News
news The Unexplained Mystery Boom Phenomenon Continues Worldwide
news Scientists fear end to Mankind not 'decades away' but 'much sooner'
news Whitley Strieber reflects on his career
news 12-Year-Old Builds Fusion Reactor in His Family's Playroom
news Scientists build 'self-aware' robot able to repair itself
news Startup Plans to Send Pregnant Woman into Space to Give Birth
news Retailers sell out of macaroni and cheese with a 20-year shelf life
news Hunt for the Blackstar: On the Trail of the Military’s Secret 'Mothership'
news TV Series ‘Project Blue Book’ Is Based on a True UFO Story. Here It Is.
news The Mysterious Butterfly People of Missouri
news Drug to clear 'zombie cells' from body could be first anti-aging treatment


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
BeenThereDoneThat
Registered User
User ID: 501164
05-15-2019 03:17 AM

Posts: 633



Post: #1
unsure San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
Advertisement
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/us/fa...cisco.html


SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco, long at the heart of the technology revolution, took a stand against potential abuse on Tuesday by banning the use of facial recognition software by the police and other agencies.

The action, which came in an 8-to-1 vote by the Board of Supervisors, makes San Francisco the first major American city to block a tool that many police forces are turning to in the search for both small-time criminal suspects and perpetrators of mass carnage.

The authorities used the technology to help identify the suspect in the mass shooting at an Annapolis, Md., newspaper last June. But civil liberty groups have expressed unease about the technology’s potential abuse by government amid fears that it may shove the United States in the direction of an overly oppressive surveillance state.

Aaron Peskin, the city supervisor who sponsored the bill, said that it sent a particularly strong message to the nation, coming from a city transformed by tech.

I think part of San Francisco being the real and perceived headquarters for all things tech also comes with a responsibility for its local legislators,” Mr. Peskin said. “We have an outsize responsibility to regulate the excesses of technology precisely because they are headquartered here.”

But critics said that rather than focusing on bans, the city should find ways to craft regulations that acknowledge the usefulness of face recognition. “It is ridiculous to deny the value of this technology in securing airports and border installations,” said Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law expert at George Washington University. “It is hard to deny that there is a public safety value to this technology.”

There will be an obligatory second vote next week, but it is seen as a formality.

Similar bans are under consideration in Oakland and in Somerville, Mass., outside of Boston. In Massachusetts, a bill in the State Legislature would put a moratorium on facial recognition and other remote biometric surveillance systems. On Capitol Hill, a billintroduced last month would ban users of commercial face recognition technology from collecting and sharing data for identifying or tracking consumers without their consent, although it does not address the government’s uses of the technology.

Matt Cagle, a lawyer with the A.C.L.U. of Northern California, on Tuesday summed up the broad concerns of facial recognition: The technology, he said, “provides government with unprecedented power to track people going about their daily lives. That’s incompatible with a healthy democracy.”


The San Francisco proposal, he added, “is really forward-looking and looks to prevent the unleashing of this dangerous technology against the public.”

In one form or another, facial recognition is already being used in many American airports and big stadiums, and by a number of other police departments. The pop star Taylor Swift has reportedly incorporated the technology at one of her shows, using it to help identify stalkers.

The facial recognition fight in San Francisco is largely theoretical — the police department does not currently deploy such technology, and it is only in use at the international airport and ports that are under federal jurisdiction and are not impacted by the legislation.

Some local homeless shelters use biometric finger scans and photos to track shelter usage, said Jennifer Friedenbach, the executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness. The practice has driven undocumented residents away from the shelters, she said.

Rest of the article in the linkie :


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/us/fa...cisco.html

E pluribus f*#k that
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 453356
05-15-2019 06:16 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
Only the local police state has ban it.chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397180
05-15-2019 06:22 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
I would rather have facial recognition than biometric implants.

Implants can be programmed to adhere to a double standard. Member of the elite? You get a free pass. Facial recognition can't do that, which is why I think this is being banned.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397180
05-15-2019 06:23 PM

 



Post: #4
RE: San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
Facial recognition is also easily identifiable to any human. You don't have to know how to program or use computers to remember someone's face. It's second nature to us.

It would allow easy and just rule of law, which is why it cannot be tolerated in a kakistocracy.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 501149
05-15-2019 06:57 PM

 



Post: #5
RE: San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 500516
05-16-2019 03:46 AM

 



Post: #6
RE: San Fran first US city to ban facial recognition
fake news. you are misleading people.
Quote this message in a reply








Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication