News
news China's Chilling 'Social Credit System' Is Straight Out of Dystopian Sci-Fi
news UFO 'death ray' made Korean War GIs sick
news The Haunted States of America
news When the Supernatural Feeds on Us
news Russian space agency says space station hole was deliberate sabotage
news Biblical end of days prophecy COMES TRUE as fish swim again in Dead Sea
news 1950s Science Kit Had Real Uranium
news We're Probably Living in a Simulation, Elon Musk Says
news It’s Now Possible To Telepathically Communicate with a Drone Swarm
news New material to 'speed spacecraft to 134,000,000 mph'
news The future of food: what we’ll eat in 2028


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 2.6 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Get Smart! Epispde 52
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 477155
12-07-2018 11:51 PM

 



Post: #166
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
Advertisement
twitchy  Wrote: (12-07-2018 11:49 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (12-07-2018 11:27 PM)
great post.

Everybody else seems to be able to keep the FE thread on the FE thread, except you. You are an exception, following me around and incessantly humping my ankle like an untrained little Chihuahua. It would be flattering if you weren't such a GD dumbass.

sorrysmi smiley_flowers
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 256687
12-07-2018 11:56 PM

 



Post: #167
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
LoP Guest  Wrote: (12-06-2018 09:26 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (12-06-2018 09:21 PM)
I would like to see the data from day one and on, but I don't think that is available. Air Quality reports were concealed.

The thing about radiation is that it can be detected anywhere on the Earth, FLAT OR GLOBE.

Thats the beauty of the 1940s technology of the detection devices, they can show you when 3 mile island happened, Chernobly, Fukushima, ect.

But they did not show Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but thats another subject.

Then there is the nano thermite claim, chuckle

Dimitri K. says Chernobyl problems after the explosion were exaggerated very greatly. He has several chapters on how and why they wanted to create a great fear.
Quote this message in a reply
silversides staff
Truth Prevails
User ID: 148291
12-08-2018 08:36 AM

Posts: 8,312



Post: #168
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
At this time there were a lot of army vets in the population...

It is entirely possible the ideas for shows could have come from personal experiences…

Also from WW2 until about the time of Ford the armed forces were full of heros.

The Four Freedoms
[Image: mule_deer1.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 477155
12-08-2018 11:05 AM

 



Post: #169
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
silversides  Wrote: (12-08-2018 08:36 AM)
At this time there were a lot of army vets in the population...

It is entirely possible the ideas for shows could have come from personal experiences…

Also from WW2 until about the time of Ford the armed forces were full of heros.

Anon
Quote this message in a reply
Jar Jar Binks
meesa tinkin
User ID: 477273
12-08-2018 11:21 AM

Posts: 1,607



Post: #170
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
twitchy  Wrote: (11-25-2018 10:40 PM)
This is an older post of mine from another forum around 2006, some of the links are probably fuqued, but thought I'd post it here.

Get Smart! Epispde 52
I suspect that many of us, including myself, won't be old enough to remember the television show "Get Smart!" starring Don Adams as Maxwell Smart or Agent 86. It was a James Bond spoof of sorts, a clever blend of action and comedy and quite successful for it's time. I've seen re-runs of the show through the years, and quite enjoyed it. The name of the show is fairly ironic however as the Good Guys were called Control, the bad guys were Kaos... that in itself is pretty profound given the espionage premise of the show.
On Febuary 18, 1967, NBC aired episode 52 entitled "Smart Fit The Battle Of Jericho". Frank Lloyd Joshua operated a KAOS front posing as a construction company called the Joshua Construction Company which seemed to have a history of their High Rise buildings exploding. Max Smart infiltrates the construction company and discovers that KAOS is using explosives in the actual construction of the buildings themselves.
Construction of the World Trade Center began in 1966. This episode aired just 197 days after the WTC ground breaking.
Around the time this episode aired, the producers of the show (Leonard B. Stern, Jess Oppenheimer, Jay Sandrich, Burt Nodella, Arnie Rosen, James Komak)
have said they were directly contacted by the CIA who were very interested in where they were getting their ideas from.

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
-David Rockefeller
It is interesting to note that David Rockefeller was the force behind the design and construction of the world trade center.
Quote:http://www.infoplease.com/spot/wtc1.html
Rockefeller Brainchild
The World Trade Center was conceived in the early 1960s by the Downtown-Lower Manhattan Development Association to revitalize the seedy radio row dominated by electronic stores. Chase Manhattan Bank chairman David Rockefeller, founder of the development association, and his brother, New York governor Nelson Rockefeller, pushed hard for the project, insisting it would benefit the entire city.
Here's another interesting tid bit about the show in general...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...t/fact.htm
Just for fun, here's one passage from Spy Television regarding Get Smart and the CIA:
" . . later revelations about the show’s connections to the real espionage community were as humorous as the intentional comedy. In August 1966, the U.S. Army Counter-Intelligence Corps invited Get Smart cast members to entertain at its 19th Annual Convention Banquet. According to Donna McCrohan, network publicists asked that photos be cleared for public release, and real spies posed with Adams and Feldon for gag shots (89-91). But the earlier clearance was revoked, and the photos could never be used. Agents demanded the negatives of the film and a letter stating the negatives had been given over. The letter was written with a carbon, but the carbon had been reversed. One operative confiscated the carbon paper and burned it in an ashtray. Equally unusual was a revelation by a former CIA operative that his agency was concerned that Get Smart’s writers occasionally came too close to reality, especially the Cone of Silence which they in fact had created. The agency considered sending the producers a list of areas to avoid, but elected not to as they feared such a list would result in a parody of their effort."2
Very likely. After all, a prime directive of Buck Henry, Mel Brooks, and the other creators of Get Smart was to satirize a profession they felt was idiotic. Some true-life encounters could have indeed easily been inspirations for Get Smart scripts. For example, both governmental and industry representatives came to film sets when they were either hopeful that some gadgets might be useful in the field or when they feared, as with Get Smart, Hollywood might have stumbled onto gizmos actually in use.
Creepy enough, now check this out...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=25146
...as part of their plot, Kaos was constructing government office buildings in Washington, D.C., and waiting until the office buildings were fully occupied to detonate the explosives with all the workers inside. They were purposely underbidding all the other contractors because Kaos was subsidizing the company so that they could get the government contracts, even at a loss. A German Baron who owned an explosives company that supplied the Germans in WWI and WWIII was supplying the explosives. Joshua told Smart that all Kaos had to do was shoot a bullet at the bricks to initiate a chain reaction detonation of the explosives to bring down the whole building (a miniature version of 9/11). At the end of the episode, the Chief and Max are at the site and the Chief asks, "Where did you put the nitroglycerin?" Smart replies, "Oh, don't worry, Chief, I put it in a safe place. I put it in the cement." The workers were just mixing the cement then. I could swear that the first time I saw the episode, the show then closed with a big explosion. But the second time I saw it several months later, the show ended less dramatically, with Smart and the Chief realizing that the building would still blow up when occupied.
In the concrete... The concrete that mysteriously pulverizes itself during the collapse and has been the subject of so much debate...
[Image: nt_dust_aerial2c.jpg]
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=25146
It is very difficult to get much information about those involved with the creation of the "Get Smart" TV series. It turns out it was produced by a company called Talent Associates, which was formed in 1948 by David Susskind. Previous to this, he was a talent scout for MCA. According to Dr. John Coleman (1996) MCA has always been an arm of British intelligence, MI6, and the Committee of 300.
Episode 52 was written by Arne Sultan, interestingly, all his episodes showed the puzzle pieces for the commercial breaks. Despite being a major player in the entertainment business, his personal life is pretty obscured.
I don't know how accurate this statement is but jeezus...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=28598
Further research uncovers that Yamasaki was a favorite architect of the Bin Laden family patrons, i.e. the Saudi royal family.
On this link, about halfway down the page, this guy has done some calculations that make alot of sense to me...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=25146
SOME GENERAL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Now I will list some questions that have gone unanswered in my mind from the beginning. You undoubtedly have some of your own, but these are some I had that only the explosive concrete theory can answer thus far. I will attempt to explain them later in the paper.
Why did the second building that was hit end up being the first one to fall?
Why so little debris? As already proven, it should have been a lot higher than "a few stories."
Why no chunks of concrete found? Eyewitnesses and photos document that no significant-sized pieces of concrete were remaining.
Why so much dust? A normal building collapse, even with controlled explosives, does not generate such tremendous quantities of dust. Experienced witnesses said there was "incredible" amounts of dust (see description below).
Why were remains of survivors so vaporized? This should not have happened if the building simply collapsed from a fire.
What is the cause of the "WTC cough?" Doctors still have no clue as to what caused it. Dr. Prezant says, "It's a persistent cough,...a sore throat, and interestingly enough,...an accompanying GI irritation." (Zucker, 2001)
EXPLOSIVES MIXED IN CONCRETE ANSWERS ALL OF THE ABOVE
I know it sounds crazy, but then again does it sound so crazy? What sounds crazy to me is THAT MUCH concrete turning itself into micron sized dust because of fire. Ah well, regardless, episode 52 was one hell of coincidence if nothing else given the premise of the show.
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...of_Jericho
According to the bible (Joshua 5:13-6:27) it was the first battle of the Israelites during their conquest of Canaan....
Safely escaping the city the two returned to Joshua and reported that the "whole land was melting with fear".
Note also that Fit is also an old past tense for fought, in other words the title of this episode is possibly more aptly "Smart Fought The Battle Of Jericho".

Haven’t read all posts but I have Get Smart on DVD. Epidode 1, the pilot in B&W, features a plot by KAOS to blow up the Statue of Liberty ...


1dunno1


ps ... really, though
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2018 11:22 AM by Jar Jar Binks.) Quote this message in a reply
twitchy
Registered User
User ID: 465004
12-08-2018 12:32 PM

Posts: 1,292



Post: #171
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
silversides  Wrote: (12-08-2018 08:36 AM)
At this time there were a lot of army vets in the population...

It is entirely possible the ideas for shows could have come from personal experiences…

Also from WW2 until about the time of Ford the armed forces were full of heros.

One of the things that got my attention was the CIA actually visited the set of the Get Smart show repeatedly and were wanting to know where the writers were getting their material from as it apparently paralleled some real intelligence operations or devices. Someone on this show was really well connected and knew their stuff... to the point of actually questioning them. If I remember correctly, Mel Brooks was involved with the show somehow or another and a few other fairly wealthy and connected folks.

Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility, nor makes any Guarantee of the Accuracy or Validity of material in this Post. Material Contained or referred to in this Post is presented for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or Factual Information.
Quote this message in a reply
twitchy
Registered User
User ID: 465004
12-08-2018 12:33 PM

Posts: 1,292



Post: #172
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
Jar Jar Binks  Wrote: (12-08-2018 11:21 AM)
Haven’t read all posts but I have Get Smart on DVD. Epidode 1, the pilot in B&W, features a plot by KAOS to blow up the Statue of Liberty ...


1dunno1


ps ... really, though

Yea, really. Sarcastic1

Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility, nor makes any Guarantee of the Accuracy or Validity of material in this Post. Material Contained or referred to in this Post is presented for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or Factual Information.
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2018 12:34 PM by twitchy.) Quote this message in a reply
twitchy
Registered User
User ID: 465004
12-12-2018 04:10 PM

Posts: 1,292



Post: #173
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
LoP Guest  Wrote: (12-07-2018 11:56 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (12-06-2018 09:26 PM)
The thing about radiation is that it can be detected anywhere on the Earth, FLAT OR GLOBE.

Thats the beauty of the 1940s technology of the detection devices, they can show you when 3 mile island happened, Chernobly, Fukushima, ect.

But they did not show Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but thats another subject.

Then there is the nano thermite claim, chuckle

Dimitri K. says Chernobyl problems after the explosion were exaggerated very greatly. He has several chapters on how and why they wanted to create a great fear.

There was something that Chris Bollyn said about a Senator or a Congressman that ended up working for a company that actually produced nano-thermitic compounds similar to what they supposedly found... Anybody else remember that? There was another Senator that had something to do with missiles that had been modified to resemble civilian airliners right before 9/11 but I don't remember who that was, somewhere in the south.

Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility, nor makes any Guarantee of the Accuracy or Validity of material in this Post. Material Contained or referred to in this Post is presented for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or Factual Information.
Quote this message in a reply
grav
Registered User
User ID: 390445
Yesterday 01:21 AM

Posts: 2,880



Post: #174
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
Bump

• 37 Experiments Proving FE: https://youtu.be/OoxhDtnRmBk
• 200 Proofs Earth Is Not a Spinning Ball, http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/...-ball.html
• Flat Earth Research: pp. 999-1001, http://lunaticoutpost.com/thread-30-page-999.html
Quote this message in a reply
grav
Registered User
User ID: 350387
Yesterday 03:04 AM

Posts: 2,880



Post: #175
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
twitchy  Wrote: (11-25-2018 11:00 PM)
Judy Wood is a joke. And the exit signs in the WTC complex were removed years before 9/11.
Loud dull roar, large boom, who knows really, but if you can find a video of a modern SADM going off in an enclosed building for comparison, then let me know and I'll post it for you. Pretty big damned boom if you ask me, oddly immediately preceeding the collapses of both WTC 1 and WTC 2.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guar...-wtc-1.jpg
How many 'experts' do you reckon would publicly comment on it? There was one that worked at Pallisades who said it looked consistent with an underground detonation, of course you won't find that laying around on the net now even tough it was something that was reported in the MSM at the time....
I'd say 600 feet of lateral ejection at a 45 degree angle is a pretty decent amount of 'great force'.
As much of a third of the mass of the towers was literally atomized into micron sized particulate...there's nothing on this planet aside from a nuclear detonation or a chemical reaction that would explain that pulverized concrete. The energy required to do that has never been accounted for, certainly not by NIST or the 9/11 commission.

I'm still in the early stage of reading this thread and had no idea about the explosive concrete. So please excuse my ignorance if you have already addressed my questions.

Why do you say that Judy Wood is a joke? I saw her video which showed a steel antenna turning to dust as it fell. Not exploded, vaporized.

I had a thread, I guess before the Great Purge, about nukes being a hoax. It went about as well as the FE thread. Nuclear power is something else. Galen Winsor ate uranium and died in his 80s. He said that radioactive materials generate heat when carefully processed. There is no such thing as the atom, so no atom bomb to split or other fissionable reaction. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were fire-bombed. Only wood structures were destroyed.,

What do you think about the California wildfires? I'm convinced they were caused by DEW or other energy weapons, not unlike your trumpets bringing down the walls of Jericho. Lasers, railgun technology, microwave beams, other as yet unknowns.

That's what I think brought down 3 towers on 911. The 2 planes were maybe cruise missiles disguised to look like winged aircraft. They had little effect. The Pentagon was also struck by one of these devices.

• 37 Experiments Proving FE: https://youtu.be/OoxhDtnRmBk
• 200 Proofs Earth Is Not a Spinning Ball, http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/...-ball.html
• Flat Earth Research: pp. 999-1001, http://lunaticoutpost.com/thread-30-page-999.html
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 03:05 AM by grav.) Quote this message in a reply
NAT
lop guest
User ID: 477861
Yesterday 03:14 AM

 



Post: #176
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
twitchy  Wrote: (12-12-2018 04:10 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (12-07-2018 11:56 PM)
Dimitri K. says Chernobyl problems after the explosion were exaggerated very greatly. He has several chapters on how and why they wanted to create a great fear.

There was something that Chris Bollyn said about a Senator or a Congressman that ended up working for a company that actually produced nano-thermitic compounds similar to what they supposedly found... Anybody else remember that? There was another Senator that had something to do with missiles that had been modified to resemble civilian airliners right before 9/11 but I don't remember who that was, somewhere in the south.
Nano is -9 in size, Only the top scientists with Nano-FTIR (nanoscale Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) would be able to confirm this, but based on chemistry of the atom, it was an assumption, and really just propaganda to mislead others with bait.

You could ask me how I know this, but i suspect it does not fit the role that is being played.

Have a nice day.
Quote this message in a reply
twitchy
Registered User
User ID: 465004
Yesterday 08:12 AM

Posts: 1,292



Post: #177
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
grav  Wrote: (Yesterday 03:04 AM)
twitchy  Wrote: (11-25-2018 11:00 PM)
Judy Wood is a joke. And the exit signs in the WTC complex were removed years before 9/11.
Loud dull roar, large boom, who knows really, but if you can find a video of a modern SADM going off in an enclosed building for comparison, then let me know and I'll post it for you. Pretty big damned boom if you ask me, oddly immediately preceeding the collapses of both WTC 1 and WTC 2.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guar...-wtc-1.jpg
How many 'experts' do you reckon would publicly comment on it? There was one that worked at Pallisades who said it looked consistent with an underground detonation, of course you won't find that laying around on the net now even tough it was something that was reported in the MSM at the time....
I'd say 600 feet of lateral ejection at a 45 degree angle is a pretty decent amount of 'great force'.
As much of a third of the mass of the towers was literally atomized into micron sized particulate...there's nothing on this planet aside from a nuclear detonation or a chemical reaction that would explain that pulverized concrete. The energy required to do that has never been accounted for, certainly not by NIST or the 9/11 commission.

I'm still in the early stage of reading this thread and had no idea about the explosive concrete. So please excuse my ignorance if you have already addressed my questions.

Why do you say that Judy Wood is a joke? I saw her video which showed a steel antenna turning to dust as it fell. Not exploded, vaporized.

I had a thread, I guess before the Great Purge, about nukes being a hoax. It went about as well as the FE thread. Nuclear power is something else. Galen Winsor ate uranium and died in his 80s. He said that radioactive materials generate heat when carefully processed. There is no such thing as the atom, so no atom bomb to split or other fissionable reaction. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were fire-bombed. Only wood structures were destroyed.,

What do you think about the California wildfires? I'm convinced they were caused by DEW or other energy weapons, not unlike your trumpets bringing down the walls of Jericho. Lasers, railgun technology, microwave beams, other as yet unknowns.

That's what I think brought down 3 towers on 911. The 2 planes were maybe cruise missiles disguised to look like winged aircraft. They had little effect. The Pentagon was also struck by one of these devices.

Hi Grav, welcome to a few years of my life circa 2004ish lol. This thread actually only represents about a quarter or so of the material I wanted to include on this thread. Reconstructing my research material in a suitable format to post again after so much time, in retrospect, was an ambitious project. A great deal of the referenced material has long since vanished from the internet, images and articles from both mainstream media sources, sites and blogs are now nonexistent so I am finding that that reconstructing the information and being able to cite sources is often mutually exclusive which is frustrating as I'm a bit of a stickler for providing references and sources, so please bare that in mind when considering my comment about Dr. Judy Wood.

I do think that her research uncovered some very interesting, and indeed quite valuable observations about some of the anomalous events surrounding the collapses of the North and South Towers of the WTC complex, however after conducting a great deal of research of my own I felt that her convictions regarding the use of a more exotic 'Directed Energy Weapon' tended to forgo a great deal of evidence which I felt very strongly pointed towards the use of more conventional methods employed to demolish the towers. I am aware of, and have similarly documented alot of the anomalies which she discussed, and found a good bit of it to actually be quite compelling, particularly the vaporization of metal in the radio towers (I'm posting from pure memory here so forgive me if I misspeak), but alot of this could be accurately attributed to the use of conventional explosives and the use of SADM's, or Special Atomic Demolitions Munitions.

There is a link somewhere in this thread to a great blog written by a fairly well known scientist on the discovery of various isotopes in the debris at ground zero, scattered throughout the city, and in the Fresh Kills landfill which were consistent with the detonations of small thermonuclear devices in the appropriate quantities and decay rates. I felt very strongly at the time that Dr. Wood was likely planting conjectures about the DEW weapons in order to draw attention away from the use of SADM's, some of which had apparently gone missing under fairly politically controversial circumstances (again I'm posting from memory here so don't quote me on that lol).

I could be wrong about her, but when I posted that comment originally I was also in the midst of a very heated debate with an Official Story pundit who was using Dr. Wood's speculations to stereotype the 9-11 truth movement as some fringe conspiracy theory, so I do admit it is likely worded harshly and certainly not meant to diminish her research, but more so her conclusions. In retrospect, I am willing to entertain the possibility of a Directed Energy type device but not at the expense of the very obvious squibs and explosions witnesses and videos documented that day... hope that makes sense.

I have only recently looked into the 'Nukes are Hoaxed' theory, and I am familiar with Galen Winsor whom I have a great deal of respect for. I just don't know what to make of it however. I've seen the footage of troops stacking TNT cases near the Trinity Test Site, and I have looked at alot of the videos of detonations that do indeed appear to be... well wonky as hell for lack of a better description, but I don't think I have done enough research to make an informed opinion on the possibility of them being hoaxed altogether. I just don't have the expertise to make up my mind on that one yet, but I try hard to keep an open mind about these sorts of things and if you have any links or suggestions, I'll gladly have a looksee.

One of the most interesting things about the recent fires in California that caught my attention was the wooden guard rail posts that were combusting only where the metal bolts had been attached. That would indeed seem to suggest some sort of high energy electromagnetic field or similar phenomena, very odd indeed. Also I saw a couple videos that seemed to show some sort of beams converging from an elevated position, but my research into that is very limited to such a degree that I don't feel comfortable speculating on it at this point. I will say, however, that it immediately called to mind one of my favorite stories by H. G. Wells and if there is anything to the whole Project Blue Beam thing, that would be the weapon of choice to pull it off IMO.

As to the Pentagon and the planes... I have posted only a small portion of my research here so if it isn't in the thread already, it's likely being pieced together for a future addition to this thread at some point. It's a tedious process though, I'm getting old and tired lol. Thanks for reading the thread though, it's nice to know it doesn't just gather cyber dust on a shelf, there is nothing worse than a dusty book :)

Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility, nor makes any Guarantee of the Accuracy or Validity of material in this Post. Material Contained or referred to in this Post is presented for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or Factual Information.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 09:17 AM by twitchy.) Quote this message in a reply
twitchy
Registered User
User ID: 465004
Yesterday 08:37 AM

Posts: 1,292



Post: #178
RE: Get Smart! Epispde 52
NAT  Wrote: (Yesterday 03:14 AM)
twitchy  Wrote: (12-12-2018 04:10 PM)
There was something that Chris Bollyn said about a Senator or a Congressman that ended up working for a company that actually produced nano-thermitic compounds similar to what they supposedly found... Anybody else remember that? There was another Senator that had something to do with missiles that had been modified to resemble civilian airliners right before 9/11 but I don't remember who that was, somewhere in the south.
Nano is -9 in size, Only the top scientists with Nano-FTIR (nanoscale Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) would be able to confirm this, but based on chemistry of the atom, it was an assumption, and really just propaganda to mislead others with bait.

You could ask me how I know this, but i suspect it does not fit the role that is being played.

Have a nice day.

I'm not sure what to make of your comment about a role being played, but if this is to suggest that I am being disingenuous or intentionally misleading somehow, you're barking up the wrong tree honestly. I'm just regular person that didn't buy into the official story and had the spare time and resources to devote a great deal of research into the events of 9-11.

Your cryptic mention of having some knowledge about the nano sized thermitic material that was alleged to have been discovered being proffered as some kind of red herring is intriguing, but fairly useless if you don't share it, no? There's been a great deal of information about that material that has surfaced over the years, some of it compelling and some of it suspect. One of the better 9-11 researchers, in my opinion, was Chris Bollyn who has written about this pretty extensively and if you haven't seen his work in this area already, I would strongly recommend giving it a read over before making your mind up on the subject...
Quote:http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-archive-2015-...icle_15234
The Basics of Super-Thermite & the Destruction of the Twin Towers
May 10, 2015

Grav, there's also a sort of hit piece in there about Dr. Judy Wood that you might find interesting. Note I said interesting, not pleasant mind you... and don't shoot the messenger, but apparently Chris Bollyn doesn't seem to think much of her.

Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility, nor makes any Guarantee of the Accuracy or Validity of material in this Post. Material Contained or referred to in this Post is presented for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or Factual Information.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 09:13 AM by twitchy.) Quote this message in a reply








Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication