News
news China's Chilling 'Social Credit System' Is Straight Out of Dystopian Sci-Fi
news UFO 'death ray' made Korean War GIs sick
news The Haunted States of America
news When the Supernatural Feeds on Us
news Russian space agency says space station hole was deliberate sabotage
news Biblical end of days prophecy COMES TRUE as fish swim again in Dead Sea
news 1950s Science Kit Had Real Uranium
news We're Probably Living in a Simulation, Elon Musk Says
news It’s Now Possible To Telepathically Communicate with a Drone Swarm
news New material to 'speed spacecraft to 134,000,000 mph'
news The future of food: what we’ll eat in 2028


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428465
10-11-2018 06:18 PM

 



Post: #1
Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
Advertisement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90olwwLdEYg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0WjV6MmCyM

The Hypercube or Tesseract is supposed to be the 4th dimension (not time but other) of the 3d cube. They calculated this as an 8 faceted object based on the formula of 2 points make a line. 4 lines make a square. 6 squares make a cube. Therefore 8 cubes must make a tesseract. However, the +2 may just be a coincidence.

When one has the origin of a POINT of SINGULAIRTY, which is the start (0d).... you have a different pattern.

6 squares make a cube in 3d
4 lines make a square in 2d
2 points make a line in 1d
1 pos (point of singularity) makes the 0d

The pattern seems to be 1, 2, 4, 6,.... therefore 8 is no longer automatically intuitive for this pattern of what a 4th dimensional shape would be from a cube.

???

This line of thinking is only addressing the POINT to CUBE progression. The question is does the TESSERACT have to be 8 facets.

BTW, the Tesseract when shown as an object is really only pretending to be the "shadow" of itself.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428465
10-11-2018 06:25 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
In fact taking it in the other direction one more step, you have NIL.

and the following pattern emerges:

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- ?

+1 +1 +2 +2

so the most logical next steps are actually either +3 (add one more to the last adding amount)

or

+4 (double the last adding amount)

The new hypercube in this case would be 9 or 10 facets, not 8.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428465
10-11-2018 06:27 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 06:25 PM)
In fact taking it in the other direction one more step, you have NIL.

and the following pattern emerges:

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- ?

+1 +1 +2 +2

so the most logical next steps are actually either +3 (add one more to the last adding amount)

or

+4 (double the last adding amount)

The new hypercube in this case would be 9 or 10 facets, not 8.

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 9

or

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 10
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428465
10-11-2018 06:32 PM

 



Post: #4
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
anyone...anyone?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 429200
10-11-2018 07:37 PM

 



Post: #5
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
Taking this same logic from a tetrahedron (and maybe this is what they already came up with):

NIL (0)
POS (1 pt of sing.)
LINE = 2 points
TRIANGLE = 3 lines
TETRAHEDRON = 4 triangles
HYPER-TETRAHEDRON = 5 tetrahedrons in 4th dimension shape
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 429200
10-11-2018 07:49 PM

 



Post: #6
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 for Hyper-Tetra
0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 9 for Hyper-Cube alt 1

now divide

na -- 1 -- 1 -- 0.75 -- 0.6667 -- 0.5556


0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 for Hyper-Tetra
0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 10 for Hyper-Cube alt 2

now divide

na -- 1 -- 1 -- 0.75 -- 0.6667 -- 0.5000


0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 for Hyper-Tetra
0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 8 for Hyper-Cube (common)

now divide

na -- 1 -- 1 -- 0.75 -- 0.6667 -- 0.625


which one is correct?
Quote this message in a reply
lil bird
Registered User
User ID: 432407
10-11-2018 08:08 PM

Posts: 1,726



Post: #7
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
What happens to the Tesseract Odin was storing in Asgard?

"Music, as far as I have seen in the world so far, is the only real magic that I know." TP
Quote this message in a reply
lil bird
Registered User
User ID: 432407
10-11-2018 08:15 PM

Posts: 1,726



Post: #8
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
[Image: D1MQP3ZNTKP3RBB04DGCTFHPAA.gif]

"Music, as far as I have seen in the world so far, is the only real magic that I know." TP
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452637
10-11-2018 08:31 PM

 



Post: #9
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
lil bird  Wrote: (10-11-2018 08:15 PM)
link to image: http://hi.gher.space/dl/D1MQP3ZNTKP3RBB04DGCTFHPAA.gif

8 seems to make the math work out however it's a 3d visualization projected to 4d, how sure can we be about it?

Are other interpretations possible?
Quote this message in a reply
lil bird
Registered User
User ID: 432407
10-11-2018 09:00 PM

Posts: 1,726



Post: #10
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 08:31 PM)
lil bird  Wrote: (10-11-2018 08:15 PM)
link to image: http://hi.gher.space/dl/D1MQP3ZNTKP3RBB04DGCTFHPAA.gif

8 seems to make the math work out however it's a 3d visualization projected to 4d, how sure can we be about it?

Are other interpretations possible?

how many cells are visable in the image and how many are not?

"Music, as far as I have seen in the world so far, is the only real magic that I know." TP
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452637
10-11-2018 09:28 PM

 



Post: #11
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
lil bird  Wrote: (10-11-2018 09:00 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 08:31 PM)
8 seems to make the math work out however it's a 3d visualization projected to 4d, how sure can we be about it?

Are other interpretations possible?

how many cells are visable in the image and how many are not?

The traditional count is "one inside, one outside, 6 other", is there another way to arrange/count?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 467418
10-11-2018 09:33 PM

 



Post: #12
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 06:27 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 06:25 PM)
In fact taking it in the other direction one more step, you have NIL.

and the following pattern emerges:

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- ?

+1 +1 +2 +2

so the most logical next steps are actually either +3 (add one more to the last adding amount)

or

+4 (double the last adding amount)

The new hypercube in this case would be 9 or 10 facets, not 8.

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 9

or

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 10

what about...6+6=12chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452637
10-11-2018 09:39 PM

 



Post: #13
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 09:33 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-11-2018 06:27 PM)
0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 9

or

0 -- 1 -- 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 10

what about...6+6=12chuckle

It is possible, but it does not match any pattern I see. 10 seems the most intuitive to me.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452637
10-11-2018 09:41 PM

 



Post: #14
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
0
1
2
4
6
10
14
22
30
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 452637
10-11-2018 09:45 PM

 



Post: #15
RE: Hypercube or Tesseract logic may be off - the pattern is not necessarily +2.
As Sagan admitted "how do we know? we can't see into the 4d world with 3d eyes..."

The traditional hypercube we "see" is supposed to be only a shadow or wireframe projection of what the "actual" is. how can we be sure of a projection even? we can't wrap our heads around 4d so I would assume that the "8" facets could just be a guess.
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication