News
news The world as we know it is about to end
news Witnesses See 40 UFOs Over a Beach in the UK
news Mysterious and Chilling Photographs of Unidentified People
news Canada's Best-Documented UFO Encounter Celebrates Its 50th
news California Broadcast Interrupted With Ominous Announcement
news Mystery of sonic weapon attacks at US embassy in Cuba deepens
news Is the US Navy Trying to Catch UFOs?
news No, We Can't Control Hurricanes from Space
news This Guy Has Been Tirelessly Documenting the Ghost in His Apartment
news Earth May Be Under Surveillance by Nine Alien Civilizations
news CIA informant claimed Hitler survived WWII



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 311894
03-20-2017 04:14 AM

 



Post: #1
stars Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
Advertisement
Search warrants to access a suspect's search history aren't uncommon. Search warrants to access metadata from an entire cell tower are becoming more and more popular, too. What isn't common though, is a search warrant for the internet history of an entire town. While this sounds like something from the "what not to do" chapter in a law textbook, it is happening right now in the town of Edina, Minnesota.

A thief faxed in a fake passport to a credit union which allowed him to steal $28,500 out of a victim's bank account. Police were notified of the fraudulent transfer and discovered that the photo used on the passport could be accessed by searching Google Images for the victim's name. It doesn't show up in Yahoo or Bing searches, so police are hoping to use Google to help track down their thief.

The county judge agreed with the police and granted the warrant, which was then served to Google. The warrant, if Google agrees to provide the information, allows the police to collect names, emails, account information, and IP addresses of anyone who searched for the victim's name during a five-week period.


http://www.techspot.com/news/68568-minne...story.html

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 409321
03-20-2017 04:16 AM

 



Post: #2
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
It always gets worse... There's nothing to defend left..
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411288
03-20-2017 04:55 AM

 



Post: #3
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
You don't think searching for a specific name is rather specific? They're not looking at the entire towns internet search history they're searching for a specific piece of information.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403475
03-20-2017 07:22 AM

 



Post: #4
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
Edina is a wealthy suburb in the second ring surrounding MSP. Not surprising, given the wealth of most of its residents.
House of M
M Theory Cubed
User ID: 403438
03-20-2017 07:28 AM

Posts: 13,336



Post: #5
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:22 AM)
Edina is a wealthy suburb in the second ring surrounding MSP. Not surprising, given the wealth of most of its residents.

Oh my!!

chuckle

Holy Mackerel Catman!


House of M
M Theory Cubed
User ID: 403438
03-20-2017 07:32 AM

Posts: 13,336



Post: #6
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
My town is a bit of a 'dark horse' if you catch my drift.

http://www.darkhorse.com/

chuckle

Holy Mackerel Catman!


LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 391807
03-20-2017 07:33 AM

 



Post: #7
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
42 U.S.C. § 1983, commonly referred to as "section 1983" provides:

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.Hiding
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 391807
03-20-2017 07:34 AM

 



Post: #8
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:33 AM)
42 U.S.C. § 1983, commonly referred to as "section 1983" provides:

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.Hiding

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly ...Lmao
House of M
M Theory Cubed
User ID: 403438
03-20-2017 07:35 AM

Posts: 13,336



Post: #9
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
House of M  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:32 AM)
My town is a bit of a 'dark horse' if you catch my drift.

http://www.darkhorse.com/

chuckle


Take my search history, please!!

chuckle

Holy Mackerel Catman!


JimmyJohn
Registered User
User ID: 323501
03-20-2017 07:37 AM

Posts: 681



Post: #10
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
This is insane!

Our judges are not following our laws!
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403475
03-20-2017 07:38 AM

 



Post: #11
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:33 AM)
42 U.S.C. § 1983, commonly referred to as "section 1983" provides:

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.Hiding

That section is mostly used by prison inmates and government employees. If tried, it's a pretty long haul to get justice.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 398561
03-20-2017 07:40 AM

 



Post: #12
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
If judges always had this much power they should be shot for not using it before now?
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 391807
03-20-2017 07:42 AM

 



Post: #13
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:38 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:33 AM)
42 U.S.C. § 1983, commonly referred to as "section 1983" provides:

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.Hiding

That section is mostly used by prison inmates and government employees. If tried, it's a pretty long haul to get justice.

Unless someone does the unspeakable.....Srjceahd
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403475
03-20-2017 07:44 AM

 



Post: #14
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
Here, read this. http://www.virginialawreview.org/sites/v...s_Book.pdf

I'm to tired to go find my book on deprivation of liberty. Like I said, it is a very long road. Asking for internet search information is not even close to malicious prosecution. If anything, the people who have their records seized have standing. This code centers on due process. Simply asking for records that already exist and are extensively used and likely sold by internet providers (think targeting advertising) is not likely to meet the high standard for a due process claim under 1983.

Depriving inmates of psychotropic medications legally prescribed by licensed medical providers for years before incarceration is more like it. Find something less petty to sue over under 1983.
PENDULUM
Registered User
User ID: 383624
03-20-2017 07:44 AM

Posts: 4,274



Post: #15
RE: Minnesota judge grants warrant for a whole town's search history
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:40 AM)
If judges always had this much power they should be shot for not using it before now?

Yeah...kinda like some entities have been using our justice system like a video game control....One of the problems having lawyers in politics poses...
Advertisement










Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication