News
news China's Chilling 'Social Credit System' Is Straight Out of Dystopian Sci-Fi
news UFO 'death ray' made Korean War GIs sick
news The Haunted States of America
news When the Supernatural Feeds on Us
news Russian space agency says space station hole was deliberate sabotage
news Biblical end of days prophecy COMES TRUE as fish swim again in Dead Sea
news 1950s Science Kit Had Real Uranium
news We're Probably Living in a Simulation, Elon Musk Says
news It’s Now Possible To Telepathically Communicate with a Drone Swarm
news New material to 'speed spacecraft to 134,000,000 mph'
news The future of food: what we’ll eat in 2028


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 2.14 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 09:55 PM

 



Post: #31
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
Advertisement
When you achieve the velocity to break earth's gravity, at what point does the earth rotate away from the rocket at 1000mph... rhetorical question, it doesn't.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:02 PM

 



Post: #32
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:23 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:15 PM)
It's 2018 Bud. We supposedly have rovers on Mars, thousands of satellites in orbit, and probes all up in Uranus. A simple picture of the Earth from space or a video of it rotating that's not computer generated would do.

You don't understand how space and distance in space works ya dolt f*cking retard.

-A rover in mars doesn't have the camera strong enough to video tape earth. mars isn't a f*cking moon in earths orbit. You need a strong telelscope /video sky cam on the rover. ...What stupid comment from you

-The same with probes, probes are not designed to posses massive telescopes , you know since Uranus isn't really close to earth. what a stupid comment from you

-And finally your orbit idiotic statement. Being in orbit is too close, so you cant get a full circumference of earth. there are a ton of videos of earth and sat pics but all you flat earthers cry that the lens is causing the curvature bla bla bla..

I can go on if you like.

No, do go on, tell us about how much wattage it would take to send clear signals back and forth between earth and mars, twice through the ionosphere in an intensely irradiated vacuum without that pesky inverse square bit sufficient to control a remote controlled vehicle that takes pictures that often look suspiciously, and often exactly, like Greenland. Voyager still able to do it at 11 billion miles eh? Go on all you like, BS is still gonna be BS, it's not other folks' problem if you don't know what BS smells like.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 385076
10-10-2018 10:08 PM

 



Post: #33
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
daersoulkeeper  Wrote: (10-09-2018 09:58 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2018 09:57 PM)
Flat Earth Retard News^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

what i believe has nothing to do with what is shown here. If you can't see that rocket's height is clearly not going to space and it clearly is coming back down again, you sir are WILLFULLY blind.
I clearly see it following the curvature of the earth. I have witnessed several launches from Vandenberg with my own eyes. They do not fall back to earth
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:10 PM

 



Post: #34
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 09:55 PM)
When you achieve the velocity to break earth's gravity, at what point does the earth rotate away from the rocket at 1000mph... rhetorical question, it doesn't.

Speaking of velocity... how do those rocket nose cones survive the friction when the SR-71 "Blackbird" for example barely survives Mach 3? Nice little bunker they have there under the launch pad, wonder what they use that for, maybe the crushing G-force isn't so bad when you're sipping coffee in a concrete bunker. Wake up. You know how many green screen fugups that are now archived on youtube just for the ISS alone? Space shuttle gliders with Jet Engines and Piggy Back planes.. it's a show.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:13 PM

 



Post: #35
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:08 PM)
daersoulkeeper  Wrote: (10-09-2018 09:58 PM)
what i believe has nothing to do with what is shown here. If you can't see that rocket's height is clearly not going to space and it clearly is coming back down again, you sir are WILLFULLY blind.
I clearly see it following the curvature of the earth. I have witnessed several launches from Vandenberg with my own eyes. They do not fall back to earth

I saw guys getting eat by dinosaurs, seen a guy make the statue of liberty disappear, even seen a guy saw a woman in half in a box... it was amazing... for a few years.
What you are seeing is not 'following' curvature, it's an arc that goes out of your visual range and splashes down into the ocean, always has.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 385076
10-10-2018 10:15 PM

 



Post: #36
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:15 PM)
Eustace Muffins  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:06 PM)
How about we all THINK!

1. earth is a globe, and a satellite must go into an orbit AROUND that globe it has to go into a curve at some moment, only going up will not do it at all!. So at some point in flight they start to turn the rocket over.

2. When things go away from you the apparent size of the object will get smaller and smaller and the apparent height will get lower and lower, so a rocket flying away from you will APPEAR to go down, just like you FlatEarthers think the sun will set over the flat earth.....

3. Even when rockets don't go into space the earth will be a globe.... or can you explain how the observations of a sun set is possible on the flat earth? For me it is impossible to get it working.

It's 2018 Bud. We supposedly have rovers on Mars, thousands of satellites in orbit, and probes all up in Uranus. A simple picture of the Earth from space or a video of it rotating that's not computer generated would do.
All pictures taken by digital cameras ARE CGI. No exceptions. That what digital photography is a computer generated image. No one is going to send a film camera into space to satisfy some fringe lunatics.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:18 PM

 



Post: #37
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:15 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:15 PM)
It's 2018 Bud. We supposedly have rovers on Mars, thousands of satellites in orbit, and probes all up in Uranus. A simple picture of the Earth from space or a video of it rotating that's not computer generated would do.
All pictures taken by digital cameras ARE CGI. No exceptions. That what digital photography is a computer generated image. No one is going to send a film camera into space to satisfy some fringe lunatics.

Yeah film doesn't hold up well against radiation, it did in the 60's and 70's when NASA used it of course, but for the rest of the world, no.
Quote this message in a reply
engineering
Persuade, Change, Influence
User ID: 433324
10-10-2018 10:20 PM

Posts: 2,312



Post: #38
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
Here's this enjoy
[Image: himawari04.gif.CROP.original-original.gif]

But I don't think that it was a satellite launch at all it was some type of test.
[Image: FPiPmCd.png]
[Image: pXkPaJb.png]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:25 PM

 



Post: #39
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
engineering  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:20 PM)
Here's this enjoy
link to image: http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/b...iginal.gif

But I don't think that it was a satellite launch at all it was some type of test.
link to image: https://i.imgur.com/FPiPmCd.png
link to image: https://i.imgur.com/pXkPaJb.png

Top image, about 10:00 left side, right as the shadow is 70%, there some small clouds doing a good 200-300 mph.. lol At least they have learned to move the clouds around, now they just need to make sure they do so realistically.
Quote this message in a reply
engineering
Persuade, Change, Influence
User ID: 433324
10-10-2018 10:28 PM

Posts: 2,312



Post: #40
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:25 PM)
engineering  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:20 PM)
Here's this enjoy
link to image: http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/b...iginal.gif

But I don't think that it was a satellite launch at all it was some type of test.
link to image: https://i.imgur.com/FPiPmCd.png
link to image: https://i.imgur.com/pXkPaJb.png

Top image, about 10:00 left side, right as the shadow is 70%, there some small clouds doing a good 200-300 mph.. lol At least they have learned to move the clouds around, now they just need to make sure they do so realistically.

Yea that caught my eye also tbh even before you said something I figured it was just fast moving because of the time lapse.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 385076
10-10-2018 10:29 PM

 



Post: #41
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:18 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:15 PM)
All pictures taken by digital cameras ARE CGI. No exceptions. That what digital photography is a computer generated image. No one is going to send a film camera into space to satisfy some fringe lunatics.

Yeah film doesn't hold up well against radiation, it did in the 60's and 70's when NASA used it of course, but for the rest of the world, no.
And those cameras were specially shielded and very expensive as well Cheers
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:33 PM

 



Post: #42
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:29 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:18 PM)
Yeah film doesn't hold up well against radiation, it did in the 60's and 70's when NASA used it of course, but for the rest of the world, no.
And those cameras were specially shielded and very expensive as well Cheers

Yeha... aluminum shielding, we've heard. The Kodak film that dude bought in a drugstore seemed to work with no shielding at all, odd that.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 465004
10-10-2018 10:37 PM

 



Post: #43
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:29 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-10-2018 10:18 PM)
Yeah film doesn't hold up well against radiation, it did in the 60's and 70's when NASA used it of course, but for the rest of the world, no.
And those cameras were specially shielded and very expensive as well Cheers

Most folks heard the recent multiple admissions by NASA that we can't go beyond low earth orbit, and yet you're still clinging to the moon landing?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 396953
10-11-2018 12:19 AM

 



Post: #44
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
Spiddy  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:18 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:15 PM)
It's 2018 Bud. We supposedly have rovers on Mars, thousands of satellites in orbit, and probes all up in Uranus. A simple picture of the Earth from space or a video of it rotating that's not computer generated would do.

Pics of the edge or GTFO.

That is what flat Earth believers will never produce. Because they cannot. One would think the most obvious proof would be to simply take a photo of the edge of the earth. Case solved. Lol.
Quote this message in a reply
daersoulkeeper
Registered User
User ID: 116126
10-11-2018 01:44 AM

Posts: 1,254



Post: #45
RE: SpaceX Rocket Footage shown not going into space while claiming the opposite
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 12:19 AM)
Spiddy  Wrote: (10-09-2018 10:18 PM)
Pics of the edge or GTFO.

That is what flat Earth believers will never produce. Because they cannot. One would think the most obvious proof would be to simply take a photo of the edge of the earth. Case solved. Lol.

What kind of lunatic thinks taking a picture hundreds of miles into a frozen restricted area wasteland is easy?

You would need major money. Then you would have to go in without permission thus invisible and in a life threatening circumstance. The real question you should be asking is where is the video of earth in space that isn't obvious cgi (you know clouds moving... lights changing....etc... 15,000 satellites all have the ability unlike the thing you just claimed was easy where nobody is.

You just major brainwashed bro. You believe in a faerie tale because you were brought up looking at a plastic globe in your classroom and told stories / shown the worst looking lamest footage in all of history.

Not sure why I bothered, I know if I was God there wouldn't be a thing I could say to you that would change your mind
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication