News
news New biometric database can identify people through scars, tattoos and even their voice
news Cattle Are Being Mutilated And Killed In Eastern Oregon
news Insider Interview on Skinwalker Ranch History
news Squirrels Can Speak Bird
news US Navy pilot says mystery ‘dark mass’ emerged from ocean and swallowed torpedo
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 9 Vote(s) - 2.78 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 05:50 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #16
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Advertisement
Travel assistant  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:22 PM)
I could give two hoots about this topic.
I just enjoyed pointing out the futility of discussing something that the outcome is predetermined.
Title is a type of oxymoron!

Spamming reported

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 05:59 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #17
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:27 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:17 PM)
Manning and Snowden considered themselves whistleblowers too. Didn't work out so well for them. The Dems seem to have learned from the Kavanaugh debacle. Had Ford not been scrutinized, but everyone just had to accept anything and everything she had said....


So if they suddenly rewrote the rules for whistleblowers, what approval process of those changes did they go through? Who approved the changes right before the whistle blower blew? Did those specific changes aid this particular whistle blower? Have others, in random cases, from a variety of fields and jobs been utilizing the new changes? What was grandfathered over? Changing rules opens the doors to a lot of what used to be no longer being viable. Can Manning and/or Snowden appeal and apply the new changes in retro? What else might they be able to reveal now?

It's cowardice on the democrats' part that they weren't protected.

If OP had his way Daniel Ellsberg would be executed in GITMO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers

You just compared Ellsberg to Manning, you cant be well in the head. Holy sh*t.

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 06:06 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #18
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:17 PM)
Let's just say you're the vice president or the secretary of state.

And you sit in on a phone call where the president agrees to sell weapons to Ukraine, but he needs a favor first.

First he wants them to investigate the DNC's favorite Wallstreet whore for the democrat nomination.

What do you do?

1)Cover it up. Move the communications to a secure server than have people send texts describing the conversation as clearly not being a quid pro quo a few days later.

2)Stonewall congress.

3)Resign.

4)Tell the president he's a dumbass. If he's asked the president of Ukraine to investigate Cofer Black and any other sketchy American executives operating in Ukraine without mentioning Biden, and without a quid pro quo.....

The president of Ukraine would have wanted to do that, and Biden would have been ensnared automatically.

Without getting impeached.

That's not related nor what happened though, the least bit
.., try to stay on the same plot. And please stop being subjective . It's not a good look.

You were wrong about Russian Collusion and now your amnesia is going to get you into another embarrassment.


Nice try though.

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 444179
10-09-2019 06:22 PM

 




Post: #19
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 04:55 PM)
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (10-09-2019 04:51 PM)
OP, this is just a Standards Law.
The Democrats have their own.
...and standard law and made up stuff apply to everyone else, not them. Bump

Correct, but someone has to call them out on their lies and deception. The Navy scenario is a perfect example how and where the Democrats have failed endlessly.

And you think YOU are calling them out by posting on a forum? You can debate all you want. Trump is getting impeached. The method does not matter. The right wing has perfected that idea.
Quote this message in a reply
UnAcceptance
Registered User
User ID: 519115
10-09-2019 06:29 PM

Posts: 2,093




Post: #20
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:22 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 04:55 PM)
Correct, but someone has to call them out on their lies and deception. The Navy scenario is a perfect example how and where the Democrats have failed endlessly.

And you think YOU are calling them out by posting on a forum? You can debate all you want. Trump is getting impeached. The method does not matter. The right wing has perfected that idea.

I guess we shall see you next November....the very night that Trump wins again!
Bitcoin bet?
Just one, please!!
If you don't do it, then you have already admitted that Trump has won.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471663
10-09-2019 06:31 PM

 




Post: #21
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:59 PM)
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:27 PM)
It's cowardice on the democrats' part that they weren't protected.

If OP had his way Daniel Ellsberg would be executed in GITMO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers

You just compared Ellsberg to Manning, you cant be well in the head. Holy sh*t.

Troubling isn't it! It's evident when you see it... Someone thinking they're educated while totally being clueless, its not education but indoctrination instead. They were taught what to think instead of how. Most are in student loan debt so deep...thinking they got their money's worth. In debt and indoctrinated. Believing they're smart. Believing. Knowing. Too blind to see, to deaf to hear, too dumb to understand... And in debt to become that way.
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
10-09-2019 06:34 PM

Posts: 12,498




Post: #22
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:31 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:59 PM)
You just compared Ellsberg to Manning, you cant be well in the head. Holy sh*t.

Troubling isn't it! It's evident when you see it... Someone thinking they're educated while totally being clueless, its not education but indoctrination instead. They were taught what to think instead of how. Most are in student loan debt so deep...thinking they got their money's worth. In debt and indoctrinated. Believing they're smart. Believing. Knowing. Too blind to see, to deaf to hear, too dumb to understand... And in debt to become that way.

I don't have any student debt.

Ellsberg and Manning is a good comparison.

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
10-09-2019 06:35 PM

Posts: 12,498




Post: #23
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:06 PM)
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (10-09-2019 05:17 PM)
Let's just say you're the vice president or the secretary of state.

And you sit in on a phone call where the president agrees to sell weapons to Ukraine, but he needs a favor first.

First he wants them to investigate the DNC's favorite Wallstreet whore for the democrat nomination.

What do you do?

1)Cover it up. Move the communications to a secure server than have people send texts describing the conversation as clearly not being a quid pro quo a few days later.

2)Stonewall congress.

3)Resign.

4)Tell the president he's a dumbass. If he's asked the president of Ukraine to investigate Cofer Black and any other sketchy American executives operating in Ukraine without mentioning Biden, and without a quid pro quo.....

The president of Ukraine would have wanted to do that, and Biden would have been ensnared automatically.

Without getting impeached.

That's not related nor what happened though, the least bit
.., try to stay on the same plot. And please stop being subjective . It's not a good look.

You were wrong about Russian Collusion and now your amnesia is going to get you into another embarrassment.


Nice try though.
I never opined on Russian collusion.

chuckle

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 518888
10-09-2019 06:36 PM

 




Post: #24
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Yeah. Trump sure puts on a show. Time to impeach to reality TV star who manipulates, lies, and confuses.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 444179
10-09-2019 06:59 PM

 




Post: #25
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:29 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:22 PM)
And you think YOU are calling them out by posting on a forum? You can debate all you want. Trump is getting impeached. The method does not matter. The right wing has perfected that idea.

I guess we shall see you next November....the very night that Trump wins again!
Bitcoin bet?
Just one, please!!
If you don't do it, then you have already admitted that Trump has won.

I dont remember replying to you. But I am REALLY scared of your avatar. That's what you're hoping for, right?
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 07:11 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #26
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:22 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 04:55 PM)
Correct, but someone has to call them out on their lies and deception. The Navy scenario is a perfect example how and where the Democrats have failed endlessly.

And you think YOU are calling them out by posting on a forum? You can debate all you want. Trump is getting impeached. The method does not matter. The right wing has perfected that idea.

If you're so certain. please register. You need to be held accountable for your assumptions.

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 07:14 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #27
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:34 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:31 PM)
Troubling isn't it! It's evident when you see it... Someone thinking they're educated while totally being clueless, its not education but indoctrination instead. They were taught what to think instead of how. Most are in student loan debt so deep...thinking they got their money's worth. In debt and indoctrinated. Believing they're smart. Believing. Knowing. Too blind to see, to deaf to hear, too dumb to understand... And in debt to become that way.

I don't have any student debt.

》Ellsberg and Manning is a good comparison.

Ok , explain

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 07:15 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #28
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:59 PM)
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:29 PM)
I guess we shall see you next November....the very night that Trump wins again!
Bitcoin bet?
Just one, please!!
If you don't do it, then you have already admitted that Trump has won.

I dont remember replying to you. But I am REALLY scared of your avatar. That's what you're hoping for, right?

Liberal female ^^^

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 07:16 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #29
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:35 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:06 PM)
That's not related nor what happened though, the least bit
.., try to stay on the same plot. And please stop being subjective . It's not a good look.

You were wrong about Russian Collusion and now your amnesia is going to get you into another embarrassment.


Nice try though.
I never opined on Russian collusion.

chuckle

Knfnpned

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 269062
10-09-2019 07:17 PM

Posts: 8,457




Post: #30
RE: Let's discuss and debunk this whistleblower charade
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2019 06:36 PM)
Yeah. Trump sure puts on a show. Time to impeach to reality TV star who manipulates, lies, and confuses.

Wow, you just presented a compelling evidence based argument. Wow

[ ]Not my fault you're thin skinned !!!!!!!!!!![/size]
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication