News
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons
news How plants reclaimed Chernobyl's poisoned land
news First Robot Arm Controlled by Thought Alone
news By 2050, many U.S. cities will have weather like they’ve never seen
news The Unexplained Mystery Boom Phenomenon Continues Worldwide
news Scientists fear end to Mankind not 'decades away' but 'much sooner'


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 9 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex FBI chief
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483118
01-13-2019 02:58 PM

 



Post: #46
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
Advertisement
Deep within the NYT article, so much text, you have to look really hard for the truth, but here is the line from the article:

"No evidence has emerged publicly that Mr. Trump was secretly in contact with or took direction from Russian government officials."

Two lines of facts out of hundreds of lines of speculation and lies.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483278
01-13-2019 03:01 PM

 



Post: #47
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:58 PM)
Deep within the NYT article, so much text, you have to look really hard for the truth, but here is the line from the article:

"No evidence has emerged publicly that Mr. Trump was secretly in contact with or took direction from Russian government officials."

Two lines of facts out of hundreds of lines of speculation and lies.

You're right, If you plan to take trump to trial for Treason you wouldn't "Publicly" display your EVIDENCE prior to trial.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:04 PM

 



Post: #48
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:01 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:58 PM)
Deep within the NYT article, so much text, you have to look really hard for the truth, but here is the line from the article:

"No evidence has emerged publicly that Mr. Trump was secretly in contact with or took direction from Russian government officials."

Two lines of facts out of hundreds of lines of speculation and lies.

You're right, If you plan to take trump to trial for Treason you wouldn't "Publicly" display your EVIDENCE prior to trial.

So you are suggesting that Trump go to trial with no public disclosure of evidence against him?
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483118
01-13-2019 03:05 PM

 



Post: #49
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:01 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:58 PM)
Deep within the NYT article, so much text, you have to look really hard for the truth, but here is the line from the article:

"No evidence has emerged publicly that Mr. Trump was secretly in contact with or took direction from Russian government officials."

Two lines of facts out of hundreds of lines of speculation and lies.

You're right, If you plan to take trump to trial for Treason you wouldn't "Publicly" display your EVIDENCE prior to trial.

The reprinted what we already knew, just hyped up on speculation.

They still have no facts.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:07 PM

 



Post: #50
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:51 PM)
He Man  Wrote: (01-12-2019 10:58 PM)
This guy would be in a position to know what is likely and if he says it is likely then that means it is. Why would you suppose a person with his experience by saying it is likely is somehow saying he has nothing?

Lets see the Mueller report, it will be out soon and then even you strange operatives in Vienna can see what charges are well supported and well evidenced.

Fair?

I love how speculation is actually proof for you but if anybody else speculates you call them out immediately.
What a child.
I'm done reading your garbage.

Well here is a rough equivalent closer to home

http://lunaticoutpost.com/thread-98180.html

It isn't true but wouldn't the same argument be used by D's accusers?
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483278
01-13-2019 03:18 PM

 



Post: #51
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:04 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:01 PM)
You're right, If you plan to take trump to trial for Treason you wouldn't "Publicly" display your EVIDENCE prior to trial.

So you are suggesting that Trump go to trial with no public disclosure of evidence against him?

Please SHOW any trial where the Evidence of guilt was published to the public PRIOR to going to trial....I thought you claimed to be some kind of legal "expert"....LOL
Fork

User ID: 361628
01-13-2019 03:22 PM

Posts: 22,732



Post: #52
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:41 PM)
FreeFlow  Wrote: (01-12-2019 09:55 PM)
How much 'likely' ?
Only proves the informant has nothing

I am convinced that all this back and forth is meant to break our psyches.

I see build up of juicy info to gain interest and disparage the opposition only to have the opposition gain the similar upper hand a week or so later.

It's like a seesaw of emotions on a weekly basis.

This can only lead to a few things.. all of which are CRISIS

Once 5G rolls out, we will be efficient zombie machines for the elite to pull on our puppet strings.

Jhikpghf
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:23 PM

 



Post: #53
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:18 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:04 PM)
So you are suggesting that Trump go to trial with no public disclosure of evidence against him?

Please SHOW any trial where the Evidence of guilt was published to the public PRIOR to going to trial....I thought you claimed to be some kind of legal "expert"....LOL

Look up Clinton Impeachment.

That is the huge difference between the two to date.

If you are going to allow leaks you need to also leak the evidence.

Also look into Nixon proceedings.

That is my issue which you folks view as me being supportive of the man and all he stands for which zi in no way do.

You can't see the repercussions of what you are currently supporting and usually demanding.
Fork

User ID: 361628
01-13-2019 03:24 PM

Posts: 22,732



Post: #54
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:47 PM)
Fork  Wrote: (01-13-2019 02:19 PM)
sure thing, Zombie.

Sure thing, Jew.

I am not jewish.
but....
I have started watching the man in high tower series.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483278
01-13-2019 03:26 PM

 



Post: #55
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:23 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:18 PM)
Please SHOW any trial where the Evidence of guilt was published to the public PRIOR to going to trial....I thought you claimed to be some kind of legal "expert"....LOL

Look up Clinton Impeachment.

That is the huge difference between the two to date.

If you are going to allow leaks you need to also leak the evidence.

Also look into Nixon proceedings.

That is my issue which you folks view as me being supportive of the man and all he stands for which zi in no way do.

You can't see the repercussions of what you are currently supporting and usually demanding.

Damn Ebb, all that thread riding yesterday has worn you out, looks like you got a case of the "I have no idea what I'm talking about Blues"
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:28 PM

 



Post: #56
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:26 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:23 PM)
Look up Clinton Impeachment.

That is the huge difference between the two to date.

If you are going to allow leaks you need to also leak the evidence.

Also look into Nixon proceedings.

That is my issue which you folks view as me being supportive of the man and all he stands for which zi in no way do.

You can't see the repercussions of what you are currently supporting and usually demanding.

Damn Ebb, all that thread riding yesterday has worn you out, looks like you got a case of the "I have no idea what I'm talking about Blues"

Do you know why this NYT piece was published?

I do

See if you can express what it does
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:37 PM

 



Post: #57
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
Surely you know why these news pieces are published

And I point out every news source picked up this one

Every single one.

Can you tell us why?

It's pretty obvious since you know so much about the unique attributes of a federal grand jury..
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 483278
01-13-2019 03:39 PM

 



Post: #58
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:37 PM)
Surely you know why these news pieces are published

And I point out every news source picked up this one

Every single one.

Can you tell us why?

It's pretty obvious since you know so much about the unique attributes of a federal grand jury..

Yea, I easily debunked YOUR CLAIM that they issue Warrants !!!
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:42 PM

 



Post: #59
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:39 PM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (01-13-2019 03:37 PM)
Surely you know why these news pieces are published

And I point out every news source picked up this one

Every single one.

Can you tell us why?

It's pretty obvious since you know so much about the unique attributes of a federal grand jury..

Yea, I easily debunked YOUR CLAIM that they issue Warrants !!!
It was a nice attempt at a trap but it didn't really work.

Tell us what is unique about the federal grand jury if you will
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 471605
01-13-2019 03:44 PM

 



Post: #60
RE: Mueller ‘classified’ intercepts: Trump worked with Russia: "likely" ex F...
It was you who stated that the grand jury doesn't change Mueller's report....which I pointed out is ridiculous but I didn't dwell on it.

You Dodge the fact that that is their entire function.
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication