10 Reasons to question the world as a spinning ball in space vacuum.
1. Curvature. Spherical trigonometry dictates that the globe should exhibit a curve of 8 inches per mile squared. No experiments on land or water have ever proven this math to be accurate. On the contrary, with proper telephoto lenses, objects can be detected far beyond the expected curvature. Example: Photos of Chicago from across Lake Michigan.
2. Atmosphere vs space vacuum. Space theoretically begins 62 miles above the earth’s surface, at the Karman Line. The laws of physics say that a vacuum can not exist next to an atmosphere. Without a barrier to separate the two areas, the atmosphere would instantly escape into the hard vacuum of space. Example: open a tank of compressed air; the oxygen or other gases inside the tank will rush outside to achieve equilibrium of air pressure. A vacuum cannot exist next to the atmosphere.
3. Water. Liquid water always seeks its own level. Gravity, which is really the function of density (weight) of objects over distances, cannot cause oceans to curve around the globe. Sea level must be consistent throughout the world. Water, in other words, can not curve. Example: the Pacific Ocean, sea level.
4. Centrifugal force. If earth rotated at 1000 mph at the equator, nothing could withstand being thrown off of it along a curved or tangential path. Gravity is said to be the weakest force in the universe. It is, under any circumstances, unable to overcome the extreme speed of rotation. Gravity is actually the ratio of densities of adjacent objects, such as the density of water compared to that of air.. Examples include insects, clouds, smoke, other low density-objects which rise above the earth despite the alleged gravity and centrifugal force. Example: merry-go-rounds.
5. Authorities. Professionals in many fields --pilots, engineers, surveyors, gunners, artillerymen, radar operators, etc. -- do not account for curvature in any manner. Example: surveyors never adjust for earth curvature when they design canals, causeway bridges, railroad lines.
6 Moon and sun. Both objects appear to the eye to be the same size, though the moon is around 238,000 miles away and the sun is 93 million miles distant. Sunlight beams deny the claim that rays enter earth’s atmosphere in parallel beams. Using simple geometry, one can determine that the triangular pattern results in a distance of only 3000 miles above. The moon emits a cooling light which illuminates only the clouds which are near it, not those that are further away. Example: sunlight beaming rays through clouds (crepuscular rays) form a triangle with a base of less than 8,000 miles miles
7. Constellations. Star patterns have not altered appreciably in human history. Considering speeds of celestial objects which travel billions of miles per year in multiple directions, as well as earth’s own rotation, revolution around the sun, following the sun through the universe, we should observe some changes in as little as 6 months (stellar parallax). But no such changes have been seen in 6000 years. Example: Orion, Polaris in the same locations for millennia.
8. Airplane travel. Flights to and from countries in the southern hemisphere always pass over countries in the north, even though they could refuel in places along a direct route. When plotted on the flat earth map, the planes show that they follow a straight line. Example: flights between South America, Africa, Australia..
9. No Sensation of movement. If earth actually rotated and revolved around the sun at 67,000 mph, we should hear sonic booms and be swept away by winds far beyond hurricane strength. Examples: quiet, calm days, east-to-west winds
10. Photographs of earth from space. There are no legitimate pictures or videos of earth. All pictorial evidence is computer-generated, as are almost all photos of celestial objects. NASA even says that these photographs were created to “match people’s expectations.”
Other evidence includes fakery from space agencies, including the ISS and the Space Shuttle, further supports the argument that our ideas about space are entirely faked.
We're back, kids. And we have a clean slate to draw on.
And we already have a new video, thanks to Rothbard.
And my reaction to it, pasted from COP:
Two points struck me in that video, RB.
- It says that 186 miles is the highest altitude a rocket has reached without blowing up. Space begins around 62 miles, the Karman line, where atmospheric gases are virtually nil. Is that anything we can confirm? I'd like to find a video that collects all the verifiable footage of rockets that ascend as high as possible.
- It states that the globe hides the existence of the Creator. I don't get that at all. Even my hard shell Baptist friends believe in the Copernican model. Well, at least the basic belief in the spinning ball, a creation of God.
Besides, by injecting religion into FE theory, we lose a significant portion of critical thinkers who then lump us in with Luddites who reject science. Imo, all FE discussion should explore facts, and just the facts. Like the ultimate range of rockets.
Getting the facts is our job. A damned hard job it is too. Tptb hide everything in plain sight. On a plane site. So dig we must.
"A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring"
~ Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism (1711)
Illegitimi non carborundum, platygaeanae!
GE = 8xd^; FE = |___180°___|
If the earth is flat, wouldnt the seasons be constant based on where you are?
Explain the change of seasons.
Mainstream science says the 66.6° (or 23.4°) tilt causes seasons. That means that one location will see a few hundred miles of change with a corresponding difference of more or less light.
We are enjoying warm long days now, since earth is 3 million miles closer to the sun in January than we are in July. Right?
Does that make sense?
"A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring"
~ Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism (1711)
Illegitimi non carborundum, platygaeanae!
GE = 8xd^; FE = |___180°___|
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2018 06:32 PM by grav.)
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 436595 01-02-2018 06:42 PM
If the earth is flat, wouldnt the seasons be constant based on where you are?
Explain the change of seasons.
Mainstream science says the 66.6° (or 23.4°) tilt causes seasons. That means that one location will see a few hundred miles of change with a corresponding difference of more or less light.
You've never bothered to learn anything from the many people who honestly tried to help you understand the seasons.
The only conclusions we have are that you intentionally misrepresent or you are incapable of learning.
Which is it grav?
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 439646 01-02-2018 06:49 PM
If the earth is flat, wouldnt the seasons be constant based on where you are?
Explain the change of seasons.
Mainstream science says the 66.6° (or 23.4°) tilt causes seasons. That means that one location will see a few hundred miles of change with a corresponding difference of more or less light.
We are enjoying warm long days now, since earth is 3 million miles closer to the sun in January than we are in July. Right?
Does that make sense?
Ive always thought that it is not the distance, but the tilt of the northern hemisphere in the summer toward the sun that caused it to be hotter. We are farther away but tilted toward the sun. Australia is tilted toward the sun in January, so they have super hot summer because they are closer and tilted toward the sun at the same time.
Where I live, it is currently -9 F this morning, but we hit the 90's on the summer. If Im sitting on a disc that doesnt move, why do I get such temperature fluctuations?
Im not asking to disprove your theory, I just want to understand how this can be explained in a FE model.
Remember, I am playing a character who is based on me.
Mainstream science says the 66.6° (or 23.4°) tilt causes seasons. That means that one location will see a few hundred miles of change with a corresponding difference of more or less light.
We are enjoying warm long days now, since earth is 3 million miles closer to the sun in January than we are in July. Right?
Does that make sense?
Ive always thought that it is not the distance, but the tilt of the northern hemisphere in the summer toward the sun that caused it to be hotter. We are farther away but tilted toward the sun. Australia is tilted toward the sun in January, so they have super hot summer because they are closer and tilted toward the sun at the same time.
Where I live, it is currently -9 F this morning, but we hit the 90's on the summer. If Im sitting on a disc that doesnt move, why do I get such temperature fluctuations?
Im not asking to disprove your theory, I just want to understand how this can be explained in a FE model.
Maybe because the "sun" is smaller and closer to us then what we've been told?
Mainstream science says the 66.6° (or 23.4°) tilt causes seasons. That means that one location will see a few hundred miles of change with a corresponding difference of more or less light.
We are enjoying warm long days now, since earth is 3 million miles closer to the sun in January than we are in July. Right?
Does that make sense?
Ive always thought that it is not the distance, but the tilt of the northern hemisphere in the summer toward the sun that caused it to be hotter. We are farther away but tilted toward the sun. Australia is tilted toward the sun in January, so they have super hot summer because they are closer and tilted toward the sun at the same time.
Where I live, it is currently -9 F this morning, but we hit the 90's on the summer. If Im sitting on a disc that doesnt move, why do I get such temperature fluctuations?
Im not asking to disprove your theory, I just want to understand how this can be explained in a FE model.
Please don't think we have answers. We have theories, just like "real" science does.
Here is one, more concave than flat earth, but I like how the graphics are drawn.
The light source we call the sun is around 3000 miles above the surface. It circles above us between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn through the year. It also ascends and descends in altitude in a spiral. Though it rises in the east, that direction does not apply to the way we are taught with latitude and longitude lines. The only thing I can compare it to is a rainbow, which changes its position according to the perspective of the observer.
Now a bigger question is this: what the heck is the sun? A giant burning ball of gas? A nuclear furnace? It's mostly helium and hydrogen, in theory. So how do lighter than air gases become so heavy that planets whirl around them?
"A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring"
~ Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism (1711)
Illegitimi non carborundum, platygaeanae!
GE = 8xd^; FE = |___180°___|
Lunaticoutpost.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program , an
affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to
earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
Amazon, the Amazon logo, MYHABIT, and the MYHABIT logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Terms of Service :
Don't be a pest to the forum.
No profanity in thread-titles or usernames
No excessive profanity in posts
No Racism, Antisemitism + Hate
No calls for violence against anyone..
Disclaimer:
This website exists for fun and discussion only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites,
are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way
representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this
website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific
author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual
information on behalf of the owner or administration of
LunaticOutPost.Com. The owners or administration of this website can't
be hold responsible for content hosted on sites that posters link to
in; including, but not limited to, posts, signatures, private messages and such.
This site may contain content not suitable for minors and if you feel
you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use
of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance
awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science
& technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material. The
material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes.
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users
limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant
portions of the article you wish to discuss (no more than 50% of the
source material) provide a link back to the original article and provide
your original comments / criticism in your post with the article. If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and
you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair
Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright please contact [email protected]
Privacy Policy:
This website is owned by :
Marco Zwaneveld
Drijfriemstraat 52
2516 XR The Hague
Netherlands.
I will not rent, sell, share or otherwise disclose your personal information to any third party.
We might contact you from time to time
regarding your purchases or the services (like forums and announcement
lists) you have subscribed to.
Some of the 3rd party advertisers on lunaticoutpost.com may use cookies
to track peformance and/or to serve relevant ads.
If you wish to read more and/or opt out of such cookies, please visit: http://www.networkadvertising.org/choices/