News
news The great thaw of America's north is coming
news 3 Weird Impacts From Storm Ophelia Explained
news A Look Back at the McMinnville UFO Photos
news Chinese Space Station to Crash to Earth Soon
news An Eerie Anniversary: October 1987
news Shadow People On The Loose
news A mysterious hole nearly the size of South Carolina has opened in Antarctica's ice
news A Case for Time Travelers
news Floating Wind Farms in the North Atlantic Could Power the World
news UFO' spotted over Yellowstone volcano?
news Is A.I. Going Too Far?



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 15 Vote(s) - 2.47 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 377186
04-21-2017 05:13 PM

 



Post: #121
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
Advertisement
April 20
Russian think tank planned to influence
the U.S. election, new documents reveal


A Russian government-controlled think tank had outlined plans on
how to swing the 2016 U.S. election toward Donald Trump, according
to a Reuters report Thursday. New documents reveal a strategy of
using social media to bolster Mr. Trump and undermine faith in America’s
electoral system. William Brangham learns more from former CIA officer
John Sipher and Ned Parker of Reuters.


listen to audio
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/russian-t...ts-reveal/
Quote this message in a reply

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 05:23 PM

 



Post: #122
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 05:13 PM)
April 20
Russian think tank planned to influence
the U.S. election, new documents reveal


A Russian government-controlled think tank had outlined plans on
how to swing the 2016 U.S. election toward Donald Trump, according
to a Reuters report Thursday. New documents reveal a strategy of
using social media to bolster Mr. Trump and undermine faith in America’s
electoral system. William Brangham learns more from former CIA officer
John Sipher and Ned Parker of Reuters.


listen to audio
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/russian-t...ts-reveal/

That is nothing but a re-hash of the reuter's article which has zero credibility. Stop accepting "sources say". That's just straight out propaganda.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 05:25 PM

 



Post: #123
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 05:13 PM)
April 20
Russian think tank planned to influence
the U.S. election, new documents reveal


A Russian government-controlled think tank had outlined plans on
how to swing the 2016 U.S. election toward Donald Trump, according
to a Reuters report Thursday. New documents reveal a strategy of
using social media to bolster Mr. Trump and undermine faith in America’s
electoral system. William Brangham learns more from former CIA officer
John Sipher and Ned Parker of Reuters.


listen to audio
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/russian-t...ts-reveal/

Keep in mind that when you see a gov't source saying ANYTHING they are no longer bound by law to tell the truth! They can lie!!!!! Obama and Congress did that when they killed the Smith–Mundt Act by passing the NDAA of 2013. If they don't show the documents they CAN NOT BE TRUSTED!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 377186
04-21-2017 05:45 PM

 



Post: #124
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
BULLSHIIITE

Declassified report says Putin ‘ordered’ effort
to undermine faith in U.S. election and help Trump

By Greg Miller and Adam Entous
January 6

Russia carried out a comprehensive cyber campaign to sabotage the U.S. presidential election, an operation that was ordered by Russian President Vladi­mir Putin and ultimately sought to help elect Donald Trump, U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in a remarkably blunt assessment released Friday.

The report depicts Russian interference as unprecedented in scale, saying that Moscow’s role represented “a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort” beyond previous election-related espionage.

The campaign initially sought to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, “denigrate” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and damage her expected presidency. But in time, Russia “developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump” and repeatedly sought to artificially boost his election chances.

The report released to the public is an abbreviated version of a highly classified multiagency assessment requested by President Obama. Even so, it amounts to an extraordinary postmortem of a Russian assault on a pillar of American democracy.

The 14-page document made public also serves as an explicit rebuttal to Trump’s repeated assertions that U.S. spy agencies cannot determine who was responsible for a hacking operation that extracted thousands of emails from Democratic Party computer networks and dumped them into public view via the WikiLeaks website.

U.S. intelligence agencies released a declassified version of their report on Russian intervention in the 2016 U.S. election on Jan. 6, just hours after President-elect Donald Trump was briefed by American officials. (Video: Peter Stevenson: The Washington Post/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

In the report, the CIA, FBI and Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded with “high confidence” that Russian intelligence services penetrated numerous computer systems tied to U.S. political parties and then “relayed” the email troves to WikiLeaks.

Trump emerged from a briefing by the nation’s top intelligence officials on the contents of the report acknowledging at least the possibility that Russia was behind election-related hacks. But he offered no indication that he was prepared to accept their conclusions that Moscow sought to help him win.

Instead, Trump said in a statement that while Russia, China and other countries and groups may have sought to breach Democratic and Republican computer systems, “there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election.”

The report did not address that issue. It was presented to Trump by officials including Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., CIA Director John Brennan and FBI Director James B. Comey.

Trump also said that “there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.” That appeared to be consistent with the findings of the report, although it noted that Russia “obtained and maintained access” to numerous election systems that “were not involved in vote tallying.”

A footnote on the document said that the conclusions contained in the declassified draft were “identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.”


Obama commissioned the report shortly after the Nov. 8 election, and recently ordered a series of retaliatory measures including new economic sanctions, the expulsion of dozens of suspected Russian intelligence operatives from the United States and the closure of two Russian-owned compounds in the country.

Washington Post reporter Adam Entous breaks down Friday’s intelligence report on Russian involvement in the 2016 election. (Dalton Bennett/The Washington Post)

The report was met with mixed reactions from senior lawmakers. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, described the Russian activities cited in the report as “a troubling chapter in an ongoing story, and I expect that our nation’s leaders will counter these activities appropriately.”

His counterpart in the House, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), used the report to criticize Obama, saying that the House Intelligence Committee “has been warning the Obama administration for years about the need for stronger measures against Russia . . . but our warnings largely fell on deaf ears.”

The public version of the report does not explicitly mention some of the most sensitive pieces of intelligence that helped analysts reach their conclusions. U.S. officials have said that spy agencies identified certain “actors” involved in the cyber offensive, believe Russia was far more focused on penetrating and exploiting Democratic systems, and intercepted communications making clear that top Russian officials congratulated themselves on Trump’s win.

One of the report’s key judgments is that “Putin and the Russian government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”

Moscow did so in part because it “developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump,” who as a candidate repeatedly praised Putin and advocated policies in Syria and Europe strongly favored by the Kremlin.

But the report also attributed Russia’s efforts to Putin’s hostility toward Clinton, a former senator and secretary of state whom he blamed for inciting mass protests against his government in 2011 and 2012.

Overall, the report describes a multipronged campaign that involved not only hacking, but overt propaganda on Russian-controlled news platforms and the extensive use of social media and even “trolls” to amplify voter discord in the United States and encourage opposition to Clinton.

Despite those exertions, Russia appears to have concluded that a Clinton victory was inevitable right up until election night. As a result, Moscow focused on finding ways to undercut Clinton’s legitimacy if she won.

One of the more colorful notes in the report describes how “pro-Kremlin bloggers had prepared a Twitter campaign, #DemocracyRIP, on election night,” then had to shelve it when Trump won.

The document traces interference efforts that began with inconspicuous probes of U.S. electoral systems in early 2014, carried through the election, and may still be underway.

Russian intelligence agencies first gained access to Democratic National Committee networks in July 2015, the report says. Russia’s miliary intelligence service, known as the GRU, “probably” expanded its efforts in March 2016, going after the email accounts of Democratic Party officials and other political figures.

By May, the GRU had stolen what the report describes as “large volumes of data from the DNC.” In the ensuing months, chunks of that trove began to appear on websites including WikiLeaks, generating a steady stream of headlines that embarrassed Democrats and kept voter attention on Clinton’s email controversy.

Putin has repeatedly denied that Russia was responsible for the hacked emails. In an interview with the New York Times on Friday, Trump called the sustained focus on the issue a “political witch hunt.”

The intelligence assessment also drew the most direct line to date between Putin’s desire to aid Trump’s campaign and Russia’s policies and objectives in Syria and Ukraine. In both cases, it said, Putin “indicated a preference for President-elect Trump’s stated policy to work with Russia, and pro-Kremlin figures spoke highly about what they saw as his Russia-friendly positions” in those two countries.

Putin is also eager for relief from economic sanctions imposed on Russia for its support of separatist forces in Ukraine and its annexation of Crimea.
.....

read more at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...d7642fc17b
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 05:48 PM

 



Post: #125
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 05:45 PM)
BULLSHIIITE

Declassified report says Putin ‘ordered’ effort
to undermine faith in U.S. election and help Trump

By Greg Miller and Adam Entous
January 6

Russia carried out a comprehensive cyber campaign to sabotage the U.S. presidential election, an operation that was ordered by Russian President Vladi­mir Putin and ultimately sought to help elect Donald Trump, U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in a remarkably blunt assessment released Friday.

The report depicts Russian interference as unprecedented in scale, saying that Moscow’s role represented “a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort” beyond previous election-related espionage.

The campaign initially sought to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, “denigrate” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and damage her expected presidency. But in time, Russia “developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump” and repeatedly sought to artificially boost his election chances.

The report released to the public is an abbreviated version of a highly classified multiagency assessment requested by President Obama. Even so, it amounts to an extraordinary postmortem of a Russian assault on a pillar of American democracy.

The 14-page document made public also serves as an explicit rebuttal to Trump’s repeated assertions that U.S. spy agencies cannot determine who was responsible for a hacking operation that extracted thousands of emails from Democratic Party computer networks and dumped them into public view via the WikiLeaks website.

U.S. intelligence agencies released a declassified version of their report on Russian intervention in the 2016 U.S. election on Jan. 6, just hours after President-elect Donald Trump was briefed by American officials. (Video: Peter Stevenson: The Washington Post/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

In the report, the CIA, FBI and Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded with “high confidence” that Russian intelligence services penetrated numerous computer systems tied to U.S. political parties and then “relayed” the email troves to WikiLeaks.

Trump emerged from a briefing by the nation’s top intelligence officials on the contents of the report acknowledging at least the possibility that Russia was behind election-related hacks. But he offered no indication that he was prepared to accept their conclusions that Moscow sought to help him win.

Instead, Trump said in a statement that while Russia, China and other countries and groups may have sought to breach Democratic and Republican computer systems, “there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election.”

The report did not address that issue. It was presented to Trump by officials including Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., CIA Director John Brennan and FBI Director James B. Comey.

Trump also said that “there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.” That appeared to be consistent with the findings of the report, although it noted that Russia “obtained and maintained access” to numerous election systems that “were not involved in vote tallying.”

A footnote on the document said that the conclusions contained in the declassified draft were “identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.”


Obama commissioned the report shortly after the Nov. 8 election, and recently ordered a series of retaliatory measures including new economic sanctions, the expulsion of dozens of suspected Russian intelligence operatives from the United States and the closure of two Russian-owned compounds in the country.

Washington Post reporter Adam Entous breaks down Friday’s intelligence report on Russian involvement in the 2016 election. (Dalton Bennett/The Washington Post)

The report was met with mixed reactions from senior lawmakers. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, described the Russian activities cited in the report as “a troubling chapter in an ongoing story, and I expect that our nation’s leaders will counter these activities appropriately.”

His counterpart in the House, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), used the report to criticize Obama, saying that the House Intelligence Committee “has been warning the Obama administration for years about the need for stronger measures against Russia . . . but our warnings largely fell on deaf ears.”

The public version of the report does not explicitly mention some of the most sensitive pieces of intelligence that helped analysts reach their conclusions. U.S. officials have said that spy agencies identified certain “actors” involved in the cyber offensive, believe Russia was far more focused on penetrating and exploiting Democratic systems, and intercepted communications making clear that top Russian officials congratulated themselves on Trump’s win.

One of the report’s key judgments is that “Putin and the Russian government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”

Moscow did so in part because it “developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump,” who as a candidate repeatedly praised Putin and advocated policies in Syria and Europe strongly favored by the Kremlin.

But the report also attributed Russia’s efforts to Putin’s hostility toward Clinton, a former senator and secretary of state whom he blamed for inciting mass protests against his government in 2011 and 2012.

Overall, the report describes a multipronged campaign that involved not only hacking, but overt propaganda on Russian-controlled news platforms and the extensive use of social media and even “trolls” to amplify voter discord in the United States and encourage opposition to Clinton.

Despite those exertions, Russia appears to have concluded that a Clinton victory was inevitable right up until election night. As a result, Moscow focused on finding ways to undercut Clinton’s legitimacy if she won.

One of the more colorful notes in the report describes how “pro-Kremlin bloggers had prepared a Twitter campaign, #DemocracyRIP, on election night,” then had to shelve it when Trump won.

The document traces interference efforts that began with inconspicuous probes of U.S. electoral systems in early 2014, carried through the election, and may still be underway.

Russian intelligence agencies first gained access to Democratic National Committee networks in July 2015, the report says. Russia’s miliary intelligence service, known as the GRU, “probably” expanded its efforts in March 2016, going after the email accounts of Democratic Party officials and other political figures.

By May, the GRU had stolen what the report describes as “large volumes of data from the DNC.” In the ensuing months, chunks of that trove began to appear on websites including WikiLeaks, generating a steady stream of headlines that embarrassed Democrats and kept voter attention on Clinton’s email controversy.

Putin has repeatedly denied that Russia was responsible for the hacked emails. In an interview with the New York Times on Friday, Trump called the sustained focus on the issue a “political witch hunt.”

The intelligence assessment also drew the most direct line to date between Putin’s desire to aid Trump’s campaign and Russia’s policies and objectives in Syria and Ukraine. In both cases, it said, Putin “indicated a preference for President-elect Trump’s stated policy to work with Russia, and pro-Kremlin figures spoke highly about what they saw as his Russia-friendly positions” in those two countries.

Putin is also eager for relief from economic sanctions imposed on Russia for its support of separatist forces in Ukraine and its annexation of Crimea.
.....

read more at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...d7642fc17b

It's just a circle jerk. They are lying.

Again, they have NO LEGAL REQUIREMENT TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH!!!!!!

STOP BELIEVING THEIR STATEMENTS WITHOUT PROOF!!!!!!!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 377186
04-21-2017 05:58 PM

 



Post: #126
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
Vladamir Putin ‘ordered’ the effort to undermine faith
in U.S. election system. He ordered the Hacking.

Candiate Trump did the exact same thing. And Trump
benefitted from Russian hacking and Russian Propaganda.
PERIOD!


The questions:
1 - did he do it as a PARTNER in the Crime of the century?
or
2 - as a clueless DUPE who was tricked by Putin?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 06:00 PM

 



Post: #127
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 05:45 PM)
BULLSHIIITE

Declassified report says Putin ‘ordered’ effort
to undermine faith in U.S. election and help Trump

By Greg Miller and Adam Entous
January 6

Russia carried out a comprehensive cyber campaign to sabotage the U.S. presidential election, an operation that was ordered by Russian President Vladi­mir Putin and ultimately sought to help elect Donald Trump, U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in a remarkably blunt assessment released Friday.


.....

read more at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...d7642fc17b

Not sure if this will link:
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/po...tion/2153/

That's a link to the specific report from the 3 agencies claiming this BS (FBI, CIA, NSA). Look at page 7 for the assessment level. FBI and CIA say high confidence, but NSA only says moderate confidence.

Now, if you are at all aware of the wikileaks CIA 7 dump and the Snowden documents and the repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act; you should begin to understand that those agencies are completely without credibly.

If in fact the Russians had done anything like breaking into systems within the US, the NSA would know for a fact. Thanks to Snowden we know they have EVERYTHING! Them saying moderate confidence, when they are the ones that would know for sure, means something.

The other 2 agencies, are just lying. The FBI has no operational capabilities to detect anything Russia would be doing without using CIA and NSA. CIA, we now know from the 7 dump, has a specific programs made to mask their hacking with false identifications (to make it look like Russian or Iran or North Korea).

Stop believing the lies.
Quote this message in a reply
Particle Man
Registered User
User ID: 412623
04-21-2017 06:20 PM

Posts: 515



Post: #128
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
This is all fake news.

The report was released a long time back, and it has ABSOLUTELY ZERO FACTS OR EVIDENCE in it.

This is just a rehash of the exact same OBAMA propaganda that the OBAMA CONTROLLED CIA, led by ex-communist Muslim leftwing lunatic JOHN BRENNAN has been pushing as the FAKE NEWS excuse to launch an attack against the incoming republican administration.

The real story is the way the agencies of our government have been coopted for use as political propaganda tools by Barack Obama (which aligns completely with the theories of Saul Alinsky...the mastermind behind Chicago communist community organizing that produced Obama).

The 'report' is just a bunch of baseless allegations ....

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

You can read it there.

***

And does it take a f*cking Spy Agency to come up this - The Russians are using Twitter to spread their views?


Big f*cking deal, you brainless propagandized idiots.
Lmonkey
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 377186
04-21-2017 07:34 PM

 



Post: #129
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 05:58 PM)
Vladamir Putin ‘ordered’ the effort to undermine faith
in U.S. election system. He ordered the Hacking.

Candiate Trump did the exact same thing. And Trump
benefitted from Russian hacking and Russian Propaganda.
PERIOD!


The questions:
1 - did he do it as a PARTNER in the Crime of the century?
or
2 - as a clueless DUPE who was tricked by Putin?

Trump either colluded with the Russians

or he benefitted from Russian Propaganda
because he was thier DUPE (el stupido)
PERIOD!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 08:06 PM

 



Post: #130
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 07:34 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 05:58 PM)
Vladamir Putin ‘ordered’ the effort to undermine faith
in U.S. election system. He ordered the Hacking.

Candiate Trump did the exact same thing. And Trump
benefitted from Russian hacking and Russian Propaganda.
PERIOD!


The questions:
1 - did he do it as a PARTNER in the Crime of the century?
or
2 - as a clueless DUPE who was tricked by Putin?

Trump either colluded with the Russians

or he benefitted from Russian Propaganda
because he was thier DUPE (el stupido)
PERIOD!

Neither of your contentions are true. For it to be true there had to be a significant amount of so-called Russian propaganda that somehow magically eclipsed all of the MSM. That propaganda simply doesn't exist, otherwise you would be able plainly point to it.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 377186
04-21-2017 08:53 PM

 



Post: #131
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
17 Intelligence Agencies
CONCLUDED THAT
Russia was behind hacking


and you know it
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 10:18 PM

 



Post: #132
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 08:53 PM)
17 Intelligence Agencies
CONCLUDED THAT
Russia was behind hacking


and you know it

You just insist on being misled by those agencies:
"What Clinton said was false and misleading. First of all, only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies. And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks

. . . are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow — the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europa and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

Saying we think the hacks “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” is far short of saying we have evidence that Russia has been responsible for the hacks. Maybe high-level officials would have authorized them if Russian hackers were responsible, but the DNI and DHS statement did NOT say there was evidence Russia was responsible."

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2...m-e-mails/

As I already pointed out to you, the gov't has no legal requirement to tell you the truth. For this reason, if they want to make wild claims such as "Russian hacked the election", it is incumbent upon them to prove their evidence if they want the credibility. So far, THEY HAVE NOT DONE SO!!!
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 377186
04-21-2017 11:00 PM

 



Post: #133
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
I know better than to trust LIEbertarians, TeaPEEople or conspiracy
kooks who actually believe the horse crap that comes from Trump,
Ron 'legalize heroin' Paul or Alex Jones.

The Intel Agencies are right about Trump and he will most likely be
IMPEACHED and or IMPRISIONED because he is a CRIMINAL.

The entire Trump Presidency is an International Criminal Conspiracy
and an ACT OF WAR waged on America.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 403858
04-21-2017 11:37 PM

 



Post: #134
RE: BREAKING: a RUSSIAN Think Tank drew up plans to sway 2016 U.S. election
LoP Guest  Wrote: (04-21-2017 11:00 PM)
I know better than to trust LIEbertarians, TeaPEEople or conspiracy
kooks who actually believe the horse crap that comes from Trump,
Ron 'legalize heroin' Paul or Alex Jones.

The Intel Agencies are right about Trump and he will most likely be
IMPEACHED and or IMPRISIONED because he is a CRIMINAL.

The entire Trump Presidency is an International Criminal Conspiracy
and an ACT OF WAR waged on America.

They aren't right. They have no legal obligation to tell the truth. They are about as right on Trump as they were on Assad using chemical weapons - which is to say completely f*cking wrong:

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-...e-rat-line
Quote this message in a reply








Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication