|
Thread Rating:
- 6 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
|
Treebeard Registered User User ID: 562367 01-13-2021 11:03 PM
Posts: 3,765
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
They took their oaths
against all enemies
foreign and domestic.

|
|
|
|
Fhate lop guest User ID: 571299 01-13-2021 11:10 PM
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
The Pic reminds me of that other Commie with his feet up all over the furniture.
|
|
|
|
Whatsamatta_U Registered User User ID: 546340 01-16-2021 04:33 AM
Posts: 5,131
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
Pentagon probes extremism in U.S. military as thousands of troops guard D.C. after Capitol riot
-- More than a dozen Democratic senators called on the Defense Department to launch an investigation into the prevalence of White supremacy in the military.
-- The probe comes as thousands of National Guard service members protect Washington, D.C., in the wake of the deadly break-in at the U.S. Capitol by President Donald Trump's supporters.
-- A U.S. Army officer involved in psychological operations, Capt. Emily Rainey, resigned Monday after commanders at Fort Bragg confirmed that they were reviewing her involvement in the riot.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.co...-riot.html
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 563940 01-16-2021 04:54 AM
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
You guys realize its now generally known( away from propaganda outlets) that blm and antifa breached Capitol , a cnn presenter ,colluded with a blm member about tactics to break in as a Trump supporter,another cnn presenter got caught with an antifa/blm doing similar stuff. Both events caught on video.
Lop ain't what it used to be.
So the impeachment is falsely made and all those blaming tump think they are jumping on the winning side,anything to save their skins.
Even the fbi say there is evidence of pre planed attack[/quote]s,not a rousing speech by Pres Trump
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 568273 01-16-2021 05:01 AM
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
Whatsamatta_U Wrote: (01-13-2021 04:51 AM)
Military Joint Chiefs statement condemning
'sedition and insurrection' at US Capitol
link to image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...r_1994.jpg
(CNN) -- America's most senior general Mark Milley and the entire Joint Chiefs of
Staff, which is comprised of the heads of each military branch, issued a statement
Tuesday condemning the violent invasion of the US Capitol last week and
reminding service members of their obligation to support and defend the
Constitution and reject extremism.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/12/politics/...index.html
Why in the f*#k are they all so weird looking?
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 563940 01-16-2021 05:09 AM
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 563940 01-16-2021 05:12 AM
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
|
|
|
|
Whatsamatta_U Registered User User ID: 546340 01-16-2021 05:16 AM
Posts: 5,131
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
Well that settles it then
It's all John Sullivan's doing
I'm convinced
|
|
|
|
Whatsamatta_U Registered User User ID: 567738 Yesterday 11:09 PM
Posts: 5,131
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
FBI vetting Guard troops in DC
amid fears of insider attack
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. defense officials say they are worried about an insider
attack or other threat from service members involved in securing President-elect Joe
Biden’s inauguration, prompting the FBI to vet all of the 25,000 National Guard
troops coming into Washington for the event.
The massive undertaking reflects the extraordinary security concerns that have
gripped Washington following the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol by
pro-Trump rioters. And it underscores fears that some of the very people assigned to
protect the city over the next several days could present a threat to the incoming
president and other VIPs in attendance.
Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy told The Associated Press on Sunday that officials are
conscious of the potential threat, and he warned commanders to be on the lookout
for any problems within their ranks as the inauguration approaches. So far, however,
he and other leaders say they have seen no evidence of any threats, and officials
said the vetting hadn’t flagged any issues that they were aware of.
https://apnews.com/article/biden-inaugur...fed1242ae8
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 574764 Yesterday 11:16 PM
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
Russian FBI
|
|
|
|
NormalIsSubjective
 User ID: 573345 Yesterday 11:55 PM
Posts: 16,545
|
RE: Joint Chiefs Message: Riot, Insurrection, and Inauguration
LoP Guest Wrote: (01-13-2021 04:33 AM)fire every one of those people who signed this
In their defense, they did inadvertently pull back the curtain a little bit.
The Pentagon Speaks
by Jacob G. Hornberger, January 13, 2021
The Joint Chiefs of Staff have spoken. Issuing a remarkable memorandum to all members of the Armed Forces, the JCS have declared that Joe Biden will be the new president of the United States. The memo may have been not only one to military personnel but also to President Trump: No matter how convinced you are that the election was stolen from you, don’t even think about remaining in power because we will ensure your forcible exit from the White House.
Unfortunately, relatively few people, including libertarians, comprehend that the Pentagon, along with the CIA and the NSA and, to a certain extent, the FBI, are the part of the federal government in which ultimate power is being wielded. They are the ones who are ruling the roost in America. That’s why that memo is so important. It’s declaring how things will be.
This overwhelming power is usually exercised behind the scenes in order to make Americans feel comfortable that their government is different from other national-security governments. While the national-security branch of the government is driving the overall direction America will take, especially with respect to foreign affairs, it permits the other three branches to maintain the appearance of power. The idea is to convince Americans that the federal government operates the same as a national-security state as it did when it was a limited-government republic.
But it’s a lie, a very dangerous lie, one that unfortunately is lived by all too many Americans, especially those within the mainstream press.
If you haven’t read the book National Security and Double Government by Michael J. Glennon, you owe it to yourself to do so so. This is Glennon’s thesis — that the national-security establishment is the part of the federal government that is wielding and exercising the ultimate power within the governmental structure. At the same time, however, it permits the legislative, judicial, and executive parts of the government to continue appearing to be in charge.
[...]
Consider, for example, the many laments against America’s “forever wars.” It’s a popular mantra, including among libertarians. But what good does it do to complain about “forever wars” if the root cause of such wars is left in place, where it is in charge?
In other words, the national-security establishment needs those forever wars, just as it needed the Cold War. Any national-security state necessarily depends of fear, crises, chaos, and emergencies — or “threats” of such things to sustain its existence, its power, and its money. They will always find something for people to be afraid of, even if they have to instigate it. Communism, terrorism, drug dealers, illegal immigrants, Muslims, Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Iran, Syria, insurrectionists, revolutionaries, invaders, or whatever. Without such fearful things, people are apt to ask why they need a national-security state instead of a limited-government republic, which was the type of governmental structure on which America was founded.
What is the distinguishing characteristic of a national-security state, as compared to a limited-government republic? Power — raw, unadulterated power. With its vast military and arsenal of weaponry, along with extreme powers of assassination and surveillance, a national-security establishment has the means of imposing its will on government and on society. No one wields the countervailing power to resist... https://www.fff.org/2021/01/13/the-pentagon-speaks/
|
|
|
|
|