News
news The Mystery of the Belmez Faces
news NASA to test ‘space lasers’ with latest launch
news Satellite Images Of Strange Lost City in the South Pacific
news Do Aliens Come From Under the Oceans?
news Bizarre Paranormal Mysteries of World War I
news Human brains and bodies could be hacked to create life in hostile environments
news Nuke fallout alert as Russian radioactive leak sweeps across Europe
news Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
news Government Files and the Abominable Snowman
news Mind-Controlled Drone Swarms Could Soon Put More Eyes in the Sky
news How America’s National Parks Became Hotbeds of Paranormal Activity



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 36 Vote(s) - 1.56 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397455
11-14-2017 09:04 AM

 



Post: #841
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
Advertisement
Fcats only -

Pollution - bad

CO2 - Good

Warming=Lie

Ice Age Is Here.
Quote this message in a reply

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-14-2017 09:32 AM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #842
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 02:34 AM)

The ozone hole is at its smallest size since 1988, thanks to hot air and a massive international effort


One of the layers of atmosphere that protects all life on our planet is the width of two pennies, and hangs out six to ten miles above the Earth's in an environment that human activity made extremely hostile. Every year when winter ends and warmer weather returns to Antarctica, chemicals that we put into the air rip a hole in the layer. But this year, that hole is smaller than usual.

Quote:Alarmed by the effect that human actions were having on the planet, nations around the world signed the Montreal Protocol just a few years later, agreeing to ban CFC's and other ozone-depleting chemicals. The agreement went into effect in 1989; but with CFC's long lifetime, it wasn't until very recently that researchers—who were constantly monitoring the health of the ozone layer—were able to truly notice signs of healing.

Last year also had a smaller ozone hole than previous years, a dramatic decrease from the 2006 peak when the [gap reached record widths and depths. But despite the last few years of good ozone conditions, there's still a long time to go before it returns to pre-1980 levels. A recent study found that the ozone hole was unlikely to recover to that extent before 2070.

Still, the fact that it is recovering—even if it's recovering more slowly than we'd like—is notable. scientists who worked on the initial discovery of the ozone hole are thrilled that the recommendations they made 30 years ago are now showing environmental dividends. Trying to ban a valuable and useful class of chemicals was a daunting task, but with concerted effort on the part of politicians, policy makers, industries, and scientists, that decision is now paying off.

more:
http://www.popsci.com.au/science/the-ozo...ort,476989


Quote:A considerable investment in recycling occurred in the 1970s, due to rising energy costs. Recycling aluminum uses only 5% of the energy required by virgin production; glass, paper and other metals have less dramatic but very significant energy savings when recycled feedstock is used.

Although consumer electronics such as the television have been popular since the 1920s, recycling of them was almost unheard of until early 1991. The first electronic waste recycling scheme was implemented in Switzerland, beginning with collection of old refrigerators but gradually expanding to cover all devices. After these schemes were set up, many countries did not have the capacity to deal with the sheer quantity of e-waste they generated or its hazardous nature. They began to export the problem to developing countries without enforced environmental legislation. This is cheaper, as recycling computer monitors in the United States costs 10 times more than in China. Demand in Asia for electronic waste began to grow when scrap yards found that they could extract valuable substances such as copper, silver, iron, silicon, nickel, and gold, during the recycling process. The 2000s saw a large increase in both the sale of electronic devices and their growth as a waste stream: in 2002, e-waste grew faster than any other type of waste in the EU. This caused investment in modern, automated facilities to cope with the influx of redundant appliances, especially after strict laws were implemented in 2003.

As of 2014, the European Union has about 50% of world share of the waste and recycling industries, with over 60,000 companies employing 500,000 persons, with a turnover of €24 billion. Countries have to reach recycling rates of at least 50%, while the lead countries are around 65% and the EU average is 39% as of 2013

more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycling#History

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 03:16 AM)
[Image: 74gLZaY3?format=jpg&name=600x314]
[Image: DOjazB-X4AEogsZ.jpg]

Quote:Emissions from fossil fuels and industrial uses are projected to grow 2 percent this year, reaching 41 billion tons by the end of 2017, according to the report presented at the United Nations’ climate summit in Bonn, Germany. The increase was predicted to continue in 2018.

Total greenhouse gas emissions remained level, at about 36 billion tons per year from 2014 to 2016, even as the global economy grew, which suggested carbon dioxide emissions had crested with the rise of renewable electricity sources and improved fuel efficiency standards. But emissions from fossil fuels will hit 37 billion tons this year, a report from the Global Carbon Project finds. The report draws from three papers in the journals Nature Climate Change, Environmental Research Letters and Earth System Science Data Discussions.

more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/f...648a0ca1f0

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 03:29 AM)
[Image: DOf9W-NVwAAIY20.jpg]

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 431446
11-14-2017 09:45 AM

 



Post: #843
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 09:32 AM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 02:34 AM)

The ozone hole is at its smallest size since 1988, thanks to hot air and a massive international effort


One of the layers of atmosphere that protects all life on our planet is the width of two pennies, and hangs out six to ten miles above the Earth's in an environment that human activity made extremely hostile. Every year when winter ends and warmer weather returns to Antarctica, chemicals that we put into the air rip a hole in the layer. But this year, that hole is smaller than usual.


more:
http://www.popsci.com.au/science/the-ozo...ort,476989



more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycling#History

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 03:16 AM)
[img=500x400]https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/929961281271898114/74gLZaY3?format=jpg&name=600x314
[img=500x400]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOjazB-X4AEogsZ.jpg


more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/f...648a0ca1f0

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 03:29 AM)
link to image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOf9W-NVwAAIY20.jpg


Deliberately conflating pollution and climate alarmism.

You tripped over your man boobs again, AC

chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-14-2017 10:05 AM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #844
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 09:45 AM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 09:32 AM)


Deliberately conflating pollution and climate alarmism.


chuckle

that is what you see maybe..
I see how a planet I used to live on banded together dealt with and mitigated human caused environmental damage that science knew was out of control at the time.

It even seemed like we managed to avoid your projected globalist scientific research fuelled socialist takeover of the world while tackling ozone depletion and recycling problems.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 431446
11-14-2017 10:40 AM

 



Post: #845
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 10:05 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 09:45 AM)
Deliberately conflating pollution and climate alarmism.


chuckle

that is what you see maybe..
I see how a planet I used to live on banded together dealt with and mitigated human caused environmental damage that science knew was out of control at the time.

It even seemed like we managed to avoid your projected globalist scientific research fuelled socialist takeover of the world while tackling ozone depletion and recycling problems.

But you're telling yet another lie when you conflate pollution with the CO2 lie.

What are my 'projected globalist scientific research fuelled socialist takeover of the world while tackling ozone depletion and recycling problems.'
?

You've lost the plot.

Is it because you can't find a copy/paste an answer to my post?

chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397455
11-14-2017 11:07 AM

 



Post: #846
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 09:32 AM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 02:34 AM)

The ozone hole is at its smallest size since 1988, thanks to hot air and a massive international effort


One of the layers of atmosphere that protects all life on our planet is the width of two pennies, and hangs out six to ten miles above the Earth's in an environment that human activity made extremely hostile. Every year when winter ends and warmer weather returns to Antarctica, chemicals that we put into the air rip a hole in the layer. But this year, that hole is smaller than usual.


more:
http://www.popsci.com.au/science/the-ozo...ort,476989



more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycling#History

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 03:16 AM)
[img=500x400]https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/929961281271898114/74gLZaY3?format=jpg&name=600x314
[img=500x400]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOjazB-X4AEogsZ.jpg


more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/f...648a0ca1f0

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 03:29 AM)
link to image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOf9W-NVwAAIY20.jpg

A million copy pasta Youtube and B.S., Is this a FE thread in disguise?

You know it's all B.S. because they use the same tactics.

Pretty lies and fear-mongering claptrap.
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-14-2017 11:47 AM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #847
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 10:40 AM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 10:05 AM)
that is what you see maybe..
I see how a planet I used to live on banded together dealt with and mitigated human caused environmental damage that science knew was out of control at the time.

It even seemed like we managed to avoid your projected globalist scientific research fuelled socialist takeover of the world while tackling ozone depletion and recycling problems.



You've lost the plot.

Is it because you can't find a copy/paste an answer to my post?

chuckle

Well I really didn't expect you to understand any of that ,sunshine.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 431446
11-14-2017 11:51 AM

 



Post: #848
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 11:47 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 10:40 AM)
You've lost the plot.

Is it because you can't find a copy/paste an answer to my post?

chuckle

Well I really didn't expect you to understand any of that ,sunshine.

No you didn't.

chuckle

You don't get away with that tripe with me.
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-14-2017 11:54 AM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #849
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
[Image: giphy.gif]
chuckle

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2017 11:54 AM by spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 431446
11-14-2017 12:10 PM

 



Post: #850
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-14-2017 11:54 AM)
[img=500x400]https://media.giphy.com/media/Jb9J6KVpKb0hW/giphy.gif
chuckle

facepalm


Read it tomorrow, sunshine...when the fog clears

chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
Lord DunLOP
Registered User
User ID: 339892
11-14-2017 02:51 PM

Posts: 234



Post: #851
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
At the north pole, Arctic sea ice reached a record low wintertime maximum extent on March 7, 2017. At the south pole, sea ice around Antarctica hit its lowest extent ever recorded by satellites at the end of summer in the Southern Hemisphere on March 3. The combined Arctic and Antarctic sea ice numbers were at their lowest point since satellites began to continuously measure sea ice in 1979 – the equivalent of having lost a chunk of sea ice larger than Mexico.

Minimum Ice Extent reached Sep 13, 2017 two days earlier than usual. The yellow line depicts the average minimum ice extent over the last 30 years. The Arctic Ice reflects 75% of the sun's energy back into space, the open ocean absorbs 90% of the sun's energy. This seasonal ice loss event is an automated ever strengthening positive feedback loop with negative connotations for life on Earth. It's not up for debate, the Arctic is thawing!

[Image: SeaIceMin2017_withAveExtent_1920x1080_1024x576.jpg]

Bump

PERFECT? Far from, but like my Lord and Savior, I am, a left-leaning-liberal. Amen
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2017 03:38 PM by Lord DunLOP.) Quote this message in a reply
Lord DunLOP
Registered User
User ID: 339892
11-14-2017 05:52 PM

Posts: 234



Post: #852
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
AGW has claimed another victim,"The ghost of capn´crunch" was a staple in these environmental type treads and had taken up the mantel of the canary in the coalmine. Unfortunately the stress was more than he could bare and he ended it. The Captain's gone but not forgotten.

[Image: 7QyQAG6.png]

Tissue

PERFECT? Far from, but like my Lord and Savior, I am, a left-leaning-liberal. Amen
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-14-2017 05:57 PM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #853
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
From the Everglades in the US to the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, climate change is destroying the many of the greatest wonders of the natural world.

A new report on Monday from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) reveals that the number of natural world heritage sites being damaged and at risk from global warming has almost doubled to 62 in the past three years.

Those at high risk include iconic places from the Galapagos Islands to the central Amazon and less well known but equally vibrant and unique sites such as the karst caves of Hungary and Slovakia and the monarch butterfly reserves in Mexico.

Coral reefs are particularly badly affected by rising ocean temperatures, from the Seychelles to Belize, where the northern hemisphere’s biggest reef is situated. Global heating is also causing mountain glaciers to rapidly shrink, from Kilimanjaro in Tanzania to the Rocky Mountains in Canada and the Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch – home to the largest Alpine glacier.

Other ecosystems being damaged are wetlands, such as the Everglades, where sea level is rising as the ocean warms and salt water is intruding. In the Sundarbans mangrove forest on the delta of the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna rivers on the Bay of Bengal, two islands have already been submerged and a dozen more are threatened. Fiercer storms are also increasing the risk of devastation.

Rising numbers of wildfires are damaging the beautiful Fynbos flowerscapes in the Cape region of South Africa and the Monarch butterfly site in Mexico. Elsewhere, warming is melting the permafrost in the newly declared Qinghai Hoh Xil heritage site, which is at 4,500m altitude in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
Australia is especially exposed as it has 10 natural heritage sites where climate change damage is rated as high or very high risk, from its Gondwana rainforests to Shark Bay in western Australia and islands such as Fraser and Macquarie.

more:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/...ld-wonders

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-15-2017 02:16 AM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #854
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
[Image: DOoZgkVW0AE-66x.jpg]

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
Vocem sine nomine audivit!
User ID: 350320
11-18-2017 04:28 PM

Posts: 35,522



Post: #855
RE: AGW forced Climate Change is not up for debate.
[Image: DO3TDHwUEAA2Yb_.jpg]

[Image: ugKHqGP.jpg]
©®℮å†E
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication