News
news The Mystery of the Belmez Faces
news NASA to test ‘space lasers’ with latest launch
news Satellite Images Of Strange Lost City in the South Pacific
news Do Aliens Come From Under the Oceans?
news Bizarre Paranormal Mysteries of World War I
news Human brains and bodies could be hacked to create life in hostile environments
news Nuke fallout alert as Russian radioactive leak sweeps across Europe
news Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
news Government Files and the Abominable Snowman
news Mind-Controlled Drone Swarms Could Soon Put More Eyes in the Sky
news How America’s National Parks Became Hotbeds of Paranormal Activity



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 2.86 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 424051
11-14-2017 04:01 PM

 



Post: #46
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
Advertisement
The numbers are misleading in that South Korea military when reserves are included balloons to 3.7 million, all of which I'm sure would be pressed into action. Secondly the greater and more modern technology in weaponry to include air superiority serves as a multiplier for the South.

It would be a blood bath.
Quote this message in a reply

Hamburgerwagon
Proud Lunatic
User ID: 249781
11-14-2017 04:41 PM

Posts: 7,935



Post: #47
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
How would NK even enter without crossing the DMZ full of 1 million landmines?

Also, that is a 2.5 mile kill zone to take them out as they try to cross. The whole army would be hamburger meat.

Remember the highway of death in Kuwait?

Remember, I am playing a character who is based on me.
Quote this message in a reply
Heir
Registered User
User ID: 397213
11-14-2017 05:28 PM

Posts: 5,613



Post: #48
gmorning RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
A Nuclear Strike on NK , even if just for ( over hyped ) EMP Effect would be counter productive to continued peaceful international relations .


The Pentagon’s New Super Weapon Is Basically A Weaponized Meteor Strike

By JARED KELLER on June 7, 2017

http://taskandpurpose.com/kinetic-bombar...-weaponry/


The Air Force's 'rods from god' could hit with the force of a nuclear weapon — with no fallout

Blake Stilwell, We Are The Mighty
Nov. 9, 2017, 10:13 AM 776,046

http://www.businessinsider.com/air-force...rce-2017-9


Rods from God

Space-launched darts that strike like meteors
By Eric Adams June 1, 2004

This technology is very far out--in miles and years. A pair of satellites orbiting several hundred miles above the Earth would serve as a weapons system. One functions as the targeting and communications platform while the other carries numerous tungsten rods--up to 20 feet in length and a foot in diameter--that it can drop on targets with less than 15 minutes' notice. When instructed from the ground, the targeting satellite commands its partner to drop one of its darts. The guided rods enter the atmosphere, protected by a thermal coating, traveling at 36,000 feet per second--comparable to the speed of a meteor. The result: complete devastation of the target, even if it's buried deep underground. (The two-platform configuration permits the weapon to be "reloaded" by just launching a new set of rods, rather than replacing the entire system.)

The concept of kinetic-energy weapons has been around ever since the RAND Corporation proposed placing rods on the tips of ICBMs in the 1950s; the satellite twist was popularized by sci-fi writer Jerry Pournelle. Though the Pentagon won't say how far along the research is, or even confirm that any efforts are underway, the concept persists. The "U.S. Air Force Transformation Flight Plan," published by the Air Force in November 2003, references "hypervelocity rod bundles" in its outline of future space-based weapons, and in 2002, another report from RAND, "Space Weapons, Earth Wars," dedicated entire sections to the technology's usefulness.

https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-06/rods-god

Replacement 4 Local Link DELETED : The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom

See : The Legacy On Archives Org
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 436700
11-14-2017 05:31 PM

 



Post: #49
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 07:53 AM)
look into the fitness of DPRK military

average weight is 88 lbs

they are starving

they know kung fu
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 303934
11-14-2017 05:52 PM

 



Post: #50
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 08:42 AM)
Crankgorilla  Wrote: (11-14-2017 08:22 AM)
So were the Vietnamese. Asians in sandals eating rice and cats with a couple of AK-47's raped your War Machine.

BOOM^

So very true. In fact, America hasn't won a war since Russia won WW2.. Lmao


Paper tiger America.

This.

Boomers have never won a war, ever.

War against drugs, nope.
War against crime, nope.
War against poverty, nope.
War against extremism, nope.

War(s) in the Middle East, nope.
War(s) in oil country, nope.
Cyber wars, nope, nope and nope.

Now this administration wants to get us into wars involving trade, currency and Asian territories?

Congrats, trumpeters. You played yourself.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 303934
11-14-2017 05:54 PM

 



Post: #51
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
Hamburgerwagon  Wrote: (11-14-2017 04:41 PM)
How would NK even enter without crossing the DMZ full of 1 million landmines?

Also, that is a 2.5 mile kill zone to take them out as they try to cross. The whole army would be hamburger meat.

Remember the highway of death in Kuwait?

You're obviously missing the point NK has biological weapons and the ability to launch them over land mines.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 409988
11-14-2017 06:05 PM

 



Post: #52
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
Black [email protected]  Wrote: (11-14-2017 07:03 AM)
American troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea's 1.2million soldiers, warns top commander

North Korea has 1.2million troops ready to fight compared to 28,000 US soldiers in the region and South Korea's 490,000 service personnel
If war broke out it could take months for reinforcements to arrive and leave American forces badly outnumbered, potentially leading to defeat
Warning issued by former US commander in Korea in a letter to politicians
Comes as three US carrier groups conduct drills in the region

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...=applenews

SooOOooon


doomed

China has the largest standing Army in the world.

Now what do you think about this Miracle during Trumps visit into secrecy never before seen?

Now watch India. Popcorn
Quote this message in a reply
Adytum
Anti-Antifa
User ID: 415416
11-14-2017 06:20 PM

Posts: 12,503



Post: #53
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
BlackHat, I find your lack of faith disturbing.

Seriously, what's up with the defeatism?

Seems like a new thing.

Is this what the kids are up to now?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 436709
11-14-2017 07:01 PM

 



Post: #54
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
Black [email protected]  Wrote: (11-14-2017 07:03 AM)
American troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea's 1.2million soldiers, warns top commander

North Korea has 1.2million troops ready to fight compared to 28,000 US soldiers in the region and South Korea's 490,000 service personnel
If war broke out it could take months for reinforcements to arrive and leave American forces badly outnumbered, potentially leading to defeat
Warning issued by former US commander in Korea in a letter to politicians
Comes as three US carrier groups conduct drills in the region

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...=applenews

SooOOooon


doomed

That's why you bomb the sh*t out of them first before you send in any troops. If it looks like they're making a run for the DMZ to attack South Korea...then a few MOAB would do nicely. Tactical nuke as last resort because of radiation, and fallout. If he sets off a nuke then it's game on. Every one of his missile facilities will be destroyed. I hope the fallout heads towards China. That fat little sh*t dictator Kim will destroy himself and his people if he keeps up the bullshit. Hell, his people are already starving, and his military is made up of slaves.
Quote this message in a reply
1110.00
Manifest Alchemy
User ID: 198896
11-14-2017 07:07 PM

Posts: 15,932



Post: #55
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
Doesn't EU have a new secret army, paid for with missing trillions?

"The Precipitant has a smaller place in reality, thus it is mortal."
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8uMCQrAxylM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0619bdpOolA
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397180
11-14-2017 07:10 PM

 



Post: #56
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 05:52 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 08:42 AM)
BOOM^

So very true. In fact, America hasn't won a war since Russia won WW2.. Lmao


Paper tiger America.

This.

Boomers have never won a war, ever.

War against drugs, nope.
War against crime, nope.
War against poverty, nope.
War against extremism, nope.

War(s) in the Middle East, nope.
War(s) in oil country, nope.
Cyber wars, nope, nope and nope.

Now this administration wants to get us into wars involving trade, currency and Asian territories?

Congrats, trumpeters. You played yourself.

This. We're still embroiled in a war in Iraq and Afghanistan. We can't win a war against ragheads living in the desert armed with improvised bombs and obsolete weaponry from WW2. How are we to take on an army with more than 1 million troops?

I've said it before. A ground war in Korea is the absolute worst case scenario. It would be more horrific than nuclear war.

Best case: Assassinate the kim family.
Plan B: Nuke north korea
sh*t hits the fan: North korea invades south korea
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 397180
11-14-2017 07:14 PM

 



Post: #57
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
If you don't think kim has invasion plans ready you're an imbecile.

He has hundreds of artillery pointed at Seoul. He probably has tunnels or plans to dig tunnels under the DMZ, bypassing the mines and bombs that would hit his troops on their way in.

That's not counting any secret weapons he has. He probably has lots of short range missiles that we don't know about. He might have splinter cells in Seoul ready to attack infrastructure. We don't know.

Once he has troops in Seoul, it's the rape of nanking x100. They will brutalize the millions of people there, payback for decades of resistance against the kim family's authority.
Quote this message in a reply
The Black_Man
Registered User
User ID: 367336
11-14-2017 07:23 PM

Posts: 1,876



Post: #58
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
This won't be out numbered rest easy



(This post was last modified: 11-14-2017 07:23 PM by The Black_Man.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 436714
11-14-2017 07:26 PM

 



Post: #59
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 05:52 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (11-14-2017 08:42 AM)
BOOM^

So very true. In fact, America hasn't won a war since Russia won WW2.. Lmao


Paper tiger America.

This.

Boomers have never won a war, ever.

War against drugs, nope.
War against crime, nope.
War against poverty, nope.
War against extremism, nope.

War(s) in the Middle East, nope.
War(s) in oil country, nope.
Cyber wars, nope, nope and nope.

Now this administration wants to get us into wars involving trade, currency and Asian territories?

Congrats, trumpeters. You played yourself.

Ayyy bruh you sound mad lmao
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 424051
11-14-2017 07:33 PM

 



Post: #60
RE: US troops would be totally outnumbered and at risk of LOSING a war to North Korea
1110.00  Wrote: (11-14-2017 07:07 PM)
Doesn't EU have a new secret army, paid for with missing trillions?

Yes but that's under the Third Reich headed by the European dictator Angela Merkel. Their concerns are creating a European empire and Middle East conquests.
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication