News
news The final part of Britain’s real-life X Files has been released
news Nostradamus 2018 predictions: World War 3 and disaster BUT survivors could live to 200
news Stunning bright light turned night to day over vast swathe of Russia
news What's sending mysterious repeating fast radio bursts in space?
news 19,000-pound Chinese space station falling "uncontrolled" back to Earth
news Scientists could one day make humans immortal
news How 'wi-fi' connects human brains and explains why people have 'gut feelings'
news Scientists predict 'mini ice age' could hit UK by 2030
news Why Did the New York Times Break a UFO Story?
news NASA reveals it has started planning a 2069 mission to Alpha Centauri
news Unsolved Science Mysteries From 2017


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 1.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-06-2018 01:43 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #31
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
Advertisement
[Image: 18.png]
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-06-2018 01:46 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #32
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
[Image: DSiol1PX0AAgnaz.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-06-2018 01:59 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #33
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
[Image: DSxRQvgX0AEAHy_.jpg]
La Nina waters now are warmer than El Nino waters 40 years ago.

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-07-2018 05:45 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #34
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.




00:35s
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
01-07-2018 05:48 AM

 



Post: #35
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
Reality refuses to follow the climate models - debate over.

Hifuck
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
01-07-2018 05:50 AM

 



Post: #36
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
NOAA fakes their buoy data to the upside and gets caught.


Next.....
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-07-2018 06:07 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #37
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-07-2018 05:50 AM)
NOAA fakes their buoy data to the upside and gets caught.


Next.....

you do a very good job at showing how ignorant you can be, how about showing some proof of this alleged 'fake buoy data'

You do realize that the Mail was forced to retract their article claiming NASA was tampering with data by the body that supervises media in the UK?

http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/n...te-change/
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
01-07-2018 07:20 PM

 



Post: #38
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-07-2018 05:48 AM)
Reality refuses to follow the climate models - debate over.

Hifuck

Lmao
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-07-2018 11:56 PM

Posts: 534



Post: #39
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-07-2018 05:48 AM)
Reality refuses to follow the climate models - debate over.

Hifuck

your view of reality from inside your own arsehole really doesn't account for much..

chuckle

did you see the models for the current east coast storm?
I was posting them nearly a week before it hit.. it's all well and good to popularize this 'I am total anti-science dumbfuck and proud' rebellion against reality but it has it's consequences.. like sailing a huge ocean liner with 4k people on board into a raging climate change induced maelstrom that was clearly due to happen.

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-08-2018 01:52 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #40
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (01-07-2018 11:56 PM)
like sailing a huge ocean liner with 4k people on board into a raging climate change induced maelstrom that was clearly due to happen.

Quote:The cruise line initially released a statement, apologizing to travelers that were delayed for the company’s next embarkment, but made no mention of those who weathered the storm.

“Due to winter storm Grayson, Norwegian Breakaway will have a delayed arrival into New York today. As a result, Norwegian Breakaway’s 14 day cruise that was originally scheduled to depart on January 5, will now depart on Saturday, January 6, at 3 p.m. Due to the ship’s late arrival today, and the ongoing weather situation, embarking guests are encouraged to arrive to the pier on Saturday morning. All guests must be onboard by 1 p.m. on January 6. Guests unable to adjust their travel are welcome to board on Friday evening between 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. The ship will now sail a slightly adjusted itinerary, which will be communicated to guests onboard. All guests will receive a refund of one day of their cruise fare, in the form of an onboard credit. We sincerely thank our guests for their understanding of this unexpected change due to the weather and apologize to our guests for any disruption to their schedule,” the statement said.

They later sent a second statement.

“During the early morning hours of January 4, Norwegian Breakaway encountered stronger than forecasted weather conditions due to winter storm Grayson during the trip’s return to New York from the Bahamas. All guests and crew are safe. We sincerely apologize to our guests for these stronger than expected weather conditions and any resulting discomfort they may have experienced,” it read.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/c...6o.twitter

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
01-08-2018 02:58 AM

 



Post: #41
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
If any government on this planet were concerned about "climate change", they would immediately stop their support of global trade.
Moving stuff half way around the planet causes a lot more pollution of all sorts than making it locally and or eating locally native fruits and vegetables.

https://projects.asiaweekly.com/shipping...y-secrets/

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2...l-warming/

This is just the most obvious contradiction in action over speech re "global warming".

Then there's all the climate change gurus that insist on taking their own private jets to these conferences around the world.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/...forum.html

And of course they have to excuse their own behaviour while insisting that we change ours.

https://newrepublic.com/article/144199/a...snt-matter

I'm gonna have to say you are being played.

Don't fall for the bullshit.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/

https://www.iceagenow.info/
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
01-08-2018 03:12 AM

 



Post: #42
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
Whined to a mod did ya?

Don't make no nevermind to me dude.
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-08-2018 03:16 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #43
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-08-2018 03:12 AM)
Whined to a mod did ya?

Don't make no nevermind to me dude.

[Image: C2zRiymVIAAgY31.jpg]

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 1337
01-08-2018 03:20 AM

 



Post: #44
teach RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (01-06-2018 01:00 AM)

U.S. Fails to Submit Reports on 1 January as Required Under U.N. Climate Treaty



The United States has failed to meet a key deadline (January 1, 2018) for submitting a major report, required under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Under Section 12 of the UNFCCC, countries listed in Annex I of the Convention (including the US) are required to periodically submit to the Treaty’s Secretariat a detailed “National Communication,” which presents a wide range of information regarding the nation’s implementation of the agreement. UNFCCC guidelines on reporting and review stipulate use of a common format to facilitate analysis and evaluation and allow for comparisons among the national reports. Further, CSPW sees no indication that this report is even underway; a complete failure to submit this report would be unprecedented.

The Parties to the Convention have agreed that the Annex I parties should submit the reports every four years. The Seventh National Communication (NC7) was due on January 1. Once submitted, these reports are promptly posted by the Secretariat. According to the listing, Submitted National Communications from Annex I Parties, the majority of Annex I Parties have already submitted their reports, but the United States is not one of them.

In addition to the National Communication, the US and other Annex I Parties are required to submit smaller “Biennial Reports” to the Secretariat. Here too, there are specific reporting guidelines. The third such report (BR3) was also due on January 1. According to a table published by the UNFCCC, Submitted Biennial Reports from Annex I Parties, the US is among a minority of countries that still have not submitted a report.

Again, a complete failure by the US to submit these reports would be unprecedented; the US has submitted all six previously required National Communications, traditionally calling them “Climate Action Reports.”

In addition to failing to produce and deliver CAR7 as required, the Department of State under President Trump has eliminated the previously posted CAR6/BR1 (released on December 30, 2013) from its website. The Department of State previously had posted CAR6/BR1 at https://www.state.gov/documents/organiza...19038.pdf. It also eliminated a page devoted to CAR6/BR1 at https://www.state.gov/e/oes/rls/rpts/car6/index.htm (now archived at https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/oes/rls/rp...ndex.htm).

Furthermore, the department eliminated a general webpage on the Climate Action Report at http://www.state.gov/e/oes/climate/clima.../index.htm (it is archived here). The page led with a discussion of BR2 (with a link to the report posted on the UNFCCC), and it ended with a reference to the United States Mid-Century Strategy for Deep Carbonization (November 2016), posted on the White House website. The report has been removed from the White House site, but is archived here


http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2018/...te-treaty/


No doubt that all these rock solid assertions that there is no warming or changes happening due to humans are so profound that people should have no need to violently argue so hard against it and to cover up any research to the contrary .. to reorganize whole government institutions to reissue new directives that virtually outlaw even the mere utterance of it in any department dialouge.

Such concrete evidence for the fact that scientists are staging a communist takeover by launching their hoax back in the 70's not to to get people to reign in their fossil fuel use but to indoctrinate young children to believe that warming is real so they will become socialist when they get older... so Heartland climate change denial Inc. must desperately correct that by infusing children's education with this solid irrefutable proof that anyone that speaks against oil/coal/mining/gas/fracking/nuclear etc etc is working to corrupt capitalist democracy to install a communist dictatorship.


In retaliation, ALL UN climate directors and scientists will be going to lunch in an expensive New York restaurant.

As you can expect, the US government was shocked and terrified at that prospect.

More at 11

Popcorn
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 1337
01-08-2018 04:00 AM

Posts: 534



Post: #45
RE: AGW forced climate change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-08-2018 03:20 AM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (01-06-2018 01:00 AM)

U.S. Fails to Submit Reports on 1 January as Required Under U.N. Climate Treaty



The United States has failed to meet a key deadline (January 1, 2018) for submitting a major report, required under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Under Section 12 of the UNFCCC, countries listed in Annex I of the Convention (including the US) are required to periodically submit to the Treaty’s Secretariat a detailed “National Communication,” which presents a wide range of information regarding the nation’s implementation of the agreement. UNFCCC guidelines on reporting and review stipulate use of a common format to facilitate analysis and evaluation and allow for comparisons among the national reports. Further, CSPW sees no indication that this report is even underway; a complete failure to submit this report would be unprecedented.

The Parties to the Convention have agreed that the Annex I parties should submit the reports every four years. The Seventh National Communication (NC7) was due on January 1. Once submitted, these reports are promptly posted by the Secretariat. According to the listing, Submitted National Communications from Annex I Parties, the majority of Annex I Parties have already submitted their reports, but the United States is not one of them.

In addition to the National Communication, the US and other Annex I Parties are required to submit smaller “Biennial Reports” to the Secretariat. Here too, there are specific reporting guidelines. The third such report (BR3) was also due on January 1. According to a table published by the UNFCCC, Submitted Biennial Reports from Annex I Parties, the US is among a minority of countries that still have not submitted a report.

Again, a complete failure by the US to submit these reports would be unprecedented; the US has submitted all six previously required National Communications, traditionally calling them “Climate Action Reports.”

In addition to failing to produce and deliver CAR7 as required, the Department of State under President Trump has eliminated the previously posted CAR6/BR1 (released on December 30, 2013) from its website. The Department of State previously had posted CAR6/BR1 at https://www.state.gov/documents/organiza...19038.pdf. It also eliminated a page devoted to CAR6/BR1 at https://www.state.gov/e/oes/rls/rpts/car6/index.htm (now archived at https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/oes/rls/rp...ndex.htm).

Furthermore, the department eliminated a general webpage on the Climate Action Report at http://www.state.gov/e/oes/climate/clima.../index.htm (it is archived here). The page led with a discussion of BR2 (with a link to the report posted on the UNFCCC), and it ended with a reference to the United States Mid-Century Strategy for Deep Carbonization (November 2016), posted on the White House website. The report has been removed from the White House site, but is archived here


http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2018/...te-treaty/


No doubt that all these rock solid assertions that there is no warming or changes happening due to humans are so profound that people should have no need to violently argue so hard against it and to cover up any research to the contrary .. to reorganize whole government institutions to reissue new directives that virtually outlaw even the mere utterance of it in any department dialouge.

Such concrete evidence for the fact that scientists are staging a communist takeover by launching their hoax back in the 70's not to to get people to reign in their fossil fuel use but to indoctrinate young children to believe that warming is real so they will become socialist when they get older... so Heartland climate change denial Inc. must desperately correct that by infusing children's education with this solid irrefutable proof that anyone that speaks against oil/coal/mining/gas/fracking/nuclear etc etc is working to corrupt capitalist democracy to install a communist dictatorship.


In retaliation, ALL UN climate directors and scientists will be going to lunch in an expensive New York restaurant.

As you can expect, the US government was shocked and terrified at that prospect.

More at 11

Popcorn

[Image: xVrwJ0n.gif]

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication