News
news New biometric database can identify people through scars, tattoos and even their voice
news Cattle Are Being Mutilated And Killed In Eastern Oregon
news Insider Interview on Skinwalker Ranch History
news Squirrels Can Speak Bird
news US Navy pilot says mystery ‘dark mass’ emerged from ocean and swallowed torpedo
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 409200
01-14-2020 07:20 PM

 




Post: #31
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
Advertisement
We FuXing 'Braniac' Gringo Americans, had better learn to consider, 'Alternative scenarios', that 'They', are going to use.
To, 'Pwn' our @$$tocks. Naughty

This guy uses 'baloons'.

Some people use, 'Our Democtatic Process'. Naughty






Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 529702
01-14-2020 07:29 PM

 




Post: #32
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
Allies warn Trump that ISIS is on the rise again. But it’s precisely because of America that Islamic State will never be defeated

Donald Trump once bragged about the total demolition of Islamic State. Today, thanks to his and previous presidents’ policies, IS is making a dangerous comeback. Now, even staunch American supporters are ringing alarm bells.

King Abdullah’s concern

In a stark warning, Jordan’s King Abdullah told French reporters that Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) is regrouping and is on the rise in the Middle East. The reason for this resurgence is simple: the manifestation of the political division that exists in Syria and Iraq brought on by the US-led effort to push back on Iranian influence in the region. This division has led to the collapse of the US military position in northeastern Syria brought on by last year’s military incursion by Turkey, and the recent cessation of US-led anti-IS operations in Iraq in the aftermath of the fallout from the US assassination of Qassem Soleimani, the Iranian military commander who orchestrated Iran’s anti-IS efforts in Iraq and Syria.

This is a far cry from February 2019, when President Trump announced that the US had defeated “100 percent” of the physical territory once held by Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/478227-trump-is...e-america/
Quote this message in a reply
ben
lop guest
User ID: 530988
01-14-2020 08:22 PM

 




Post: #33
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
Treebeard  Wrote: (11-14-2019 09:07 PM)
I would say roughly less than 10% of American
even have the mental acuity to grasp what he's saying.

Trully true when 50% can't show Iran on the map,
80% won't find Syria and the rest think Assad is a
type ass plug.

Just the dream team for the money printing All-American Inc. Corporation.
Quote this message in a reply
SkeptiSchism
Registered User
User ID: 450243
01-14-2020 08:57 PM

Posts: 14,059




Post: #34
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ®

[Image: mao%20face%20mask.png?itok=14v7DZOK]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 506014
01-14-2020 09:56 PM

 




Post: #35
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
Soy boy Assad should be thanking Trump from saving him from Obama's ISIS. They had him by the neck.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 514343
01-14-2020 10:00 PM

 




Post: #36
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
This is true.

Your income tax goes to the US corporation.

State and local taxes pay for schools, roads and services.
Quote this message in a reply
Treebeard
Registered User
User ID: 520205
01-14-2020 10:46 PM

Posts: 2,135




Post: #37
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
SkeptiSchism  Wrote: (01-14-2020 08:57 PM)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ®

Actually, the corporate name is "THE UNITED STATES".

"these United States of America" is the name of the former country.

notice "these" is not capitalised, and "America" is not in the corporate heading.

watch for the corporate (including corporate Democrats) reaction when the SAA plows into Idlib to rid it of terrorists... soon.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 531013
01-15-2020 12:25 AM

 




Post: #38
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
afraid  Wrote: (11-14-2019 09:06 PM)
About time someone tell the truth! Maybe he comes here and reads the threads on USA Company! chuckle Going back to the Crusades the Templar Knights were very fond of controlling Syria since trade zones are very important in that part of the Middle East.

American people are promoting war crimes and now face justice
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 442059
01-15-2020 12:38 AM

 




Post: #39
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
Butteh...

Aren't all our countries businesses?

Also Syria?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 437564
01-15-2020 12:51 AM

 




Post: #40
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
Treebeard  Wrote: (01-14-2020 10:46 PM)
SkeptiSchism  Wrote: (01-14-2020 08:57 PM)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ®

Actually, the corporate name is "THE UNITED STATES".

"these United States of America" is the name of the former country.

notice "these" is not capitalised, and "America" is not in the corporate heading.

watch for the corporate (including corporate Democrats) reaction when the SAA plows into Idlib to rid it of terrorists... soon.

Act of 1871
Quote this message in a reply
NormalIsSubjective

User ID: 525636
01-15-2020 01:25 AM

Posts: 10,344




Post: #41
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (01-14-2020 04:30 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-14-2020 09:47 AM)
the democratic party did all that sh*t to his country?

Muh Democrats!

the US army and allies were fighting ISIS you clueless dropkick.


Only after the sh*t hit the fan.


We finally know what Hillary Clinton knew all along – US allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding Isis

There is a bizarre discontinuity between what the Obama administration knew about the jihadis and what they would say in public
Patrick Cockburn, 14 October 2016


It is fortunate for Saudi Arabia and Qatar that the furore over the sexual antics of Donald Trump is preventing much attention being given to the latest batch of leaked emails to and from Hillary Clinton. Most fascinating of these is what reads like a US State Department memo, dated 17 August 2014, on the appropriate US response to the rapid advance of Isis forces, which were then sweeping through northern Iraq and eastern Syria.

At the time, the US government was not admitting that Saudi Arabia and its Sunni allies were supporting Isis and al-Qaeda-type movements. But in the leaked memo, which says that it draws on “western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region” there is no ambivalence about who is backing Isis, which at the time of writing was butchering and raping Yazidi villagers and slaughtering captured Iraqi and Syrian soldiers.

The memo says: “We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to Isis and other radical groups in the region.” This was evidently received wisdom in the upper ranks of the US government, but never openly admitted because to it was held that to antagonise Saudi Arabia, the Gulf monarchies, Turkey and Pakistan would fatally undermine US power in the Middle East and South Asia... https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/hil...62071.html


Obama’s “Anti-ISIS” Coalition Built ISIS, Biden Admits

by Alex Newman, 07 October 2014


Oops! Vice President Joe Biden did it again. Speaking at Harvard, Obama’s widely ridiculed vice president admitted what astute analysts have known all along: The Obama administration’s “coalition” partners in the supposed battle against the Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) played a key role in building up the threat from the start. Inadvertently, perhaps, Biden also stumbled upon another truth long accepted as fact among credible analysts: Despite all of Obama’s rhetoric, there is no such thing as a “moderate” force in Syria that the White House claims to have been supporting against Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

Of course, in his recent remarks, Biden omitted the giant White House role in arming and funding various jihadist forces currently rampaging and butchering their way through Iraq and Syria. So, the vice president’s comments were not quite telling the whole story. Still, in an administration infamous for deception, secrecy, paranoia, and outright lies, the partial truths spoken by Biden clearly struck a nerve — so much so that the VP is now begging Obama’s Islamic dictator “allies” in the region for forgiveness after letting the proverbial cat out of the bag... https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/fo...den-admits
Quote this message in a reply
NormalIsSubjective

User ID: 525636
01-15-2020 01:28 AM

Posts: 10,344




Post: #42
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-14-2020 09:56 PM)
Soy boy Assad should be thanking Trump from saving him from Obama's ISIS. They had him by the neck.


That was Russia, Iran and Hezbollah doing 90% of the work.


Trump is just there to steal the oil.
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2020 02:11 AM by NormalIsSubjective.) Quote this message in a reply
Treebeard
Registered User
User ID: 520205
01-15-2020 01:45 AM

Posts: 2,135




Post: #43
RE: Assad: US President does not work for the people but for a CORPORATION.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-15-2020 12:51 AM)
Treebeard  Wrote: (01-14-2020 10:46 PM)
Actually, the corporate name is "THE UNITED STATES".

"these United States of America" is the name of the former country.

notice "these" is not capitalised, and "America" is not in the corporate heading.

watch for the corporate (including corporate Democrats) reaction when the SAA plows into Idlib to rid it of terrorists... soon.

Act of 1871

It goes back to 1789, at the very least.

Residence Act, 1790, District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801, Virginia retrocession 1846, District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.

Passed the Senate on July 1, 1790 (14-12)
Passed the House of Representatives on July 9, 1790 (32-29)
Signed into law by President George Washington on July 16, 1790

Major amendments
Act to allow the capital to encompass areas to the south of the Eastern Branch, including Alexandria, Virginia (1791), ch. 17, 1 Stat. 214–215, Act to retrocede Alexandria County, D.C. to the State of Virginia (1846), ch. 35, 9 Stat. 35

"An Act to amend “An act for establishing the temporary and permanent seat of the Government of the United States.”
link below has text of the bill. Approved, March 3, 1791.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_St...Chapter_17

Look at the voting tally for the very first act to create a separate account of land, carved off the states of Maryland and Virginia, to form this CORPORATION... I'd call that a bill without a true mandate from the people, as early as 1790.
https://blogs.weta.org/boundarystones/20...ssion-1846

Working like the snake and Rothschild agent he was, Hamilton was heavily involved in finagling the deal.
"In a great compromise, the national capital was relocated south, to what is now Washington, D.C., in exchange for adopting Hamilton’s financial plan. The plan resulted in the federal government assuming $21.5 million in debts (the amounts of each states’ debt is listed on page 5), and payments were funded by new securities payable at a robust 6% interest."
https://www.sethkaller.com/item/1078-232...lan-(SOLD)

Passed the Senate on July 1, 1790 (14-12)
Passed the House of Representatives on July 9, 1790 (32-29)
Signed into law by President George Washington on July 16, 1790

This is why it took so long for some states to accept the Constitution. They knew it could be used to create a Federalized monster bearing much in common with the autocratic regimes of Europe. There was no innocent requirement or reason why Congress could not continue to be held in original state land, or land(s), as it was met in Philadelphia.

Everyone points to 1871, but the problems started in 1787, by 1790 they got what they wanted.
Do we live in a country whose original founding principles died in infancy ?
Did Washington allow fear of security (financial and military) to go against the spirit of '76 too eagerly?
The Anti-Federalists lost. Jefferson and Madison... caved on their ideals. Hamilton forced the 1790 Compromise, it was a loss to America, money was already corrupting us.. The Federalists were all aligned with Britian heavily, as the French Revolutionary Wars started, and the Anti-Federalists with the French.
-----------------------------------------
1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states: "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."
https://www.thesiriusreport.com/geopolit...d-dynasty/

From 1790 to 1800 Congress's spending skyrocketed, as did taxation and governmental borrowing. With statist Alexander Hamilton at the reigns of the Treasury Department, more government debt was accumulated for government expenditure programs, and the economy was in shambles as a result.
https://politicalvelcraft.org/2014/02/20...rth-korea/

[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2F99percentinvisible.org%...amp;nofb=1]

G. Washington: Mason, but anti-Illuminati
https://thenwwrdor.blogspot.com/2012/07/...ction.html

Washington's ancestors had almost 8,000 acres, going back 4 generations before George, and but my point was about the states rights. If one owns private property, it's private title does not override the fact it is located within a state. That's why Virginia objected
and eventually got their land back in 1846 (they were most upset about Alexandria), although Maryland did not. G. Washington was always a Federalist.
https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digi...st-papers/

Still, yes, it was 1871 that things really progressed. They needed to kill and maim 600,000 in the war between the states to make that happen. I don't think Washington would have done what Lincoln did. Hamilton? Oh yeah.
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2020 01:53 AM by Treebeard.) Quote this message in a reply








Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication