News
news 1950s Science Kit Had Real Uranium
news We're Probably Living in a Simulation, Elon Musk Says
news It’s Now Possible To Telepathically Communicate with a Drone Swarm
news New material to 'speed spacecraft to 134,000,000 mph'
news The future of food: what we’ll eat in 2028
news Descend Into England’s Network of Secret Nuclear Bunkers
news British UFO hunter’s laptop was ‘wiped’ after mysterious death
news Expert warns satellites could be hacked and used as giant 'radio frequency weapons'
news 1,000-year-old Maya document that tracks the movement of Venus is real
news Google Maps' strangest objects revealed
news The Russian Family That Cut Itself Off From Civilization for More Than 40 Years


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 13 Vote(s) - 2.23 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Fire of Prometheus
Registered User
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 12:49 PM

Posts: 253



Post: #46
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Advertisement
Bronco Bama  Wrote: (03-12-2018 07:41 AM)
The gun nuts claim that a determined enough shooter will obtain a gun no matter what, which is true, but by making them difficult to get, you definitely decrease the overall number of mass shooters. This is evident when you look at other developed nations that have since banned assault rifles, like Australia and the UK. The number of mass shootings from assault rifles per 1,000 people in AUS and the UK is tiny compared to the U.S.

The U.K. and Australia are islands.
The U.S. is not.
To make the U.S. gun free you have to make all of the Americas gun free.
If you make one piece of land gun free but it is surrounded by places with guns you get Chicago.
So step one to make America gun free the entire continent needs to be under one law.
We can invade Canada and Mexico to start doing that.
Then we can ban all guns and it can work.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 01:29 PM

 



Post: #47
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (03-12-2018 12:37 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-12-2018 12:20 PM)
That's why we need the 2nd. To keep people like you from doing whatever the heck you want, when you want to do it, to the detriment of those who would end up your victims.

That is interesting.. the victims I wish to see are people less terrorized by half a dozen mass shootings a year and they are the citizens in the US including yourself , sir

Anon

I propose no political solution or constitutional change.. the object of the discussion is to rationally find a viewpoint as to why banning assault weapons in some countries has prevented the number of mass shootings that are disproportionately and tragically obvious.

Where do most shootings occur?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un...000_people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Orleans,_Louisiana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee,_Wisconsin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington,_D.C.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_City,_Missouri
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cincinnati
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memphis,_Tennessee
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oakland,_California
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta

What do they have in common? Democrat Mayors.

Democrats who are overly fond of control freak regulations such as strong gun control and creating generational poverty with their welfare policies instead of fighting to keep jobs and businesses in the US. Much of it is gang on gang warfare over drug territory which effects poor minority groups the most. A lot of it is because of our open border policies that allow various gangs to recruit from other countries in order to supplant local gangs.

No one is throwing school walkouts over these people.

http://abc7chicago.com/news/trump-slams-...p/1732019/

Trump met with them and is trying to help through various churches and groups in the area but who keeps getting in the way? Three guesses. The local Democrats who just want a voting block and talking point.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 01:29 PM

 



Post: #48
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (03-12-2018 12:37 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-12-2018 12:20 PM)
That's why we need the 2nd. To keep people like you from doing whatever the heck you want, when you want to do it, to the detriment of those who would end up your victims.

That is interesting.. the victims I wish to see are people less terrorized by half a dozen mass shootings a year and they are the citizens in the US including yourself , sir

Anon

I propose no political solution or constitutional change.. the object of the discussion is to rationally find a viewpoint as to why banning assault weapons in some countries has prevented the number of mass shootings that are disproportionately and tragically obvious.

You can't really use the UK as evidence for mass shootings as there has only been three. There was one mass shooting with an assault rifle and that resulted in an assault rifle ban. There was one mass shooting with a handgun and that resulted in a handgun ban. There one mass shooting where a minicab driver drove around shooting people with a shotgun and that resulted in an Uber ban.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 01:33 PM

 



Post: #49
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Its actually easier to build anti personnel BOMB!
Than it is to buy a GUN of any kind!

In fact you can get the instructions to
build one right off the internet!

Some GUN Powder and Nails can do much
more damage than any gun!

And those are the simple facts!
And SUCH a BOMB is Illegal as all hell!
These Devises are MAJOR BAN Items!
Quote this message in a reply
OhZone
Registered User
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 03:36 PM

Posts: 74



Post: #50
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
In case you havn't been able to figure it out -- all these mass shootings are staged/false flags.
It is possible that no one died at Parkland.

When seconds count and may mean the difference between life and death the emergency workers were not allowed into the building.
Where were the Medi-Vac helicopters? Where were the ambulances?
How did the wounded get to the hospital?



Do not drink too deeply of the fount of knowledge lest you learn something you do not wish to know.

It is very easy to deceive a man and very difficult to undeceive him.

I never cease to be amazed at the ability of some people to override reason and negate logic.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 03:39 PM

 



Post: #51
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Just like banning drugs decreased overdose deaths, right?

Dumbass.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 03:46 PM

 



Post: #52
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Logros  Wrote: (03-12-2018 12:07 PM)
LOP Secret Agent  Wrote: (03-12-2018 12:00 PM)
There are no mass shootings in Japan because it's impossible to buy guns of any kind. There are only mass stabbings. Jhikpghf

Yea, and mass sarin gass attacks, or trucks.

But generally speaking the Japanese have a pretty low rate of crime.

The Yakuza keeps a tight lid on any criminal element. Thr Japanese people are socialized from a young age to behave. If Japan had the immigration the West has had their crime rate would shoot through the moon.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 03:48 PM

 



Post: #53
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (03-12-2018 09:46 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-12-2018 08:00 AM)
Bronco is prolly the only idiot on LOP that believes all these shootings were legit !

How does that statement support or oppose the idea that less assault weapons in society in the hands of the general public make mass killings with these weapons less likely?

What real point is there to continuing to try and argue every fkn position with retarded fallacy?

you do the opposing argument no favors by using bandwagon appeals to bias and attacking the OP's proposition with tu quoque and ad hom.


what you basically say when you do this is :
I have got nothing.
but you are wrong.

Nobody died at Sandy Hook...426 pages of evidence:

https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Nobody...dyHook.pdf
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 03:54 PM

 



Post: #54
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-12-2018 03:48 PM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (03-12-2018 09:46 AM)
How does that statement support or oppose the idea that less assault weapons in society in the hands of the general public make mass killings with these weapons less likely?

What real point is there to continuing to try and argue every fkn position with retarded fallacy?

you do the opposing argument no favors by using bandwagon appeals to bias and attacking the OP's proposition with tu quoque and ad hom.


what you basically say when you do this is :
I have got nothing.
but you are wrong.

Nobody died at Sandy Hook...426 pages of evidence:

https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Nobody...dyHook.pdf

Yes, hard evidence that the US government has a nefarious agenda to disarm Americans.









Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 03:58 PM

 



Post: #55
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-12-2018 03:48 PM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (03-12-2018 09:46 AM)
How does that statement support or oppose the idea that less assault weapons in society in the hands of the general public make mass killings with these weapons less likely?

What real point is there to continuing to try and argue every fkn position with retarded fallacy?

you do the opposing argument no favors by using bandwagon appeals to bias and attacking the OP's proposition with tu quoque and ad hom.


what you basically say when you do this is :
I have got nothing.
but you are wrong.

Nobody died at Sandy Hook...426 pages of evidence:

https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Nobody...dyHook.pdf

Parkland shooter was not Cruz, was wearing full tactical gear.


Quote this message in a reply
Mayor McCheese
Registered User
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 05:00 PM

Posts: 144



Post: #56
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Bronco Bama  Wrote: (03-12-2018 07:41 AM)
The gun nuts claim that a determined enough shooter will obtain a gun no matter what, which is true, but by making them difficult to get, you definitely decrease the overall number of mass shooters. This is evident when you look at other developed nations that have since banned assault rifles, like Australia and the UK. The number of mass shootings from assault rifles per 1,000 people in AUS and the UK is tiny compared to the U.S.

But some of these 'mass shooters' are given the guns to shoot by nefarious types. Remember, there are some pretty sketchy details that 'official stories' don't relay in the media about the San Bernardino and Las Vegas shooters, actually just about every mass casualty incident since I can remember has had some extremely sketchy ignored details. Just don't believe a word from CNN, NBC, CBC, CTV, CBS, ABC, FOX actually the list goes on.
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2018 05:01 PM by Mayor McCheese.) Quote this message in a reply
PioneerSpirit
Registered User
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 05:47 PM

Posts: 8,601



Post: #57
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Quote:Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings

Assault rifles are ALREADY banned.

You do realize that the AR in AR15 isn't for 'assault rifle' right?
It has to do with the name of the company that developed the rifle.

The AR 15 shoots just as many bullets as a 9 mil handgun and just as fast.
No rapid fire machine gun style. It's not an assault rifle.

I really wish the anti-gun crowd knew what the hell they were talking about
when they want to jump in the gun discussions ... seriously. chuckle

"They notice that you notice" - Mothman Prophecies doomed

A tradition cannot make an historical claim and then refuse to have it evaluated by history
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2018 05:50 PM by PioneerSpirit.) Quote this message in a reply
PioneerSpirit
Registered User
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 05:50 PM

Posts: 8,601



Post: #58
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Bronco Bama  Wrote: (03-12-2018 07:41 AM)
... like Australia and the UK.

Hey dude ... you don't understand geo-politics or demographics. The UK and Australia are island nations WITHOUT the same demographic problems we have in the USA. they don't have wide open borders with tens of millions of uneducated illegals screaming in. And they don't have cities full of anti-white black and hispanic populations living off government handouts. You can't compare the USA with either of those places. Whole different demographic.

"They notice that you notice" - Mothman Prophecies doomed

A tradition cannot make an historical claim and then refuse to have it evaluated by history
Quote this message in a reply
Damrod
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 05:51 PM

 



Post: #59
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Jptdknpa

Yeah-yeah...sure-sure...

and if a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass on the ground when he jumped.

Those intent on carnage will just do something else...

I never met a criminal or crazy person that really cared what laws were made...they are going to do whatever they want anyway.

and btw dipshit...as long as they are still made...anywhere in the world...they WILL be available on the black market. Still just as easy to obtain.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
03-12-2018 06:02 PM

 



Post: #60
RE: Banning Assault Rifles Will Decrease Mass Shootings
Banning Nazi propaganda, terrorism, lies, theft, murders has the same effect
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication