News
news The Unexplained Mystery Boom Phenomenon Continues Worldwide
news Scientists fear end to Mankind not 'decades away' but 'much sooner'
news Whitley Strieber reflects on his career
news 12-Year-Old Builds Fusion Reactor in His Family's Playroom
news Scientists build 'self-aware' robot able to repair itself
news Startup Plans to Send Pregnant Woman into Space to Give Birth
news Retailers sell out of macaroni and cheese with a 20-year shelf life
news Hunt for the Blackstar: On the Trail of the Military’s Secret 'Mothership'
news TV Series ‘Project Blue Book’ Is Based on a True UFO Story. Here It Is.
news The Mysterious Butterfly People of Missouri
news Drug to clear 'zombie cells' from body could be first anti-aging treatment


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
NancyLuna
Registered User
User ID: 469063
10-21-2018 03:20 PM

Posts: 21



Post: #1
furious Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
Advertisement
A fallacy is the use of invalid and unreasonable facts, that most people use during an argument to defeat their opponents. All fallacious people use personal attacks and illogical facts to deceive other people, they are always afraid to accept the truth. We encounter these people every day.

https://www.hankermag.com/invalid-argume...fallacies/

Jptdknpa
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 441673
10-21-2018 03:39 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
7 posts
7 threads
All cite the same source.

Ttpcmasm
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 468928
10-21-2018 03:44 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
NPC is the newest. chuckle
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 469054
10-21-2018 04:01 PM

 



Post: #4
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
The OP is amazingly valid anywhere. My favorite is #8. That's just science for Hitler.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 441673
10-21-2018 04:13 PM

 



Post: #5
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-21-2018 03:39 PM)
7 posts
6 threads
All cite the same source.

Ttpcmasm
Correction:
OP did reply on one thread. Hiding My mistake.
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
10-21-2018 04:20 PM

Posts: 21,466



Post: #6
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
NancyLuna  Wrote: (10-21-2018 03:20 PM)
A fallacy is the use of invalid and unreasonable facts, that most people use during an argument to defeat their opponents. All fallacious people use personal attacks and illogical facts to deceive other people, they are always afraid to accept the truth. We encounter these people every day.

https://www.hankermag.com/invalid-argume...fallacies/

Jptdknpa

nice !
a slightly longer list

The Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation: Misrepresentation by Argument

The following is The Ethical Skeptic’s list, useful in spotting both formal and informal logical fallacies, cognitive biases, statistical broaches and styles of crooked thinking on the part of those in the Social Skepticism movement. It is categorized by employment groupings so that it can function as a context appropriate resource in a critical review of an essay, imperious diatribe or publication by a thought enforcing Social Skeptic. To assist this, we have comprised the list inside an intuitive taxonomy of ten contextual categories of mischaracterization/misrepresentation:

Opponents, Locution or Semantics, Evidence or Data, Bias or Method, Science, Argument, Assumption, Groups, Self and Authority

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2009/09/24...-argument/
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
11-08-2018 05:11 PM

Posts: 21,466



Post: #7
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
[Image: 980x.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
11-08-2018 05:51 PM

Posts: 21,466



Post: #8
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
He says this tendency towards disagreement is structurally built into the online experience because in disagreeing, people tend to have much more to say than if they just expressed that they agreed. Interestingly, Graham points out that, even though it might feel like it if you spend much time in comment sections, the world is not necessarily getting angrier. But it could if we don’t observe a certain restraint in how we disagree. To disagree better, which will lead to better conversations and happier outcomes, Graham came up with these seven levels of a disagreement hierarchy (DH):
DH0. Name-calling
DH1. Ad hominem
DH3. Contradiction
DH4. Counterargument
DH5. Refutation
DH6. Refuting the Central Point.

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
Quote this message in a reply
Manosteel
explorer of the multiverse
User ID: 472580
11-08-2018 05:53 PM

Posts: 2,356



Post: #9
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-08-2018 05:51 PM)
He says this tendency towards disagreement is structurally built into the online experience because in disagreeing, people tend to have much more to say than if they just expressed that they agreed. Interestingly, Graham points out that, even though it might feel like it if you spend much time in comment sections, the world is not necessarily getting angrier. But it could if we don’t observe a certain restraint in how we disagree. To disagree better, which will lead to better conversations and happier outcomes, Graham came up with these seven levels of a disagreement hierarchy (DH):
DH0. Name-calling
DH1. Ad hominem
DH3. Contradiction
DH4. Counterargument
DH5. Refutation
DH6. Refuting the Central Point.

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html

chuckle

you do all of those things all the time

"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery"...Thomas Jefferson

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it"...Thomas Jefferson


[Image: 295r6sn.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 450686
11-08-2018 05:57 PM

 



Post: #10
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
Manosteel  Wrote: (11-08-2018 05:53 PM)
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-08-2018 05:51 PM)
He says this tendency towards disagreement is structurally built into the online experience because in disagreeing, people tend to have much more to say than if they just expressed that they agreed. Interestingly, Graham points out that, even though it might feel like it if you spend much time in comment sections, the world is not necessarily getting angrier. But it could if we don’t observe a certain restraint in how we disagree. To disagree better, which will lead to better conversations and happier outcomes, Graham came up with these seven levels of a disagreement hierarchy (DH):
DH0. Name-calling
DH1. Ad hominem
DH3. Contradiction
DH4. Counterargument
DH5. Refutation
DH6. Refuting the Central Point.

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html

chuckle

you do all of those things all the time

IKR, he sure projects a lot.

Lmao
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 472585
11-08-2018 06:16 PM

 



Post: #11
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
Another He Man sock......jesus.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 472377
11-08-2018 06:21 PM

 



Post: #12
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
I don't give a damn.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 453934
11-08-2018 06:25 PM

 



Post: #13
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
Logical Fallacies like

NO COLLUSION

WE DIDN'T COLLUDE

COLLUSION IS NOT ILLEGAL

THERE WAS NO COLLUSION

FAKE NEWS
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
11-09-2018 01:45 AM

Posts: 21,466



Post: #14
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (10-21-2018 04:20 PM)
NancyLuna  Wrote: (10-21-2018 03:20 PM)
A fallacy is the use of invalid and unreasonable facts, that most people use during an argument to defeat their opponents. All fallacious people use personal attacks and illogical facts to deceive other people, they are always afraid to accept the truth. We encounter these people every day.

https://www.hankermag.com/invalid-argume...fallacies/

Jptdknpa

nice !
a slightly longer list

The Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation: Misrepresentation by Argument

The following is The Ethical Skeptic’s list, useful in spotting both formal and informal logical fallacies, cognitive biases, statistical broaches and styles of crooked thinking on the part of those in the Social Skepticism movement. It is categorized by employment groupings so that it can function as a context appropriate resource in a critical review of an essay, imperious diatribe or publication by a thought enforcing Social Skeptic. To assist this, we have comprised the list inside an intuitive taxonomy of ten contextual categories of mischaracterization/misrepresentation:

Opponents, Locution or Semantics, Evidence or Data, Bias or Method, Science, Argument, Assumption, Groups, Self and Authority

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2009/09/24...-argument/

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-08-2018 05:11 PM)
[Image: 980x.jpg]

spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ  Wrote: (11-08-2018 05:51 PM)
He says this tendency towards disagreement is structurally built into the online experience because in disagreeing, people tend to have much more to say than if they just expressed that they agreed. Interestingly, Graham points out that, even though it might feel like it if you spend much time in comment sections, the world is not necessarily getting angrier. But it could if we don’t observe a certain restraint in how we disagree. To disagree better, which will lead to better conversations and happier outcomes, Graham came up with these seven levels of a disagreement hierarchy (DH):
DH0. Name-calling
DH1. Ad hominem
DH3. Contradiction
DH4. Counterargument
DH5. Refutation
DH6. Refuting the Central Point.

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
Quote this message in a reply
spɹɐʍoɔ snoɯʎuouɐ
☇☇Vocem sine nomine audivit!☇☇
User ID: 350320
11-09-2018 03:14 AM

Posts: 21,466



Post: #15
RE: Logical Fallacies That Dumb People Use To Win Arguments, And How To Spot Them
Bump
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication