News
news China's Chilling 'Social Credit System' Is Straight Out of Dystopian Sci-Fi
news UFO 'death ray' made Korean War GIs sick
news The Haunted States of America
news When the Supernatural Feeds on Us
news Russian space agency says space station hole was deliberate sabotage
news Biblical end of days prophecy COMES TRUE as fish swim again in Dead Sea
news 1950s Science Kit Had Real Uranium
news We're Probably Living in a Simulation, Elon Musk Says
news It’s Now Possible To Telepathically Communicate with a Drone Swarm
news New material to 'speed spacecraft to 134,000,000 mph'
news The future of food: what we’ll eat in 2028


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 12 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Rayne
Registered User
User ID: 447991
07-08-2018 07:15 PM

Posts: 1,686



Post: #16
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Advertisement
Englishman  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:01 PM)
There is nothing but slight correlations in any study between breast and firmula.

Correlations that are better explained by economic condition.

The f*cking UN wants to depopulate!

Agenda 21 queefs!

Breast is best psychos would rather starve the child then give formula.

They have been brainwashed to think they aren’t mothers unless they breastfeed.

Sounds cruel and evil right?

There are twin studies from post-WW2 germany that prove that increased nutrition decreases The likelihood of longterm disease.

No twin studies for breast vs formula!

Fed is best!!!!

Really? They can now put the mothers antibiotics in formula?

IT"S A MIRACLE!!!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 442284
07-08-2018 07:18 PM

 



Post: #17
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
LoP Guest  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:11 PM)
Englishman  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:01 PM)
There is nothing but slight correlations in any study between breast and firmula.

Correlations that are better explained by economic condition.

The f*cking UN wants to depopulate!

Agenda 21 queefs!

Breast is best psychos would rather starve the child then give formula.

They have been brainwashed to think they aren’t mothers unless they breastfeed.

Sounds cruel and evil right?

There are twin studies from post-WW2 germany that prove that increased nutrition decreases The likelihood of longterm disease.

No twin studies for breast vs formula!

Fed is best!!!!

formula does not contain the antibodies and colostrum that breast milk does.

Breast milk carries lead, mercury, and other poisons.

Colostrum only lasts the first few sucks!

WTF does an antibody do professor?

You will not die without antibodies and colostrum. An infant will fail to thrive without adequate carbs, fats, and protein.

Your bidy doesn’t give a sh*t where the calories come from as long as there is enough.

Most woman do not produce enough from their tits so formula is a necessity.

Woman are starving their babies because of the guilt and pressure from the breats is best bit*hes!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 442284
07-08-2018 07:20 PM

 



Post: #18
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Rayne  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:15 PM)
Englishman  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:01 PM)
There is nothing but slight correlations in any study between breast and firmula.

Correlations that are better explained by economic condition.

The f*cking UN wants to depopulate!

Agenda 21 queefs!

Breast is best psychos would rather starve the child then give formula.

They have been brainwashed to think they aren’t mothers unless they breastfeed.

Sounds cruel and evil right?

There are twin studies from post-WW2 germany that prove that increased nutrition decreases The likelihood of longterm disease.

No twin studies for breast vs formula!

Fed is best!!!!

Really? They can now put the mothers antibiotics in formula?

IT"S A MIRACLE!!!

You’re a f*cking dope!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 446990
07-08-2018 07:23 PM

 



Post: #19
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
from op link:

“We were shocked because we didn’t understand how such a small matter like breast-feeding could provoke such a dramatic response,” said the Ecuadorean official, who asked not to be identified because she was afraid of losing her job.

****

formula like vaccines are a way to poison the population especially at an early age to reduce IQ , increase levels of autism

keep the population overall controllable , avoid unwanted competition for positions of influence , and to stunt the development of third world nations as well
Quote this message in a reply
Rayne
Registered User
User ID: 447991
07-08-2018 07:32 PM

Posts: 1,686



Post: #20
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
I found this:


Similac baby formula ingredients
Not to mention that many of those ingredients are highly processed, man-made, or genetically engineered.

Similac Infant Formula – Do Your Research. ...
Nonfat Milk. ...
Lactose. ...
Whey Protein Concentrate. ...
High Oleic Safflower Oil. ...
Soy Oil. ...
Coconut Oil. ...
Cupric Sulfate.

Exploring the Ingredients in Similac Infant Formula - Br
http://www.breastfeedingplace.com/readye...t-formula/

Also this on the same page.

Cupric Sulfate

Cupric sulfate is a pesticide, herbicide and fungicide. It is classified as an irritant, dangerous to the environment, and harmful. Here are some common uses:

Added to swimming pools to prevent algae overgrowth
Used to treat parasitic infections in aquarium fish
Used as a snail removal solution in aquariums
Used to preserve wood
Used in anemia blood tests
Used in chemistry experiments
Quote this message in a reply
Norseman
lop guest
User ID: 440399
07-08-2018 07:36 PM

 



Post: #21
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
The world health officials can kiss my ass and allow women to let their nippers suckle upon their nipples. That's all.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 396457
07-08-2018 07:36 PM

 



Post: #22
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
LoP Guest  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:18 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:11 PM)
formula does not contain the antibodies and colostrum that breast milk does.

Breast milk carries lead, mercury, and other poisons.

Colostrum only lasts the first few sucks!

WTF does an antibody do professor?

You will not die without antibodies and colostrum. An infant will fail to thrive without adequate carbs, fats, and protein.

Your bidy doesn’t give a sh*t where the calories come from as long as there is enough.

Most woman do not produce enough from their tits so formula is a necessity.

Woman are starving their babies because of the guilt and pressure from the breats is best bit*hes!

Seriously? I take it reality TV is your go to place for information.
Quote this message in a reply
Norseman
lop guest
User ID: 440399
07-08-2018 07:41 PM

 



Post: #23
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
What world are we living in when a government gets between a nipple and a baby's mouth. Come on!!!!!!!!!!! The government has no say between a baby's suckling upon
momma's teet.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 449440
07-08-2018 07:45 PM

 



Post: #24
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Why does any country need some resolution to force the spending of big bucks to tell women to breastfeed? I find that insulting. Everyone knows it is best for the baby.

My question is, what is the verbiage in this resolution? Does it say that women can whip out their bare boobs whenever and wherever they want, that companies and schools must have daycare so that breastfeeding moms are close to their babies, that women get fined for not breastfeeding, that stores and businesses and schools must all have a family restroom, that maternity leave has to be 6 months to get a baby on good footage, etc.

Nobody can say this resolution is worth sh*t unless it is there for us to read. Anything else is merely supposition and thus, propaganda.
Quote this message in a reply
Norseman
lop guest
User ID: 440399
07-08-2018 07:48 PM

 



Post: #25
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
I say that it is not complicated for women to breastfeed their nipper.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 261369
07-08-2018 07:49 PM

 



Post: #26
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Maybe someone should inquire as to why half of our children have Chronic Diseases.
"Englishman" seems to be a NWO shill advocating for perpetual customers for the medical cartel.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 449440
07-08-2018 07:50 PM

 



Post: #27
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
LoP Guest  Wrote: (07-08-2018 07:23 PM)
from op link:

“We were shocked because we didn’t understand how such a small matter like breast-feeding could provoke such a dramatic response,” said the Ecuadorean official, who asked not to be identified because she was afraid of losing her job.

****

formula like vaccines are a way to poison the population especially at an early age to reduce IQ , increase levels of autism

keep the population overall controllable , avoid unwanted competition for positions of influence , and to stunt the development of third world nations as well

I didn't get to breastfeed either of my babies because I had to go back to work 3 weeks after my daughter was born and I found out we were moving across country when I was in labor with my son (meaning immediate house-hunting, getting my house ready to sell, etc.). I don't recall what brand of formula I used because that was years ago (kids are in their 20s). Both kids are healthy, they have always been in the upper percentile of intellectual ability, graduated with honors from exclusive college, etc. I think breastfeeding is preferable, but there are reasons not to breastfeed as well. I really don't want the government getting in my business - that is a choice for the family not the government to make.
Quote this message in a reply
idiotchild
Registered User
User ID: 398305
07-08-2018 07:51 PM

Posts: 165



Post: #28
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
LoP Guest  Wrote: (07-08-2018 05:50 PM)
The us makes ALL decisions based on the goal of shortening life expectancy

You mean a government has actually succeeded at something?
Quote this message in a reply
Norseman
lop guest
User ID: 440399
07-08-2018 07:56 PM

 



Post: #29
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
The fact that we are even talking about a woman's freedom to breastfeed her baby means that you leftists are a bunch of psychotic assholes!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 449440
07-08-2018 07:56 PM

 



Post: #30
RE: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Here are the WHO guidelines:

http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/breastfeeding/en/

The WHO says babies should be breastfed for 6 months exclusively and should be breastfed for at least 2 years! Current rates are about 80% of moms breastfeed. That's higher than it's been for decades. I just don't see why we need the government forcing us to do one more thing - especially when most do it anyway.
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication