News
news New biometric database can identify people through scars, tattoos and even their voice
news Cattle Are Being Mutilated And Killed In Eastern Oregon
news Insider Interview on Skinwalker Ranch History
news Squirrels Can Speak Bird
news US Navy pilot says mystery ‘dark mass’ emerged from ocean and swallowed torpedo
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 431928
05-15-2019 11:42 PM

 




Post: #46
RE: Chernobyl .....
Advertisement
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-15-2019 11:16 PM)
That is one type of cancer. The other basic type is simply erosive, corrosive, death of tissue, malignancy.

Both are associated with ”no future” as a mental reaction.”

So much fear and so many assumptions where to start, chuckle

A tumor is a calcium mass created in the body by the body, there is no radioactive particle in the body, as that would be a massive energy particle.

No one ever dies from the tumor, they can live for decades with a tumor, but the tumor is a energy sink, it sucks all the energy from other organs that when those fail, the person dies.

Emotions create Cancer, fear is the number one, that sets up a condition in the body that creates the tumor mass of calcium.

But feel free to disagree, you have a lot of words to back up your assumptions, chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
travel assistant
lop guest
User ID: 414449
05-15-2019 11:57 PM

 




Post: #47
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
If hiroshima and nagasaki were nuked not firestormed how is it that people are still living there and procreating today.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452751
05-16-2019 12:04 AM

 




Post: #48
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
travel assistant  Wrote: (05-15-2019 11:57 PM)
If hiroshima and nagasaki were nuked not firestormed how is it that people are still living there and procreating today.

https://www.differencebetween.com/differ...lear-bomb/
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 414449
05-16-2019 12:08 AM

 




Post: #49
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
Thanks 751 read it but it still does not answer my question.
Quote this message in a reply
1110.00)
lop guest
User ID: 480427
05-16-2019 12:16 AM

 




Post: #50
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
In my opinion intelligence networking--including out of body--precipitated the "accidents." Heck, vampires can out-of-body swarm to make a storm or earthquake.

A certain adolescent in Pennsylvania was "experimenting late at night" at the time of 3 Mile Island.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 499425
05-16-2019 12:23 AM

 




Post: #51
RE: Chernobyl Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-15-2019 11:42 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-15-2019 11:16 PM)
That is one type of cancer. The other basic type is simply erosive, corrosive, death of tissue, malignancy.

Both are associated with ”no future” as a mental reaction.”

So much fear and so many assumptions where to start, chuckle

A tumor is a calcium mass created in the body by the body, there is no radioactive particle in the body, as that would be a massive energy particle.

No one ever dies from the tumor, they can live for decades with a tumor, but the tumor is a energy sink, it sucks all the energy from other organs that when those fail, the person dies.

Emotions create Cancer, fear is the number one, that sets up a condition in the body that creates the tumor mass of calcium.

But feel free to disagree, you have a lot of words to back up your assumptions, chuckle

You are categorically incorrect, it is not fear or hysteria that is the trouble, but the increases of stress and madness, in today's society that is causality to these cancers, even in the young - one cannot possibly blame fear, if it is affecting even the youth?

?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 500017
05-16-2019 12:52 AM

 




Post: #52
RE: Chernobyl .....
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 12:23 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-15-2019 11:42 PM)
So much fear and so many assumptions where to start, chuckle

A tumor is a calcium mass created in the body by the body, there is no radioactive particle in the body, as that would be a massive energy particle.

No one ever dies from the tumor, they can live for decades with a tumor, but the tumor is a energy sink, it sucks all the energy from other organs that when those fail, the person dies.

Emotions create Cancer, fear is the number one, that sets up a condition in the body that creates the tumor mass of calcium.

But feel free to disagree, you have a lot of words to back up your assumptions, chuckle

You are categorically incorrect, it is not fear or hysteria that is the trouble, but the increases of stress and madness, in today's society that is causality to these cancers, even in the young - one cannot possibly blame fear, if it is affecting even the youth?

?

Fear is number one, stress is the result of fear, as is madness, but they are all emotional causations.

Even a baby in the womb can experience fear or stress, that is how they develop the tumors at that age, it comes from the fear and stress that the mother feels.

That is why you never do chemotherapy, because if you do not understand the causation, destroying the immune system and the bone marrow production system to just reduce the calcium tumor may only solve that issue temporarily, yet the side effects kill the patient anyway.

Most cancers are created by the human to end the life, it just needs the right conditions to develop and do its job.

The new science and medical technology has proven that cancer can easily be reversed, but the emotional issue of ending the life by the human that created it is still the overwhelming factor to the success of it.

That is why laughter is the best medicine for what ails them, chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452751
05-16-2019 01:23 AM

 




Post: #53
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 12:08 AM)
Thanks 751 read it but it still does not answer my question.

From Wiki re/ nuclear bombs
The most commonly used fissile materials for nuclear weapons applications have been uranium-235 and plutonium-239. Less commonly used has been uranium-233. Neptunium-237 and some isotopes of americium may be usable for nuclear explosives as well, but it is not clear that this has ever been implemented, and their plausible use in nuclear weapons is a matter of dispute
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon
We'd expect daughters of these Isotopes^^^^^ during fallout

Whereas nuclear energy plant meltdown
We usually find cesium237

So one difference is the type of isotope
And it's corresponding half life
(During each decay it loses an electron)
*
A shorter half life the more concentrated is damage to dna

Other accidents -
Nuclear-powered submarine accidents include the K-19 (1961), K-11 (1965), K-27 (1968), K-140 (1968), K-429 (1970), K-222 (1980), and K-431 (1985).[11][13][14] Serious radiation incidents/accidents include the Kyshtym disaster, Windscale fire, radiotherapy accident in Costa Rica,[15] radiotherapy accident in Zaragoza,[16] radiation accident in Morocco,[17] Goiania accident,[18] radiation accident in Mexico City, radiotherapy unit accident in Thailand,[19] and the Mayapuri radiological accident in India
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452751
05-16-2019 01:50 AM

 




Post: #54
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
The 50s

13 February 1950: a Convair B-36B crashed in northern British Columbia after jettisoning a Mark IV atomic bomb. This was the first such nuclear weapon loss in history.
12 December 1952: NRX AECL Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada. Partial meltdown, about 10,000 Curies released.[52] Approximately 1202 people were involved in the two year cleanup.[53] Future president Jimmy Carter was one of the many people that helped clean up the accident.[54]
15 March 1953 – Mayak, Former Soviet Union. Criticality accident. Contamination of plant personnel occurred.[51]
1 March 1954: The 15 Mt Castle Bravo shot of 1954 which spread considerable nuclear fallout on many Pacific islands, including several which were inhabited, and some that had not been evacuated.[55]
1 March 1954: Daigo Fukuryū Maru, Japanese fishing vessel contaminated by fallout from Castle Bravo, 1 fatality.
2 March 1954: US Navy tanker USS Patapsco contaminated by fallout from Castle Bravo while sailing from Enewetak Atoll to Pearl Harbor.
September 1957: a plutonium fire occurred at the Rocky Flats Plant, which resulted in the contamination of Building 71 and the release of plutonium into the atmosphere, causing US $818,600 in damage.
21 May 1957 - Mayak, Former Soviet Union. Criticality accident in the factory number 20 in the collection oxalate decantate after filtering sediment oxalate enriched uranium. Six people received doses of 300 to 1,000 rem (four women and two men), one woman died.[51]
29 September 1957: Kyshtym disaster: Nuclear waste storage tank explosion at the same Mayak plant, Russia. No immediate fatalities, though up to 200+ additional cancer deaths might have ensued from the radioactive contamination of the surrounding area; 270,000 people were exposed to dangerous radiation levels. Over thirty small communities were removed from Soviet maps between 1958 and 1991.[56] (INES level 6)[25]
October 1957: Windscale fire, UK. Fire ignites a "plutonium pile" (an air cooled, graphite moderated, uranium fuelled reactor that was used for plutonium and isotope production) and contaminates surrounding dairy farms.[10][57] An estimated 33 cancer deaths.[10][57]
1957-1964: Rocketdyne located at the Santa Susanna Field Lab, 30 miles north of Los Angeles, California operated ten experimental nuclear reactors. Numerous accidents occurred including a core meltdown. Experimental reactors of that era were not required to have the same type of containment structures that shield modern nuclear reactors. During the Cold War time in which the accidents that occurred at Rocketdyne, these events were not publicly reported by the Department of Energy.[58]
1958: Fuel rupture and fire at the National Research Universal reactor (NRU), Chalk River, Canada.
10 February 1958 - Mayak, Former Soviet Union. Criticality accident in SCR plant. Conducted experiments to determine the critical mass of enriched uranium in a cylindrical container with different concentrations of uranium in solution. Staff broke the rules and instructions for working with YADM (nuclear fissile material). When SCR personnel received doses from 7600 to 13,000 rem. Three people died, one man got radiation sickness and went blind.[51]
30 December 1958: Cecil Kelley criticality accident at Los Alamos National Laboratory.[51][59]
March 1959: Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Los Angeles, California. Fire in a fuel processing facility.
July 1959: Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Los Angeles, California. Partial meltdown
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_..._incidents
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 352770
05-16-2019 01:57 AM

 




Post: #55
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
IT IS SAFE IF DONE PROPERLY
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 500017
05-16-2019 02:07 AM

 




Post: #56
RE: Chernobyl .....
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 01:23 AM)
[



Whereas nuclear energy plant meltdown
We usually find cesium237

So one difference is the type of isotope
And it's corresponding half life
(During each decay it loses an electron)
*
A shorter half life the more concentrated is damage to dna
Yes the half life of thousands of years, so where did it go?
More fear mongering, chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452751
05-16-2019 02:16 AM

 




Post: #57
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 02:07 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 01:23 AM)
[



Whereas nuclear energy plant meltdown
We usually find cesium237

So one difference is the type of isotope
And it's corresponding half life
(During each decay it loses an electron)
*
A shorter half life the more concentrated is damage to dna
Yes the half life of thousands of years, so where did it go?
More fear mongering, chuckle

Cesium
The residue from fuku type meltdownx
Is only 30 or so years
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452751
05-16-2019 02:17 AM

 




Post: #58
RE: Chernobyl ..... Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 495765
05-16-2019 02:30 AM

 




Post: #59
RE: Chernobyl Watched 1st Episode / Who ever says Nuke plants safe full of sh*t !
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 12:52 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 12:23 AM)
You are categorically incorrect, it is not fear or hysteria that is the trouble, but the increases of stress and madness, in today's society that is causality to these cancers, even in the young - one cannot possibly blame fear, if it is affecting even the youth?

?

Fear is number one, stress is the result of fear, as is madness, but they are all emotional causations.

Even a baby in the womb can experience fear or stress, that is how they develop the tumors at that age, it comes from the fear and stress that the mother feels.

That is why you never do chemotherapy, because if you do not understand the causation, destroying the immune system and the bone marrow production system to just reduce the calcium tumor may only solve that issue temporarily, yet the side effects kill the patient anyway.

Most cancers are created by the human to end the life, it just needs the right conditions to develop and do its job.

The new science and medical technology has proven that cancer can easily be reversed, but the emotional issue of ending the life by the human that created it is still the overwhelming factor to the success of it.

That is why laughter is the best medicine for what ails them, chuckle

You do make a strong point, cannot disagree there, in so far as certain individuals may be concerned, but as for the rest, stressful lifestyles are being fiercely pushed on the population en masse, so there is bound to be a pattern of physiological ailments and other repercussions, but overall I agree that chemo is bad and to look to remedy the problem of cancer starting with ones own attitude toward life in general, and as a way not to take it too seriously - or not get too immersed or attached overall, and to be content, because the loss of ones inner peace is the greatest tragedy to ones well being, especially now to this societal 'norm' of disorder and chaos, one can lose themselves right quick to self-deception in this wave after wave of current extremes, and polarisation affecting the population. Humans, animals and plants are facing an existential Crisis at this point in time, many animals are also seeing increases in various cancers afflicting their bodies, trees on the other hand are dying from the top down due to solar radiation and other activities / efforts that are meant to block, refract or reflect said radiation via geo-engineering, which is having the side effect of causing the earth's soils to become neutralised, in other words it is contaminating the soil and water table, soon the only habitable places on earth will be the extreme southern hemisphere, which will have less pollution and contamination, plus their close proximity to antarctica and its supply of clean drinking water, which will become a growing problem for the rest of the earth. It is why the elites have chosen places like south america and new zealand / australia as their escape hideaways for when TSHTF.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 500017
05-16-2019 02:34 AM

 




Post: #60
RE: Chernobyl .....
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 02:16 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (05-16-2019 02:07 AM)
Yes the half life of thousands of years, so where did it go?
More fear mongering, chuckle

Cesium
The residue from fuku type meltdownx
Is only 30 or so years
You are not privy to what is used or was found there but the levels of radiation prove it was weapons grade enrichment that was being done at reactor number 1.

That stuff is supposed to last a bit longer, chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication