Hifuck is at least somewhat friendly. chuckle

Where do you draw the line though? At least you’re eliminating some of the loopholes I guess. It’s better to be consistent if those are the guidelines now.
Quote this message in a reply
Alian2
Registered User
User ID: 441655
04-15-2019 02:14 PM

Posts: 8,894



Post: #67
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
#1 Doomologist  Wrote: (04-15-2019 12:22 PM)
He Man  Wrote: (04-14-2019 11:12 PM)
It is a Rawstory article based on an ABC TV interview. I do often add my thoughta to threads I post and in other people's threads I post into.

What is your point?

his point is you are off your rocker old man...
now get back to work greeting the incoming customers there at walmart...
chuckle

You post this right after someone else was banned for calling someone "unhinged"?

It won't be long until this place is empty.

Anon
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 497585
04-15-2019 02:21 PM

 



Post: #68
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
Michael-AK  Wrote: (04-15-2019 02:14 PM)
#1 Doomologist  Wrote: (04-15-2019 12:22 PM)
his point is you are off your rocker old man...
now get back to work greeting the incoming customers there at walmart...
chuckle

You post this right after someone else was banned for calling someone "unhinged"?

It won't be long until this place is empty.

Anon

Too many loopholes.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 338591
04-15-2019 03:13 PM

 



Post: #69
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
Michael-AK  Wrote: (04-15-2019 02:14 PM)
#1 Doomologist  Wrote: (04-15-2019 12:22 PM)
his point is you are off your rocker old man...
now get back to work greeting the incoming customers there at walmart...
chuckle

You post this right after someone else was banned for calling someone "unhinged"?

It won't be long until this place is empty.

Anon
Team lefty is f*cking it right into the shitheap of history
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
04-15-2019 03:46 PM

Posts: 26,947



Post: #70
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
He Man  Wrote: (04-14-2019 08:12 PM)
And there is reason for the White House to be concerned. According to Karl, no one on the president’s legal team ever debriefed McGahn about what he told the special counsel."

Link to article and ABC clip:
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/new-pan...t-concern/

:thumbup













Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 495885
04-15-2019 03:48 PM

 



Post: #71
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
:STFU:
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
04-15-2019 03:57 PM

Posts: 26,947



Post: #72
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
[Image: 3GLH8pF.jpg]
[Image: alexjonesderpstate.jpg?w=441&h=331]



Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 440867
04-15-2019 04:46 PM

 



Post: #73
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
He Man  Wrote: (04-15-2019 01:54 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 01:33 AM)
When Trump gets re-elected please don't hang yourself HeMao.

Awww that is so sweet that you care about my mental health and potential for depression if Trump were to get re-elected. I think most experts give him about a 2% chance of that currently.

If it happens I will be sad but then I will do what I did this last time and fight against Trump's stupid policies and autocratic tendencies with more vim and vigor than ever.

Thanks again for caring about me. Hugs Cheer

Goldman says otherwise. Betting he gets re-elected.

Must suck to be you.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 497599
04-15-2019 04:59 PM

 



Post: #74
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 04:46 PM)
He Man  Wrote: (04-15-2019 01:54 AM)
Awww that is so sweet that you care about my mental health and potential for depression if Trump were to get re-elected. I think most experts give him about a 2% chance of that currently.

If it happens I will be sad but then I will do what I did this last time and fight against Trump's stupid policies and autocratic tendencies with more vim and vigor than ever.

Thanks again for caring about me. Hugs Cheer

Goldman says otherwise. Betting he gets re-elected.

Must suck to be you.

Please try to be a little more friendlier.

Thanks!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 307864
04-16-2019 07:48 AM

 



Post: #75
RE: Panic at WH after briefing on Mueller report: ‘significant concern’ over obstruct
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-15-2019 05:06 AM)
Natura Naturans  Wrote: (04-14-2019 08:18 PM)
If there is no crime, there is no obstruction. Simple as that. The Heman wants SO badly for there to be a crime, or at least obstruction, but it is patently obvious that there was none. Even Rosenstein says Barr is right, THERE WAS NO COLLUSION, AND NO OBSTRUCTION:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...416388002/


You’re an idiot and have zero understanding of the law.

THOUSANDS of people have been convicted of lesser obstruction crimes attempting to dodge more serious crimes.

Here’s an example. Let’s say a defendant murders someone, and somehow manages to break into the evidence room and destroy the DNA evidence or is caught red handed bribing the scientists doing the testing to skew the results or contaminant the sample.

That person might no longer have a body of evidence against them sufficient enough to get a murder one conviction, but their obstruction crimes will still clearly land them in prison.

In Trumps case, felony obstruction is preferable to treason.

He is a traitor and obviously guilty.
Actually it depends on who you are and who your friends are.
Example
I suppose deleting 30,000 + emails, smashing smart phones with hammers, wiping hard-drives is not considered obstruction!!! Not to mention the mishandling of classified information. All of which was proven to be true and admitted to by those who performed these acts. So for similar reasons the current Attorney General has the same leeway in their own interpretation of the evidence
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication