News
news This Secret Catholic Exorcist Cult in Brazil Is Making a Deal With the Devil
news Roswell conspiracy theory: Expert claims UFO crash did happen
news A second sun dubbed 'Nemesis' once inhabited the Solar System, say scientists.
news China in quantum breakthrough
news Italian soil yields a new antibiotic that can fight drug-resistant bacteria
news More than 460 earthquakes recorded so far in Yellowstone Park swarm
news Jupiter Now Has 69 Moons
news The Very Weird Vanishing and Death of Don Kemp
news The Human Brain Can Create Structures in Up to 11 Dimensions
news A New Bermuda Triangle Opens Off the Coast of China
news 'Liquid light' can bend around objects



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 398270
03-20-2017 07:03 PM

 



Post: #1
Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Advertisement
Bill would ban protesters from using face masks

http://bismarcktribune.com/news/local/go...269dd.html
Quote this message in a reply

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411401
03-20-2017 07:12 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Yeah, that kind of defeats the purpose of having spent millions of your tax payer dollars of facial recognition hardware, software, and databases. Have you all lost your minds? Why would you do that and then hide your face?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 398270
03-20-2017 07:18 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates.
Quote this message in a reply
Tolimar
Planet size EGO!
User ID: 410492
03-20-2017 07:48 PM

Posts: 7,751



Post: #4
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Not very smart, if true. Protesters will always defy all laws.

7102
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411375
03-20-2017 07:53 PM

 



Post: #5
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Only "antifa" pussies and black bloc wear masks at protests. And guess what? Those are the only assholes that burn, loot, and break sh*t. Helluva bill. Rubber stamp that sh*t.
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
03-20-2017 07:56 PM

Posts: 47,316



Post: #6
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:12 PM)
Yeah, that kind of defeats the purpose of having spent millions of your tax payer dollars of facial recognition hardware, software, and databases. Have you all lost your minds? Why would you do that and then hide your face?

Jptdknpa

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
http://taxwallstreetparty.org/
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411401
03-20-2017 07:56 PM

 



Post: #7
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
LOL burka clad angry mooslims are not going to like this. Gjdqppsn
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411401
03-20-2017 08:06 PM

 



Post: #8
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:56 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:12 PM)
Yeah, that kind of defeats the purpose of having spent millions of your tax payer dollars of facial recognition hardware, software, and databases. Have you all lost your minds? Why would you do that and then hide your face?

Jptdknpa

I can't sell the American tax payers facial recognition systems if you are all allowed to cover up your faces. I wanted them to also outlaw facial cosmetics too but when I saw the potential consequences of that action, well.. I had to change my mind. (my sympathy to some of you females out there, lol) So, while you can't put a plastic mask over your face, you terrorist looking dudes out there are still allowed to paint a fake face onto yourselves. And you don't even have to hide the fact that you have a penis, because some chick's with fake faces have those now too.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 388129
03-20-2017 08:24 PM

 



Post: #9
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:53 PM)
Only "antifa" pussies and black bloc wear masks at protests. And guess what? Those are the only assholes that burn, loot, and break sh*t. Helluva bill. Rubber stamp that sh*t.

That is the whole point of groups like antifa.
To get the gov to crack down on everyone.
How else are they going to get their "revolution"?

That said I am pretty OK with this crackdown.


First they came for antifa's masks and I said nothing because I'm not a commie hipster pu$$y...
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411173
03-20-2017 08:25 PM

 



Post: #10
banana RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Good.

One step from banning the niqab in public places.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 411423
03-20-2017 08:34 PM

 



Post: #11
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
But the police can still wear gas masks? Special powers...
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397173
03-20-2017 08:53 PM

 



Post: #12
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:12 PM)
Yeah, that kind of defeats the purpose of having spent millions of your tax payer dollars of facial recognition hardware, software, and databases. Have you all lost your minds? Why would you do that and then hide your face?

This type of comment is usually spewed by Spiddy.

But you are obviously NOT Spiddy because Spiddy's
brain is limited to two or less broken sentences.

But just the fact that you use the same tactics;
re., trying to make the Right look like hypocrites
by intimating that they are now, somehow, in
league with the police state.

The ONLY protestors hiding their faces are those
who are rioting, looting, assaulting, and defacing
property.

Last time I checked, Free Speech does NOT include
ANY of the above...and Free Speech does not require
anonymity.

Most people who are TRULY protesting are PROUD to
show their face, and HAPPY to gain media exposure.

That is why REAL protestors do NOT hide their faces,
and hold their protests during the DAY. The people
protesting AT NIGHT (who cover their fece faces),
are looking to riot, loot, steal, assault, and deface
the property of citizens.

But beyond that...

Masks are irrelevant as far as big, inner cities are
concerned, as most metropolis police cars have
been fitted with IR cameras for at least a decade.

Make-up, sunglasses, and face shields are all
clearly defeated with Infra Red technologies...

The question is, WHY haven't these technologies
ALREADY been used to identify illegal rioters?

Better yet...WILL these technologies be used to
identify BLM and SOROS THUGS in their protests
planned for March 20 through May 1st (May Day)?
Quote this message in a reply
Radar O'Really
Registered User
User ID: 134850
03-20-2017 08:54 PM

Posts: 5,702



Post: #13
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
the united police states of amerika

the country is an open-air gulag

If you're paranoid, remember - you're not the sicko, the sickos are those watching you.
Quote this message in a reply
Radar O'Really
Registered User
User ID: 134850
03-20-2017 08:55 PM

Posts: 5,702



Post: #14
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 08:53 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 07:12 PM)
Yeah, that kind of defeats the purpose of having spent millions of your tax payer dollars of facial recognition hardware, software, and databases. Have you all lost your minds? Why would you do that and then hide your face?

This type of comment is usually spewed by Spiddy.

But you are obviously NOT Spiddy because Spiddy's
brain is limited to two or less broken sentences.

But just the fact that you use the same tactics;
re., trying to make the Right look like hypocrites
by intimating that they are now, somehow, in
league with the police state.

The ONLY protestors hiding their faces are those
who are rioting, looting, assaulting, and defacing
property.

Last time I checked, Free Speech does NOT include
ANY of the above...and Free Speech does not require
anonymity.


Most people who are TRULY protesting are PROUD to
show their face, and HAPPY to gain media exposure.

That is why REAL protestors do NOT hide their faces,
and hold their protests during the DAY. The people
protesting AT NIGHT (who cover their fece faces),
are looking to riot, loot, steal, assault, and deface
the property of citizens.

But beyond that...

Masks are irrelevant as far as big, inner cities are
concerned, as most metropolis police cars have
been fitted with IR cameras for at least a decade.

Make-up, sunglasses, and face shields are all
clearly defeated with Infra Red technologies...

The question is, WHY haven't these technologies
ALREADY been used to identify illegal rioters?

Better yet...WILL these technologies be used to
identify BLM and SOROS THUGS in their protests
planned for March 20 through May 1st (May Day)?

yes it does

you even posted anonymously

Dumbass

If you're paranoid, remember - you're not the sicko, the sickos are those watching you.
(This post was last modified: 03-20-2017 08:56 PM by Radar O'Really.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397519
03-20-2017 09:16 PM

 



Post: #15
RE: Bill would ban protesters from using face masks
Radar OReally  Wrote: (03-20-2017 08:55 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (03-20-2017 08:53 PM)
This type of comment is usually spewed by Spiddy.

But you are obviously NOT Spiddy because Spiddy's
brain is limited to two or less broken sentences.

But just the fact that you use the same tactics;
re., trying to make the Right look like hypocrites
by intimating that they are now, somehow, in
league with the police state.

The ONLY protestors hiding their faces are those
who are rioting, looting, assaulting, and defacing
property.

Last time I checked, Free Speech does NOT include
ANY of the above...and Free Speech does not require
anonymity.


Most people who are TRULY protesting are PROUD to
show their face, and HAPPY to gain media exposure.

That is why REAL protestors do NOT hide their faces,
and hold their protests during the DAY. The people
protesting AT NIGHT (who cover their fece faces),
are looking to riot, loot, steal, assault, and deface
the property of citizens.

But beyond that...

Masks are irrelevant as far as big, inner cities are
concerned, as most metropolis police cars have
been fitted with IR cameras for at least a decade.

Make-up, sunglasses, and face shields are all
clearly defeated with Infra Red technologies...

The question is, WHY haven't these technologies
ALREADY been used to identify illegal rioters?

Better yet...WILL these technologies be used to
identify BLM and SOROS THUGS in their protests
planned for March 20 through May 1st (May Day)?

yes it does

you even posted anonymously

Dumbass

Just because I post without a blue name does
not mean I am anonymous. Only a bonafide
[email protected] thinks they are anonymous here...

...or practically ANYWHERE.

Are you one of the ignorant, who claim
that TRUMP was not "wire tapped"?

CLAPPER was proven a perjurer when the NSA
admitted to gathering and STORING meta-data
ON ALL U.S. citizens.


Anonymity is NOT required for the use of Free Speech.

The SECOND AMENDMENT secures that RIGHT.

It is NOT secured by the cowardice of SOROS' paid RIOTERS,
seeking to remain anonymous while they commit CRIMES
under their false banner of "peaceful protests".

So GFY, Radar.
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication