News
news The Mystery of the Belmez Faces
news NASA to test ‘space lasers’ with latest launch
news Satellite Images Of Strange Lost City in the South Pacific
news Do Aliens Come From Under the Oceans?
news Bizarre Paranormal Mysteries of World War I
news Human brains and bodies could be hacked to create life in hostile environments
news Nuke fallout alert as Russian radioactive leak sweeps across Europe
news Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
news Government Files and the Abominable Snowman
news Mind-Controlled Drone Swarms Could Soon Put More Eyes in the Sky
news How America’s National Parks Became Hotbeds of Paranormal Activity



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 434473
11-15-2017 12:41 AM

 



Post: #31
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Advertisement
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 10:39 PM)
Natura Naturans  Wrote: (11-13-2017 09:50 PM)
They should put this thread in the Religious sub forum where true believers in the flat Earth Bible fight it out. The only reason these scientists or any others question the age of dinosaurs is their Religious beliefs. To anyone else: who cares?

Jhikpghf

Get this creationist B.S. off this forum.

Sumerian King's list clearly indicates a much longer history than the 3500-6,000 years you creationists believe. The pyramid alignments indicate a time far prior to your fairy tale timelines.

In fact, many, many civilizations trace their history far longer than you claim the Earth has existed.

Mayans, Aztecs, even the Chinese have records dating 10,000+ years.

And, they weren't the first. They came upon the abandoned ancient sites and used them.

Nope. Natura hit the nail on the head. Scientists who reject Creationism in the face of evidence are religious fanatics.

Study of our Universe suggests there was a single date of creation: The Big Bang. Scientists have desperately searched for a way to debunk proof of the Big Bang because they don't like a date of creation. Except there is no evidence otherwise except crackpot theories.

Study of the human genome suggests we originated from a single man and a single woman. Before we studied our genome scientists thought there would be multiple "Adams" and multiple "Eves" as according to evolution the first homo sapiens would have been inter-breeding with the last of homo erectus. There would have been multiple tribes, many ancestors. Except evidence suggests there is not.

Study of dinosaur fossils shows soft tissue and much earlier dates of origin than the commonly accepted multi billion-year timescale for the evolution of life on Earth. Scientists reject this outright because it's the final nail in the coffin of evolution.

Darwin was an idiot and will soon be tossed into the trashbin of history, along with all the other crackpots who inhibited the development of man by distracting us from the truth.

The truth cannot be contained, only temporarily suppressed by those who want to control us by feeding us a pack of lies.
Quote this message in a reply

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 405758
11-15-2017 12:46 AM

 



Post: #32
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:08 PM)
though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports.

Supplying reports on bone samples, stating they were millions of years old,,,,,,,,,,,but didn't know they were Dinosaur bones ??????????? Dumbass
Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 12:46 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #33
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol



Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 02:30 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #34
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Natura Naturans  Wrote: (11-13-2017 09:50 PM)
Theoferrum  Wrote: (11-13-2017 09:29 PM)
Well, genius, tell that to the evolutionists and, further, genius, if it was stone there would not be any carbon signature at all so, I guess you better go back to school...

They should put this thread in the Religious sub forum where true believers in the flat Earth Bible fight it out. The only reason these scientists or any others question the age of dinosaurs is their Religious beliefs. To anyone else: who cares?

Nope - the reason we question the evolutionist age of the dinosaurs is because we know its foundation is based on circular reasoning - they arbitrarily assigned million year dates for the various strata and then concocted dating methods calibrated by the predetermined dates they had assigned to the strata - this is not science nor fact it is guess work pure and simple. As stated by the Smithsonian to myself in a letter dated June 96 , "All manmade dating methods are subject to error due to heat and leaching" both of which were present in large quantities during the global flood - but, you are right - evolutionary comments should be put in the religious section cause you people worship Darwin as a science god even though he was scientifically illiterate...

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:34 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 02:34 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #35
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
AnnRamon7  Wrote: (11-13-2017 09:57 PM)
BumpLoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:28 PM)
How much carbon could there actually be in Plaster of Paris?

Bump

They carbon dated the Piltdown 'Man'?

Evolutionary Hoaxes :




Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
Quote this message in a reply
Angry Bird
Yeah, I freakin bite....
User ID: 396138
11-15-2017 02:38 AM

Posts: 36,198



Post: #36
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
No just how are you going to radio carbon date dinosaur bones anyways?

All tissue, including the bone is replaced with soil that is around it.

What you basically have is basically a rock that is in the shape of the bone that was buried there.

Not an actual bone.

[Image: tYQsa4A.gif]
Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 02:39 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #37
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 09:59 PM)
Arguing over the age of dinosaur fossils all because of some story book people that like lol Jptdknpa

Yup - Origin of Species is pretty fantastical alright...

Famous Scientists who rejected Darwin :





Check out the video description for more info...

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:36 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Crankgorilla
Lightly salted
User ID: 408974
11-15-2017 02:46 AM

Posts: 2,879



Post: #38
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
I don't fully understand all of this. It is interesting and goes into carbon dating and its flaws. Again, I'm not saying this is true or not, how could I know really? But he's going out on a limb, that's for sure.



Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:03 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #39
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 10:39 PM)
Sumerian King's list clearly indicates a much longer history than the 3500-6,000 years you creationists believe. The pyramid alignments indicate a time far prior to your fairy tale timelines.

In fact, many, many civilizations trace their history far longer than you claim the Earth has existed.

Mayans, Aztecs, even the Chinese have records dating 10,000+ years.

And, they weren't the first. They came upon the abandoned ancient sites and used them.
You are using the Sumerian list to argue your point? Seriously? So, what, you believe it when they said one of their kings reigned 28,800 years?

At least the ages presented in the Bible have some support from Science - Benjamin Button children age slowly and are expected to live up to four hundred years or more.

The Chinese records only go back to about 3 thousand years BC genius - the date you chose is based on neolithic dating by the evolutionists which is already suspect. Some historian then claimed creation occurred 36000 years before that offering no evidence and he wrote those words in 230 AD whereas P.J. Wiseman, "Ancient Records and the Structure of Genesis" proved Genesis is composed of eyewitness accounts which I can date through internal evidence, an Egyptian Creation Cosmology and Interactive Astronomy of a Super Conjunction in Gemini to 4182 BC.

The Mayans themselves date creation to 3114 BC - OOPS :

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_creation

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:37 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:11 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #40
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Crankgorilla  Wrote: (11-15-2017 02:46 AM)
I don't fully understand all of this. It is interesting and goes into carbon dating and its flaws. Again, I'm not saying this is true or not, how could I know really? But he's going out on a limb, that's for sure.




Doesn't matter - it is accurate up to 5000 years and material inside the pyramid (protected from heat and leaching) was dated 2500 BC (same as the dinosaur fossils) which is in agreement with their Kings List and destroys the supposed 10,000 BC Shaft alignments which shafts I have conclusively shown date to the same approximate time and record the 23* Pole Shift circa 3500 BC.




Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:44 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:13 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #41
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Theoferrum  Wrote: (11-15-2017 03:03 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 10:39 PM)
Sumerian King's list clearly indicates a much longer history than the 3500-6,000 years you creationists believe. The pyramid alignments indicate a time far prior to your fairy tale timelines.

In fact, many, many civilizations trace their history far longer than you claim the Earth has existed.

Mayans, Aztecs, even the Chinese have records dating 10,000+ years.

And, they weren't the first. They came upon the abandoned ancient sites and used them.
You are using the Sumerian list to argue your point? Seriously? So, what, you believe it when they said one of their kings reigned 28,800 years?

At least the ages presented in the Bible have some support from Science - Benjamin Button children age slowly and are expected to live up to four hundred years or more.

The Chinese records only go back to about 3 thousand years BC genius - the date you chose is based on neolithic dating by the evolutionists which is already suspect. Some historian then claimed creation occurred 36000 years before that offering no evidence and he wrote those words in 230 AD whereas P.J. Wiseman, "Ancient Records and the Structure of Genesis" proved Genesis is composed of eyewitness accounts which I can date through internal evidence, an Egyptian Creation Cosmology and Interactive Astronomy of a Super Conjunction in Gemini to 4182 BC.

The Mayans themselves date creation to 3114 BC - OOPS :

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_creation

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:15 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #42
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
moe  Wrote: (11-13-2017 10:41 PM)
Jesus burried dino bones 4000 years ago to test us
LmaoLmao

Nope - he destroyed them with a flood, genius - that is why all fossil evidence we have was made through the medium of water...

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:24 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #43
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Angry Bird  Wrote: (11-15-2017 02:38 AM)
No just how are you going to radio carbon date dinosaur bones anyways?

All tissue, including the bone is replaced with soil that is around it.

What you basically have is basically a rock that is in the shape of the bone that was buried there.

Not an actual bone.

Then why do they yield a 4000 BC carbon date? And please don't tell me - as one of your kind did - that it isn't a fossil its just a bone.

A bone from a species that has been extinct for millions of years...

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:51 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:27 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #44
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-15-2017 12:46 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:08 PM)
though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports.

Supplying reports on bone samples, stating they were millions of years old,,,,,,,,,,,but didn't know they were Dinosaur bones ??????????? Dumbass

He was not told they were dinosaur bones nor the 'age' - it was a blind set of tests of dinosaur fossils which still had soft tissue in them and they dated them to about 2-4 thousand BC...

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:28 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 430125
11-15-2017 03:39 AM

Posts: 1,252



Post: #45
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
The global flood occurred 2516 BC. The flood waters increased the size of the earth to twice as large - this also decreased the atmosphere to half that and doubled gravity - thus birds that can't fly now but could then which is something neither Evolutionists or Creationists could explain - same thing with massive Dino's...




Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:51 AM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication