News
news China's Chilling 'Social Credit System' Is Straight Out of Dystopian Sci-Fi
news UFO 'death ray' made Korean War GIs sick
news The Haunted States of America
news When the Supernatural Feeds on Us
news Russian space agency says space station hole was deliberate sabotage
news Biblical end of days prophecy COMES TRUE as fish swim again in Dead Sea
news 1950s Science Kit Had Real Uranium
news We're Probably Living in a Simulation, Elon Musk Says
news It’s Now Possible To Telepathically Communicate with a Drone Swarm
news New material to 'speed spacecraft to 134,000,000 mph'
news The future of food: what we’ll eat in 2028


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 65 Vote(s) - 2.05 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
UnAcceptance
Registered User
User ID: 467764
Today 08:51 PM

Posts: 989



Post: #17776
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
Advertisement
VM  Wrote: (Today 08:45 PM)
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (Today 08:41 PM)
Can't you flat erfers even agree on your strongest proof?
It sems there is unrest in the ranks. Tissue

JibbyJedi just answered your question, are you F'd in the brain !!!!

Gave ya one question to answer. Congratulations, you have failed.
You could have picked your strongest proof.
You bounced....even on your own belief thread.
You could have used MAGIC, but lacked the foresight of being able to answer a question.
Puttin' this one in my "keep books" area.
(This post was last modified: Today 08:53 PM by UnAcceptance.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 430030
Today 08:54 PM

 



Post: #17777
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
dig  Wrote: (Today 08:50 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 08:47 PM)
No one sees or experiences the molecules of air either, does that count?

link to image: https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/kanc...1110112924

LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 07:05 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 09:15 PM)
Seen and witnesed are a senses related to the eye, this does not confirm its existence in physicality.

Photography is also seen, this does not confirm its existence in physicality, but a developed picture (photograph) in your hand does confirm that it is a image of something seen, even if the image is of someone touching something.

Touched is a sense that confirms its physicality that it actually has physical existence.

Physical evidence is different from circumstantial eye witness, dont you agree?
Quote this message in a reply
JibbyJedi
-In Exile-
User ID: 466109
Today 08:57 PM

Posts: 120



Post: #17778
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 08:47 PM)
JibbyJedi  Wrote: (Today 08:38 PM)
No, lol.

If molecules were solo large objects then bendy may exist in that nature.

No one sees or experiences bendy water at rest, no one needs to prove the observable reality... the non observable reality of water claimed by the globe proponents are what need proving conclusively.

No one sees or experiences the molecules of air either, does that count?

OMG lol...... do you inhale and exhale? Do u ever hear sounds outside? Ever see wavy air above a hot paved road?

Any adults with working brains around?

"Who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool who follows him?"
- Gandalf, Stardate 879.43B
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 430030
Today 08:59 PM

 



Post: #17779
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
JibbyJedi  Wrote: (Today 08:57 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 08:47 PM)
No one sees or experiences the molecules of air either, does that count?

OMG lol...... do you inhale and exhale? Do u ever hear sounds outside? Ever see wavy air above a hot paved road?

Any adults with working brains around?

LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 07:05 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 09:15 PM)
Seen and witnesed are a senses related to the eye, this does not confirm its existence in physicality.

Photography is also seen, this does not confirm its existence in physicality, but a developed picture (photograph) in your hand does confirm that it is a image of something seen, even if the image is of someone touching something.

Touched is a sense that confirms its physicality that it actually has physical existence.

Physical evidence is different from circumstantial eye witness, dont you agree?

Physical evidence requires a human interaction with the senses, not just eye circumstantial witness.

Do you disagree?
Quote this message in a reply
dig
Registered User
User ID: 410064
Today 08:59 PM

Posts: 2,559



Post: #17780
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (Today 08:51 PM)
VM  Wrote: (Today 08:45 PM)
JibbyJedi just answered your question, are you F'd in the brain !!!!

Gave ya one question to answer. Congratulations, you have failed.
You could have picked your strongest proof.
You bounced....even on your own belief thread.
You could have used MAGIC, but lacked the foresight of being able to answer a question.
Puttin' this one in my "keep books" area.
How is water at rest always finding it's level a belief?
Like Jibby said , that's an objective truth.
You 'beleivers' use the magic of grabbity to make balls full of water spin against vacuums without solid barriers ya fooking numpty.

You want to prove this so called fact by giving a practical example in reality?
(This post was last modified: Today 09:06 PM by dig.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 467764
Today 09:15 PM

 



Post: #17781
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
dig  Wrote: (Today 08:59 PM)
UnAcceptance  Wrote: (Today 08:51 PM)
Gave ya one question to answer. Congratulations, you have failed.
You could have picked your strongest proof.
You bounced....even on your own belief thread.
You could have used MAGIC, but lacked the foresight of being able to answer a question.
Puttin' this one in my "keep books" area.
How is water at rest always finding it's level a belief?
Like Jibby said , that's an objective truth.
You 'beleivers' use the magic of grabbity to make balls full of water spin against vacuums without solid barriers ya fooking numpty.

You want to prove this so called fact by giving a practical example in reality?

You pose a question instead of answering. Flat erf handbook 101.
Such a laughable belief thread.
Not one proof.
Have a great Monday!
Quote this message in a reply
grav
Registered User
User ID: 356688
Today 09:54 PM

Posts: 2,209



Post: #17782
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
UnAcceptance. Hmm, kind of a Freudian inferiority complex there, eh? Someone has issues, and how about that grim reaper avatar? Why that gloomy perspective?
He asks for proof. And what page is this, and what year? 2015? Like we have not been over this 100s of times already.

Will a logical syllogism do?

Water seeks its own level, referring to a straight and horizontal line.
Oceans are water.
Oceans are level.

Shills are a necessary evil. We can't ignore them completely, but we can't let them derail the thread with bs and repetitive questions. This thread is dedicated to the advancement of knowledge, not as kindergarten level FE. But I still can't find information about the moon's radiation.
[Image: yTUFf.png]

The image shows a spectrum from ultraviolet to visible light to infrared.
Now let's compare that to the moon. Type in 'lunar radiation spectrum' and . . .

results: nil.

So what do we know about moonlight? It's colder than nightshade. People used to think it was unhealthy to be out when the moon was shining. And of course, vampires and werewolves.

• 37 Experiments Proving FE: https://youtu.be/OoxhDtnRmBk
• 200 Proofs Earth Is Not a Spinning Ball, http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/...-ball.html
• GE do-it-yourself math --> 8xd^; FE = |___180°___|
Quote this message in a reply
earth friend
lop guest
User ID: 467086
Today 10:05 PM

 



Post: #17783
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 08:59 PM)
JibbyJedi  Wrote: (Today 08:57 PM)
OMG lol...... do you inhale and exhale? Do u ever hear sounds outside? Ever see wavy air above a hot paved road?

Any adults with working brains around?

LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 07:05 PM)
Physical evidence is different from circumstantial eye witness, dont you agree?

Physical evidence requires a human interaction with the senses, not just eye circumstantial witness.

Do you disagree?

They can not disagree, that is the level foundation of their argument that seeing is a type of physical evidence, when they know that it is not, it is purely circumstantial.

Then they try to use fake circumstantial evidence ('prove spinning water ball in vacuum") as evidence, that for that fact the earth is flat.

But maybe i am wrong lets see how they answer this considerate question that you have asked without bias or insult.

Popcorn
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 467086
Today 10:08 PM

 



Post: #17784
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 08:54 PM)
dig  Wrote: (Today 08:50 PM)
link to image: https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/kanc...1110112924

LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 07:05 PM)
Physical evidence is different from circumstantial eye witness, dont you agree?
Quote this message in a reply
dig
Registered User
User ID: 410064
Today 10:12 PM

Posts: 2,559



Post: #17785
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
LoP Guest  Wrote: (Today 09:15 PM)
dig  Wrote: (Today 08:59 PM)
How is water at rest always finding it's level a belief?
Like Jibby said , that's an objective truth.
You 'beleivers' use the magic of grabbity to make balls full of water spin against vacuums without solid barriers ya fooking numpty.

You want to prove this so called fact by giving a practical example in reality?

You pose a question instead of answering. Flat erf handbook 101.
Such a laughable belief thread.
Not one proof.
Have a great Monday!

So you have no idea that the proof provided proved that your reality is fake, that you are living in a fake reality and then provide no proof to the contrary?

Totally indoctrinated cattle reply 101.

Have a great rest of your dumb life.
(This post was last modified: Today 10:14 PM by dig.) Quote this message in a reply
UnAcceptance
Registered User
User ID: 467764
Today 10:14 PM

Posts: 989



Post: #17786
RE: Dedicated Flat Earth Thread
grav  Wrote: (Today 09:54 PM)
UnAcceptance. Hmm, kind of a Freudian inferiority complex there, eh? Someone has issues, and how about that grim reaper avatar? Why that gloomy perspective?
He asks for proof. And what page is this, and what year? 2015? Like we have not been over this 100s of times already.

Will a logical syllogism do?

Water seeks its own level, referring to a straight and horizontal line.
Oceans are water.
Oceans are level.

Shills are a necessary evil. We can't ignore them completely, but we can't let them derail the thread with bs and repetitive questions. This thread is dedicated to the advancement of knowledge, not as kindergarten level FE. But I still can't find information about the moon's radiation.
[Image: yTUFf.png]

The image shows a spectrum from ultraviolet to visible light to infrared.
Now let's compare that to the moon. Type in 'lunar radiation spectrum' and . . .

results: nil.

So what do we know about moonlight? It's colder than nightshade. People used to think it was unhealthy to be out when the moon was shining. And of course, vampires and werewolves.

So this is your strongest proof, outstanding!
You respond with no response.
Do you have even a PROOF?
Just one proof. I'm sure if you go to http://www.flatearthsociety.com that you can come with one proof that will shut this whole belief down.
Quote this message in a reply








Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication