News
news New biometric database can identify people through scars, tattoos and even their voice
news Cattle Are Being Mutilated And Killed In Eastern Oregon
news Insider Interview on Skinwalker Ranch History
news Squirrels Can Speak Bird
news US Navy pilot says mystery ‘dark mass’ emerged from ocean and swallowed torpedo
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 8 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 268317
11-07-2019 10:11 PM

Posts: 9,103




Post: #16
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
Advertisement
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-07-2019 05:49 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (11-07-2019 12:35 PM)
You're in a for a rude awakening, it's a shame you're a pu$$y in anon mode. Anyways

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...ew-summary

Why would I be in for a “rude awakening”?

1. Unlike Trumpies...I don’t excuse criminal behavior or feel as though 100% of everyone that might agree with me politically is infallible, nor am I precluded from changing my conclusions when new evidence is presented as conservativism demands from its cult members. If FBI interviews truly were materially altered, then charges should be pressed against those who did so.

2. Flynn’s guilt or innocence while extremely important to Flynn (obviously) doesn’t change anything at all in the big picture of impeachment. Flynn isn’t a witness nor even worked in the administration at the time Trump has confessed to criminally extorting a foreign government and attempted bribery.

3. Your first “source” link was incoherent word soup trying to build a “conspiracy” based on the idea that a Brit has access to a publicly available newspaper article that all 7.3 billion people on earth could read for free on the internet for a month beforehand.

4. Your second link is at least coherently constructed...and in fairness does raise a couple of points that SHOULD be looked into. However, at the same time...it’s hardly any kind of big smoking gun, either. Missing in your Rohrschach test op-Ed article is any indication that the 302 being referenced for editing is actually FLYNN’s 302 as opposed to SOMEONE ELSE’S 302. In addition there is nothing per se to suggest that those “edits” contain anything more than the standard grammar, spelling, and punctuation correction that THE AUTHOR STATES ARE ROUTINE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE.

5. Regarding the single and sole discrepancy referenced between the 302’s and the investigator notes...for Flynn’s sake this SHOULD be looked into. However, while it IS WORTH looking into...we should ALSO not blindly assume that the claim is automatically true given that the “source” is an op-Ed piece on a conservative punditry blog and no actual notes are provided to the reader to review. There were two agents questioning Flynn...did they have conflicting notes? It’s common practice in a criminal investigation to ask the same question multiple times in multiple manners...did Flynn ONCE state he didn’t remember the 4 to 5 phone calls followed by three admissions that he DID?? You and I both don’t know because your “source” neither specifies nor think you are intelligent enough to review the notes yourself and form your own conclusion.

6. Comey’s bragging about the stupidity of the Trump admin and Flynn for talking to agents without counsel is irrelevant. The GOP wasn’t “victimized”...no one said the COULDN’T have a WH counsel present. That’s just the price of stupidity. Same thing happens to you if you are a suspect in a crime and you waive your right to counsel.

7. MOST IMPORTANTLY...Regardless of extremely vague text messages, allegations of 302 edits, or tales of discrepancies to investigator notes...THERE HAS STILL BEEN NO EXPLANATION as to WHY Flynn’s original legal counsel NEVER MENTIONED IT DURING DISCOVERY PRIOR TO PLEADING GUILTY UNDER OATH.

8. This idea that Flynn was coerced into a guilty plea is incoherent. Prior to entering any kind of plea, a defendants attorney has the right to review evidence and even motion for dismissal. If Flynn’s statements to investigators were materially and significantly altered to frame him...WHY WOULDN’T he motion to dismiss on those grounds at the onset?? Even if the motion was denied and he later plead guilty, he would have AT LEAST had the issue on record for appeal later??? This would be the kind of egregious legal fuckup in representation that one would expect out of an overworked inner city public defender on an armed robbery case...I have a hard time believing that a top flight defense attorney in a high profile case with potential consequences for national security and presidential impeachment would simply “forget” to verify the accuracy of the 302’s.

Now...that being said...however implausible I find the idea, I’m STILL willing to admit that those who agree with me politically are not infallible or divinely inspired and we should look into the matter to ensure we are not sending an innocent man to prison.

The question is...are YOU willing to admit that Flynn’s guilt or innocence is completely irrelevant at this point to the impeachable felonies Trump has confessed to on National TV and then committed again on National TV on the South Lawn of the White House for all to see?

Why dont you register so I can tell you why? Coward much?

[Image: O2J6TNG.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 519822
11-07-2019 10:48 PM

 




Post: #17
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears

Don’t be so thin skinned, Muffins.
Just think of me as your own personal logical fallacies whistleblower who will remain forever elusive and anonymous to you.

You can “tell me why” right here all you want.
It’s more amusing that way.
Quote this message in a reply
Яudis
The Contrarian
User ID: 321381
11-07-2019 11:17 PM

Posts: 12,965




Post: #18
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
Who Did the Europeans Fear Would Take Over The World In 1945!
[Image: FrDi7b1.jpg]

Who Do the Europeans Fear Today!
[Image: L8NQbZv.jpg]

Most of the ELECTION Interference, Internet SHILLING, Agent Provocateurs,
PAID Protesters, Are all Bought and Paid For By ClintonSoros and EU Countries!
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 523185
11-07-2019 11:21 PM

Posts: 9,103




Post: #19
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-07-2019 10:48 PM)

Don’t be so thin skinned, Muffins.
Just think of me as your own personal logical fallacies whistleblower who will remain forever elusive and anonymous to you.

You can “tell me why” right here all you want.
It’s more amusing that way.

Anon cant tell a member about being triggered or thin skinned, youre anon ya dolt.

For all I know you can be a sock. Again , register or admit your a fat pu$$y.

I'm cant even do a call out thread on your cowardly ass. Rofl

[Image: O2J6TNG.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
el Jefe
5★ Bandit
User ID: 421271
11-07-2019 11:28 PM

Posts: 1,420




Post: #20
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (11-07-2019 11:21 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-07-2019 10:48 PM)

Don’t be so thin skinned, Muffins.
Just think of me as your own personal logical fallacies whistleblower who will remain forever elusive and anonymous to you.

You can “tell me why” right here all you want.
It’s more amusing that way.

Anon cant tell a member about being triggered or thin skinned, youre anon ya dolt.

For all I know you can be a sock. Again , register or admit your a fat pu$$y.

I'm cant even do a call out thread on your cowardly ass. Rofl

chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
UnAcceptance
Registered User
User ID: 523331
11-07-2019 11:36 PM

Posts: 2,246




Post: #21
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (11-07-2019 11:21 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-07-2019 10:48 PM)

Don’t be so thin skinned, Muffins.
Just think of me as your own personal logical fallacies whistleblower who will remain forever elusive and anonymous to you.

You can “tell me why” right here all you want.
It’s more amusing that way.

Anon cant tell a member about being triggered or thin skinned, youre anon ya dolt.

For all I know you can be a sock. Again , register or admit your a fat pu$$y.

I'm cant even do a call out thread on your cowardly ass. Rofl

That was just another brave whistleblower, hiding in the shadows, because that'st what Champoins of Justice do.....
Now let's talk about that bridge I'm selling.Bump
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 412093
11-08-2019 12:16 AM

 




Post: #22
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
He is not a whistleblower. If he was, he would've testified under oath. He's a dnc operative, just like his lawyer, is a dnc operative, & just like the paid liar, who accused Kavanagh of misdeeds, was a dnc operative. Just like the MSM heads, who barry hussein politicized, are dnc operatives, & just like the 1% globalists, who own MSM, are dnc operatives. And, just like the Comeys, Clappers, & Brennans of the deep state, are dnc operatives. They are ALL guilty, of the crimes they are accusing the President of committing. Mass projecting & virtue signalling, by those who will be in the spotlight, when Barr & Durham, release their findings. If you think Trump will win by a landslide, just wait until Barr & Durham, release their reports. Popcorn
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 264282
11-08-2019 05:47 PM

Posts: 9,103




Post: #23
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (11-07-2019 11:36 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (11-07-2019 11:21 PM)
Anon cant tell a member about being triggered or thin skinned, youre anon ya dolt.

For all I know you can be a sock. Again , register or admit your a fat pu$$y.

I'm cant even do a call out thread on your cowardly ass. Rofl

That was just another brave whistleblower, hiding in the shadows, because that'st what Champoins of Justice do.....
Now let's talk about that bridge I'm selling.Bump

Yup chuckle

[Image: O2J6TNG.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
Eustace Muffins
Registered User
User ID: 264282
11-08-2019 05:48 PM

Posts: 9,103




Post: #24
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-08-2019 12:16 AM)
He is not a whistleblower. If he was, he would've testified under oath. He's a dnc operative, just like his lawyer, is a dnc operative, & just like the paid liar, who accused Kavanagh of misdeeds, was a dnc operative. Just like the MSM heads, who barry hussein politicized, are dnc operatives, & just like the 1% globalists, who own MSM, are dnc operatives. And, just like the Comeys, Clappers, & Brennans of the deep state, are dnc operatives. They are ALL guilty, of the crimes they are accusing the President of committing. Mass projecting & virtue signalling, by those who will be in the spotlight, when Barr & Durham, release their findings. If you think Trump will win by a landslide, just wait until Barr & Durham, release their reports. Popcorn

Thats^ a perfect definition what cuuck is... Bump chuckle

[Image: O2J6TNG.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
Strategos
Against Dystopia
User ID: 455233
11-08-2019 05:52 PM

Posts: 3,851




Post: #25
RE: CIA, FBI Informant Was Washington Post Source For Russiagate Smears
David Ignatius has long been my favorite reporter on the CIA payroll, ever since I found he was a paid CIA asset in 2004.

He is definitely deep state and his involvement should be investigated much, much more.

lewrockwell.com
whatreallyhappened.com
mises.org
thunderbolts.info
Quote this message in a reply








Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication