News
news The Mystery of the Belmez Faces
news NASA to test ‘space lasers’ with latest launch
news Satellite Images Of Strange Lost City in the South Pacific
news Do Aliens Come From Under the Oceans?
news Bizarre Paranormal Mysteries of World War I
news Human brains and bodies could be hacked to create life in hostile environments
news Nuke fallout alert as Russian radioactive leak sweeps across Europe
news Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
news Government Files and the Abominable Snowman
news Mind-Controlled Drone Swarms Could Soon Put More Eyes in the Sky
news How America’s National Parks Became Hotbeds of Paranormal Activity



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 36 Vote(s) - 1.56 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Natura Naturans
Registered User
User ID: 403976
02-21-2017 07:15 PM

Posts: 10,466



Post: #46
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Advertisement
Turkey456  Wrote: (02-21-2017 07:04 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (02-21-2017 06:30 PM)
The Democrats are devastated by their recent lost elections. They will be even more devastated as we learn the details of their massive global warming fraud. Dr. John Bates, a former high level NOAA scientist, set off a furor by revealing that a recent NOAA paper, which claimed global warming hadn’t “paused” during the past 20 years, was fraudulent. The paper was timed to undergird Obama’s signing of the hugely expensive Paris climate agreement. This is only a tiny fraction of the climate fraud. Fortunately, high-tech research has finally sorted out the “mystery factor” in our recent climate changes—and it’s mostly not CO2. Even redoubling carbon dioxide, by itself, would raise earth’s temperature only 1.1 degree. That’s significant, but not dangerous. CERN, the world’s top particle physics laboratory, just found that our big, abrupt climate changes are produced by variations in the...(Read Full Article)

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/...qus_thread

PAGE NOT FOUND? crap

The link should be this:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017...data_.html

“The highest activity a human being can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand is to be free.” --Baruch Spinoza
Quote this message in a reply

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
02-21-2017 07:28 PM

Posts: 35,536



Post: #47
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
[Image: jf5h6GN5?format=jpg&name=600x314]

Fracking Caused 6,648 Spills in Four States Alone, Duke Study Finds


Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has long been tied to environmental risks such as spills. The frequency of spills, however, has long been murky since states do not release standardized data.

Estimates from the U.S. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) vary wildly.

"The number of spills nationally could range from approximately 100 to 3,700 spills annually, assuming 25,000 to 30,000 new wells are fractured per year," the agency said in a June 2015 report. Also, the EPA reported only 457 spills related to fracking in 11 states between 2006 and 2012.

But now, a new study suggests that fracking-related spills occur at a much higher rate.

The analysis, published Feb. 21 in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, revealed 6,648 spills in four states alone—Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota and Pennsylvania—in 10 years.

The researchers determined that up to 16 percent of fracked oil and gas wells spill hydrocarbons, chemically laden water, fracking fluids and other substances.

For the study, the researchers examined state-level spill data to characterize spills associated with unconventional oil and gas development at 31,481 fracked wells in the four states between 2005 and 2014.

"On average, that's equivalent to 55 spills per 1,000 wells in any given year," lead author Lauren Patterson, a policy associate at Duke University's Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, told ResearchGate.

North Dakota reported the highest spill rate, with 4,453 incidents. Pennsylvania reported 1,293, Colorado reported 476 and New Mexico reported 426. The researchers created an interactive map of spill sites in the four states.

Although North Dakota is rich in oil, the state's higher spill rate can be explained by varying state reporting requirements. North Dakota is required to report any spill larger than 42 gallons whereas requirement in Colorado and New Mexico is 210 gallons.

Patterson points out that the different reporting requirements are a problem.

"Our study concludes that making state spill data more uniform and accessible could provide stakeholders with important information on where to target efforts for locating and preventing future spills," she told ResearchGate. "States would benefit from setting reporting requirements that generate actionable information—that is, information regulators and industry can use to identify and respond to risk 'hot spots.' It would also be beneficial to standardize how spills are reported. This would improve accuracy and make the data usable to understand spill risks."
more:
http://www.ecowatch.com/fracking-spills-...74733.html

EPA Watered Down Major Fracking Study to Downplay Water Contamination Risks

http://www.ecowatch.com/epa-fracking-stu...12963.html

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
Apostle of Reality
Registered User
User ID: 367766
02-21-2017 07:34 PM

Posts: 6,406



Post: #48
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Everything is up for debate.

Including the veracity of the data collected.

All Rights Reserved.

Fair Use Notice: 17 U.S.C. § 107. Small sections of copyrighted work may be present in my posts, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

“Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.” - Alejandro Jodorowsky

Democracy dies in darkness.....
Quote this message in a reply
Turkey456
Registered User
User ID: 397348
02-21-2017 07:38 PM

Posts: 1,548



Post: #49
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Natura Naturans  Wrote: (02-21-2017 07:15 PM)
Turkey456  Wrote: (02-21-2017 07:04 PM)
PAGE NOT FOUND? crap

The link should be this:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017...data_.html

Great, that's it, thanks.
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
02-21-2017 07:39 PM

Posts: 35,536



Post: #50
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
[Image: HL5AWFmm?format=jpg&name=600x314]
Quote this message in a reply
Apostle of Reality
Registered User
User ID: 367766
02-21-2017 07:54 PM

Posts: 6,406



Post: #51
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
This thought seems oddly familiar for some reason.

Ahh, I know. This book, is truth. It is not up for debate.

[Image: iStock_000000535182XSmall-300x241.jpg]

Sounds like we're getting into religion territory here.

All Rights Reserved.

Fair Use Notice: 17 U.S.C. § 107. Small sections of copyrighted work may be present in my posts, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

“Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.” - Alejandro Jodorowsky

Democracy dies in darkness.....
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
02-21-2017 08:06 PM

Posts: 35,536



Post: #52
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
[Image: C5JztjgUoAA_xt1.jpg]

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 404724
02-21-2017 08:12 PM

 



Post: #53
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (02-21-2017 08:06 PM)
link to image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5JztjgUoAA_xt1.jpg

And this is what happens when fear spreading shitbags spread disinformation about fossil fuel production.



Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 405907
02-21-2017 08:32 PM

 



Post: #54
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
The Stupidity of the bought and paid for Global Climate SCIENCE Mass Eugenics Justification TAX Program is NOT DEBATABLE.
Quote this message in a reply
Damrod
Seeker of knowledge
User ID: 395019
02-21-2017 08:36 PM

Posts: 12,967



Post: #55
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Whew!....that's good....I was getting tired of trying to explain to the idiots that their new religion is filled with lots of flaws.

This planet will be just fine. Whether talking monkeys will still be around is another question.

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas Jefferson

"Liberty means responsibility, which is why most men dread it." George Bernard Shaw

"Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotism"...Aristotle
Quote this message in a reply
Pike
Registered User
User ID: 405328
02-21-2017 08:46 PM

Posts: 593



Post: #56
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/...rming.html

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.

Popcorn

http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com
Bitcoin - 1Pr9Ba3WB8kKRurDKMCm61hGf7YjGvrqY1
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 407860
02-21-2017 08:54 PM

 



Post: #57
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (02-21-2017 07:39 PM)
link to image: https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/833191160...me=600x314

You will be punished, Americans...
Look at this map
Your country and Russia, the most affected with the global warming
Keep thinking that this is not happening, bunch of idiots

S977S977Srjceahddoomed
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 251371
02-21-2017 08:56 PM

 



Post: #58
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (02-21-2017 08:54 PM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (02-21-2017 07:39 PM)
link to image: https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/833191160...me=600x314

You will be punished, Americans...
Look at this map
Your country and Russia, the most affected with the global warming
Keep thinking that this is not happening, bunch of idiots

S977S977Srjceahddoomed

PBS is Fake News.

Shut up.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 407445
02-21-2017 09:22 PM

 



Post: #59
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (02-21-2017 06:48 PM)
Roddy  Wrote: (02-21-2017 06:01 PM)
This^^

Once you understand this simple fact, the debate is over.

Joanne Nova aka JoNova (real name Joanne Codling), born circa 1967, is an Australian right wing communicator who mainly writes to promote anti-science views of climate in books and a denialist weblog, joannenova.com.au. She has no evident academic background in climate science; her degree (B.Sc.) is in molecular biology.[1] Nova is based in Perth, Western Australia.

Nova runs the Australian company Science Speak,[2] the main aim of which is to promote AGW denialism.
For four years, Nova worked for the Shell Questacon Science Circus, based in Canberra, Australia. The Science Circus is an outreach program run by Questacon, the Australian National Science and Technology Centre. The program is sponsored by Shell Oil, with additional support from Australian National University. She has also worked for Foxtel, a cable television company part owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Joanne_Nova


once you understand this you will know she and her blogs are full of sh*t just like the other big-oil sponsored science hating moron magnet sites

Sourcewatch again? Really?

SourceWatch is a propaganda site funded by an extreme left-wing, anti-capitalist and anti-corporate organization, the Center for Media and Democracy. Just like the untrustworthy Wikipedia the content can be written and edited by ordinary web users. Users who all conveniently share an extreme left-wing bias. SourceWatch is frequently cited by those seeking to smear individuals and organizations who do not share their extreme left-wing bias since they cannot find any legitimate criticisms from respected news sources.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8AB1zyRv2s

Read more:

http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/10...watch.html

OP is desperate
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 242904
02-21-2017 09:25 PM

 



Post: #60
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
No one gives a damn about this false narrative that mankind causes climate change. It is a natural occurance. Happened throughout history
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication