News
news Nano-Hologram Technology Will Bring 3D Images to Phones, Tablets, and TVs
news UFO hunters spot 'flying disc' near International Space Station
news Mysterious Russian 'killer satellites' spring back to life
news 'Alien megastructure' star is dimming again
news China claims breakthrough in mining 'flammable ice'
news Leaked NSA malware is helping hijack computers around the world
news The London startup hoping to 'build the Matrix'
news Did the biblical Tower of Babel really exist?
news Eeerily Similar 'Crashed UFO' Events 11 Years Apart
news Terrifying 20m-tall rogue waves are actually real
news Hyperloop Highway Would Travel to India In Three Hours



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 25 Vote(s) - 3.4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 08:44 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #1
Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Advertisement
48 evidentiary points that prove the Apollo moon landings were a hoax.

http://www.aulis.com/aulis_apollo.htm
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html
http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Conspir...c341839422
http://www.moonfaker.com/videos.php
http://realitysandwich.com/23226/kubrick_apollo/
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewforum.php...1c08edcc0e
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/M...inPage.HTM

On the other hand, here are some pro-NASA propaganda articles and sites:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/07/...99372.html
http://www.badastronomy.com/index.html
http://www.clavius.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landin...y_theories
http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sci...st23feb_2/
http://www.space.com/19531-moon-landings...video.html
http://www.moonlandinghoax.org/

For research purposes, here's the official link to NASA's photos of the moon landings: http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html



I have 48 points listed below. The issue of whether the International Space Station is a fraud should probably be discussed as well (e.g., http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=720) (I am still a fence sitter on the International Space Station issue).

I’m going to begin collecting videos and proofs for each point. I know that I am missing key items, so please help me make the list and proofs as comprehensive as possible.

(1) a ridiculous looking papier-mâché Lunar Lander that (i) achieved speeds up to 4,000 mph, (ii) which was NEVER even tested on earth, (iii) had an inexplicable ability to maintain life support for several days (the Apollo 17 astronauts were supposedly on the moon for 3 days, 2 hours, 59 minutes and 40 seconds), (iv) could absorb substantial amounts of dust without a problem (the two Apollo 17 astronauts re-entered the Lunar Lander on three occasions after even driving a dune buggy around the surface), (v) remarkably lacked all traces of dust on the landing pads, (vi) had enough room to hitch on a fold-up dune buggy on later flights, (vii) the ascent engine had NEVER been tested, (viii) and included one miraculous air conditioning system in the harshest environment imaginable [the temperature on the moon varies from -387 Fahrenheit (-233 Celsius), at night, to 253 Fahrenheit (123 Celsius) during the day];

(2) no blast crater caused from the Lunar Lander’s 10,000 lb. thruster;

(3) the craft, the Apollo suits, and cameras had no protection from radiation, micrometeorites, and the other elements on the moon and in space including immediate temperature fluctuations of 540 degrees Fahrenheit while in and out of the shade;

(4) a VERY long series of photo fakery and patent proofs of photo editing, e.g., the Michael Collins faked spacewalk photo (for starters, review the photo analyses of Jack White - http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html);

(5) astronauts suspended by wires;

(6) everything was in slow motion, yet everything should have moved quicker;

(7) use of 1960s movie technology, i.e., artificial backdrops (visible scotchlite glass screen) with visible lines;

(8) thousands of beautiful studio qualify photos without the ability to manually adjust aperture, use the viewfinder, etc. and without secondary light sources;

(9) no picture of the stars – ever, even when the astronauts were supposedly orbiting on the dark side of the moon and using long exposure times;

(10) proof of secondary light sources and major shadow discrepancies, including a 130 degrees shadow direction shift over a small area that is clearly not perspective;

(11) the ridiculous Lunar Rover – like NASA would have ever risked attaching a dune buggy on the Lunar Lander or the possibility that it would break down or cause a part to shake loose on one of the astronaut’s suit due to it hitting a large bump or crashing (think about this one);

(12) using circular windows to fake an unremarkable image of the earth, with a cloud that spans the entire diameter of the earth;

(13) no one has been beyond 400 miles above the earth for nearly 42 years (last time on the moon was December 14, 1972) and yet were able to do it easily in 1969 and travel a minimum of 234,000 miles to the moon;

(14) the astronauts sat on top of a 10,000 lb. thruster but noise was not an issue in the recordings;

(15) a disappearing Lunar Lander on the moon in the photos and repeated use of similar mountain backdrops in what should have been different areas;

(16) strange and nonexistent tracks of the Lunar Rover; also, Lunar Rover tracks when the Lunar Rover hadn't been unpackaged;

(17) the sun appears to be a giant light bulb;

(18) American patriotic symbols – always perfect in the photos;

(19) remarkable boot prints with no moisture;

(20) the film of the ascension stage of the Lunar Lander – laughable footage filmed by the astronaut who stayed behind to watch and who idiotically panned out and up (of course NASA claims it did it by remote 234,000 miles away) and then beamed the footage back to earth - and we didn't even have decent television remotes at that time;

(21) the Command Module orbits a fake moon;

(22) the billowing American flag – oops;

(23) the 200 yard touchdown pass – wait how come we didn’t see that or other great feats?;

(24) the Van Allen Radiation Belts and other severe cosmic radiation;

(25) the first moonwalkers’ press conference – the unwilling liars’ affair;

(26) the video footage of the docking Lunar Lander appears eerily similar and fake as Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey";

(27) the discrepancies of the moonwalkers, did they see stars or not?;

(28) the astronaut who almost fell over – the magic show;

(29) perfect performing 1960s technology that cannot be matched today;

(30) the “spectacular” photos of the landing sites on the moon … wait a second they suck;

(31) losing the footage, diagrams, etc.;

(32) the radio controlled dune buggy;

(33) the moon rock that became petrified wood and the fact that von Braun just happened to take a trip to Antarctica with NASA's management shortly before the Apollo moon landing missions, which is the same very place where moon rocks can be found on earth;

(34) third party stage hands appearing on video when there should only be two astronauts;

(35) the inadequate space and impossibility for three astronauts to live for approximately 12 days in space in a tiny craft while stuck only in a sitting position;

(36) the gray color of the soil on the moon is the wrong color;

(37) impossibly quick answers between those supposedly on the moon and NASA (timing delay off);

(38) the earth is pictured too small from the moon (the earth would be 4x the diameter of the moon);

(39) the unreasonable jump to landing on the moon and alleged jumps in technology in a span of only 11 years;

(40) the Command Module did not have enough fuel to make it to the moon and back since the gravitational pull of the earth extends all the way to the moon;

(41) the Apollo astronauts' suits were clearly not pressurized - they should have looked like the Michelin Man; also, one of the astronauts appears to even have a bare hand during one video segment;

(42) the minerals kicked up by the European Space Agency’s SMART-1 probe were different to the Apollo rocks;

(43) 60% of the much simpler Lunar Lander testing vehicles crashed (supposedly used by the astronauts to prepare for actually landing the real Lunar Lander);

(44) Von Braun said in his book '"Conquest To The Moon" (published in 1953) that it would be impossible to send anyone to the moon because of the sheer size of craft needed to do the trip; taking Von Braun's calculations into consideration, a spaceship that needed to travel that distance would have had to be 266 times bigger than the Saturn 5;

(45) the broken strut on the Lunar Lander;

(46) the lunar soil in the Apollo pictures is nothing more than Portland cement; and,

(47) NASA has now admitted that the Van Allen Radiation Belts ("an area of dangerous radiation"), prevent human travel: "Radiation like this can harm the guidance systems, onboard computers, or other electronics on Orion . . . Naturally, we have to pass through this dangerous zone [Van Allen Radiation Belts] twice – once up and once back . . . Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study. We must solve these challenges before we put people through this region of space."

(48) The best alleged “proofs” that NASA made it to the moon – the moon reflectors (proof of nothing, which would be covered in dust by now anyway), the landing site photos, (a laughable and PhotoShop joke), the testimonies (varying and peculiar), moon rocks (which are unaccounted for and can be found on earth and sometimes turn into petrified wood), the moon/hammer experiment (possibly faked with wires and impossible with the pressurized suit to hold the feather with finger tips), and the ham radio operators (how did they know the transmission came from the surface of the moon and not just a satellite, assuming they weren’t paid shills) – is this really the best NASA could think of to prove such a historic event?
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2015 06:00 PM by Rothbard.) Quote this message in a reply

Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 08:49 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #2
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
So the Lunar Lander, the supposed remarkable piece of equipment that carried many astronauts safely to the moon in the most harshest environment and conditions, was NEVER tested on earth in front of a camera.

One common objection I hear is that the Lunar Lander could not have been tested on earth because of the lack of a vacuum. Well it appears that NASA didn't get that information and tried to test a lunar lander on earth.

Truthfully, this is what would have happened in real life if the paiper mache Lunar Lander was actually capable of flight.



Quote this message in a reply
The Evil AC
I am not a number!!!
User ID: 666
11-25-2014 08:51 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Go away...
Quote this message in a reply
Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 08:52 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #4
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Was our technology extraordinarily error free? Don't you think that Armstrong would have been a little nervous to fly an untested ridiculous craft after an event like this?



Quote this message in a reply
Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 09:12 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #5
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
These images alone should win the debate. There is no way in hell that two astronauts were able to survive in this piece of junk for three days on the moon in the harshest environment. There is no way in hell that this piece of junk survived the descending and ascension stages at speeds of 4,000 mph. There is no way in hell that this piece of junk could fit a fold-up dune buggy and all of the other equipment and supplies necessary to carry out the mission. How many extra batteries would be needed? What kind of 60s air conditioning was necessary? How did they keep the dust out? How many extra parts were needed?

[Image: LunarLander4_zps0e6b4356.jpg]

[Image: LunarLander1_zpsa9bdf624.jpg]

[Image: LunarLander3_zps54cc6159.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 11-25-2014 09:25 PM by Rothbard.) Quote this message in a reply
Don Chocolate
lop guest
User ID: 140798
11-25-2014 09:14 PM

 



Post: #6
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard
Quote this message in a reply
Spank The Monkey
'cause he's been naughty...
User ID: 169281
11-25-2014 09:15 PM

Posts: 26,934



Post: #7
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
The Legend of Sexual Chocolate  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:14 PM)
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard

Moontards. They are extra 'tardy" Jhikpghf

[Image: 8UoBaRt.png]
Quote this message in a reply
Ghenghis
Registered User
User ID: 267064
11-25-2014 09:16 PM

Posts: 12,496



Post: #8
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
The Legend of Sexual Chocolate  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:14 PM)
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard

Jptdknpa
Quote this message in a reply
MrGemini
Registered User
User ID: 200240
11-25-2014 09:16 PM

Posts: 4,921



Post: #9
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Spank The Monkey  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:15 PM)
The Legend of Sexual Chocolate  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:14 PM)
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard

Moontards. They are extra 'tardy" Jhikpghf

JhikpghfJhikpghf
Quote this message in a reply
Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 09:16 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #10
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
The Legend of Sexual Chocolate  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:14 PM)
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard

Please post the pictures so everyone here can stand in awe of the high quality pictures that certainly could not have been faked by an amateur.
Quote this message in a reply
CourtDudeThere is nothing to lose
User ID: 55747
11-25-2014 09:22 PM

Posts: 42,584



Post: #11
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Rothbard  Wrote: (11-25-2014 08:52 PM)
Was our technology extraordinarily error free? Don't you think that Armstrong would have been a little nervous to fly an untested ridiculous craft after an event like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJa4yQ0AIbU

The first few flights of virtually every test bed will crash.

Here is the video where Armstrong 'successfully' flies it...

I does look like a rough ride.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlJGQ92IgFk

'Cause it's already lost
In a runaway world
Of confusion
I'm not gonna take it.
That's why I fight fire with fire.
(This post was last modified: 11-25-2014 09:22 PM by CourtDude.) Quote this message in a reply
MrGemini
Registered User
User ID: 200240
11-25-2014 09:22 PM

Posts: 4,921



Post: #12
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Rothbard  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:16 PM)
The Legend of Sexual Chocolate  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:14 PM)
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard

Please post the pictures so everyone here can stand in awe of the high quality pictures that certainly could not have been faked by an amateur.

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photo of Apollo 17 landing site

[Image: 5474d68c59d3f.jpeg]
Quote this message in a reply
PopEye
The Sailor Man
User ID: 228988
11-25-2014 09:28 PM

Posts: 38,965



Post: #13
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
Rothbard  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:16 PM)
The Legend of Sexual Chocolate  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:14 PM)
no. the pictures of the landing site and rover and the tracks on the moon win the debate. you are just being a tard

Please post the pictures so everyone here can stand in awe of the high quality pictures that certainly could not have been faked by an amateur.
Sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder.

I Yam what I Yam!
-
[Image: rVy21y4.gif]
-
(This post was last modified: 11-25-2014 09:28 PM by PopEye.) Quote this message in a reply
Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 09:28 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #14
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
CourtDude  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:22 PM)
Rothbard  Wrote: (11-25-2014 08:52 PM)
Was our technology extraordinarily error free? Don't you think that Armstrong would have been a little nervous to fly an untested ridiculous craft after an event like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJa4yQ0AIbU

The first few flights of virtually every test bed will crash.

Here is the video where Armstrong 'successfully' flies it...

I does look like a rough ride.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlJGQ92IgFk

There was no flying of the Lunar Lander EVER on earth. The one that Armstrong crashed was the practice vehicle. The practice vehicle crashed and was not rebuilt (based on memory). Yet, we're supposed to believe that Lunar Lander required no testing. Ridiculous!
Quote this message in a reply
Rothbard
Check Out My Cool Space Ship
User ID: 243708
11-25-2014 09:31 PM

Posts: 2,684



Post: #15
RE: Moon Landings and Other NASA BS
MrGemini  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:22 PM)
Rothbard  Wrote: (11-25-2014 09:16 PM)
Please post the pictures so everyone here can stand in awe of the high quality pictures that certainly could not have been faked by an amateur.

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photo of Apollo 17 landing site

[Image: 5474d68c59d3f.jpeg]

Wow! Spectacular photos that could never have been faked. I hope my sarcasm is evident.
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication