News
news The Mystery of the Belmez Faces
news NASA to test ‘space lasers’ with latest launch
news Satellite Images Of Strange Lost City in the South Pacific
news Do Aliens Come From Under the Oceans?
news Bizarre Paranormal Mysteries of World War I
news Human brains and bodies could be hacked to create life in hostile environments
news Nuke fallout alert as Russian radioactive leak sweeps across Europe
news Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
news Government Files and the Abominable Snowman
news Mind-Controlled Drone Swarms Could Soon Put More Eyes in the Sky
news How America’s National Parks Became Hotbeds of Paranormal Activity



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428170
11-13-2017 07:06 PM

 



Post: #1
deal They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Advertisement
http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html

"I have recently become aware of the work that you and your team have been conducting with respect to radiocarbon dating of bone. The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution. Consequently, we are no longer able to provide radiocarbon services in support of your anti-scientific agenda. I have instructed the Radiocarbon Laboratory to return your recent samples to you and to not accept any future samples for analysis."

Lmao
Quote this message in a reply

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428170
11-13-2017 07:08 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon-14 testing. He directed the pretreatment and processing of the dinosaur bone samples with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports. Carbon dating at this facility is certainly the very best.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 428170
11-13-2017 07:08 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Lmao
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 368318
11-13-2017 07:28 PM

 



Post: #4
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
How much carbon could there actually be in Plaster of Paris?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 432348
11-13-2017 07:31 PM

 



Post: #5
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Didn't somebody discover dinosaur flesh a few years ago.

Dinosaurs are millions of years old my ass Jptdknpa
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 400638
11-13-2017 07:32 PM

 



Post: #6
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
DinosaursJptdknpa
Quote this message in a reply
MarkLong
Registered User
User ID: 232453
11-13-2017 07:32 PM

Posts: 73



Post: #7
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:06 PM)
http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html

"I have recently become aware of the work that you and your team have been conducting with respect to radiocarbon dating of bone. The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution. Consequently, we are no longer able to provide radiocarbon services in support of your anti-scientific agenda. I have instructed the Radiocarbon Laboratory to return your recent samples to you and to not accept any future samples for analysis."

Lmao

they dated dino in ice at 4000 years, million of years is bullshit
Quote this message in a reply
Natura Naturans
Registered User
User ID: 412048
11-13-2017 07:52 PM

Posts: 10,461



Post: #8
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Radio carbon dating is only good to about 5,000 years. If you submit a sample farther back in time it will show a worthless number. You may think that because it came back at 4,000 years that means it really is 4,000 years, but that is simply a delusion. You need to research the subject before you go claiming something just because you BELIEVE it.

“The highest activity a human being can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand is to be free.” --Baruch Spinoza
Quote this message in a reply
Chrysophylax
Registered User
User ID: 436515
11-13-2017 08:03 PM

Posts: 1,841



Post: #9
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:31 PM)
Didn't somebody discover dinosaur flesh a few years ago.

Dinosaurs are millions of years old my ass Jptdknpa

No.

The "flesh" was fossilized flesh, still rock. When you hear of fossilized blood or soft tissue, it refers to rocks that replaced those features.

The ONE incident in which a researcher claimed to have "spongy soft tissue" turned out to be fake, nothing more than a chicken McNugget that got thrown in the fossil bag. I speak to the scientists involved sometimes, and neither of them are with the Creationist crowd on this: it was a chicken nugget.

People forget the use of humor once it becomes useful.

http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/johnrkingiv
Http://www.johnrkingiv.com
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 432348
11-13-2017 08:06 PM

 



Post: #10
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Chrysophylax  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:03 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:31 PM)
Didn't somebody discover dinosaur flesh a few years ago.

Dinosaurs are millions of years old my ass Jptdknpa

No.

The "flesh" was fossilized flesh, still rock. When you hear of fossilized blood or soft tissue, it refers to rocks that replaced those features.

The ONE incident in which a researcher claimed to have "spongy soft tissue" turned out to be fake, nothing more than a chicken McNugget that got thrown in the fossil bag. I speak to the scientists involved sometimes, and neither of them are with the Creationist crowd on this: it was a chicken nugget.

At least provide a link to snopes where you got this BS from Lmao
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 436066
11-13-2017 08:07 PM

 



Post: #11
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Natura Naturans  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:52 PM)
Radio carbon dating is only good to about 5,000 years. If you submit a sample farther back in time it will show a worthless number. You may think that because it came back at 4,000 years that means it really is 4,000 years, but that is simply a delusion. You need to research the subject before you go claiming something just because you BELIEVE it.

So what are you trying to say that the earth didn't exist more than 5000 years ago.
Quote this message in a reply
Chrysophylax
Registered User
User ID: 436515
11-13-2017 08:26 PM

Posts: 1,841



Post: #12
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:06 PM)
Chrysophylax  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:03 PM)
No.

The "flesh" was fossilized flesh, still rock. When you hear of fossilized blood or soft tissue, it refers to rocks that replaced those features.

The ONE incident in which a researcher claimed to have "spongy soft tissue" turned out to be fake, nothing more than a chicken McNugget that got thrown in the fossil bag. I speak to the scientists involved sometimes, and neither of them are with the Creationist crowd on this: it was a chicken nugget.

At least provide a link to snopes where you got this BS from Lmao

Actually I get this from the scientists who made the claims in the first place. Paleontology is not a huge field.

People forget the use of humor once it becomes useful.

http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/johnrkingiv
Http://www.johnrkingiv.com
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 432348
11-13-2017 08:32 PM

 



Post: #13
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Chrysophylax  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:26 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:06 PM)
At least provide a link to snopes where you got this BS from Lmao

Actually I get this from the scientists who made the claims in the first place. Paleontology is not a huge field.

BS, clearly you are a shill working for McDonalds Corp. trying to sell more Chicken McNuggets.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 175778
11-13-2017 08:49 PM

 



Post: #14
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
Chrysophylax  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:26 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 08:06 PM)
At least provide a link to snopes where you got this BS from Lmao

Actually I get this from the scientists who made the claims in the first place. Paleontology is not a huge field.





the woman herself
Quote this message in a reply
Theoferrum
Registered User
User ID: 436623
11-13-2017 09:26 PM

Posts: 1,313



Post: #15
RE: They refuse to carbon date dinosaur bones - lol
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-13-2017 07:31 PM)
Didn't somebody discover dinosaur flesh a few years ago.

Dinosaurs are millions of years old my ass Jptdknpa

As is also proven by the, supposed, 300 million year old living fossil shark they just caught...

Welcome to My World...

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com
(This post was last modified: 11-13-2017 09:30 PM by Theoferrum.) Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication